Posted on May 15, 2020
SSG Squad Leader
12.4K
181
115
13
13
0
Open discussion if anyone as an example they have seen, or are dealing with right now. Is their a conflict of interest between UCMJ and our own rights?
Avatar feed
Responses: 37
SPC Erich Guenther
0
0
0
Edited >1 y ago
So here is my two cents based on experience in the past running a restaurant franchise as well as opinion mixed in. First the government via health department does have legal right to shutdown a business if you do not follow the established health guidelines. Second how many people you can have indoors in a restaurant is regulated by the Fire Department so that is not new either. Third you need a business license to operate via some kind of document registered with the state secretary of the state you operate in. That specific state establishes requirements to obtain that. So with a restaurant you cannot buy produce for it from a wholesaler with out a state business license and without a tax exemption certificate from the state. So they can screw with you there. So in my view the restaurant operational restrictions are all legal and based on past precedent.

I agree with you on the shelter in place orders though but only as they relate to civilians not military. I think it depends on the state your in. Here in Texas they think they have legal authority because earlier they passed a fairly recent (within last 25 years) law that states in declared States of Emergency the State can order people to remain in their homes. I'm not a lawyer so take this with a grain of salt but I would expect this could be legally challenged as the state would have to prove to a court that the state of emergency was valid and based on a real concern about the overall safety or well being of the larger population. I think you could easily argue (again not a lawyer), that the State of Texas has not met that burden with this virus as it did not declare states of Emergencies given past outbreaks of Corona Virus' which we still do not have vaccines for. That's if you had the money and time to challenge this Texas State Law.

As for the military it is more complex because the DoD is supposed to maintain good order and discipline and I would think that extends to good health as well as readiness of the overall force (APFT tests). So because they are also concerned with overall readiness as well of each unit that is deployable. I don't think your going to be able to challenge the law or orders on the military side of the fence. As others have stated because I think this is one of the sacrifices you make when you enlist. Long winded answer and also again, not a lawyer, just what I would expect not really knowing.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
Cadet 2LT (Pre-Commission)
0
0
0
Of course it is, but shit...part of the game tbh.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
1LT Chaplain Candidate
0
0
0
Edited >1 y ago
Good question to explore, we ought to have a reasoned answer.

No, and I think it's hard to argue that anyone does. This is a job you volunteer for so at best some rights are voluntarily surrendered, but more to the issue is that everything is legal. For example, I cannot claim my constitutional rights as a citizen at political event when I show up in uniform and support a certain policy or politician. The position I hold in the service legally overtakes certain rights I had as an ordinary citizen. The same logic is used with most any of our constitutional rights; in order to achieve the intent of government service and uphold certain separations between the military and state its members forfeit certain rights that they would otherwise enjoy as regular citizens. No real violation occurs and the rule of law is upheld through what I see as a system of checks and balances.

I agree with MSG (Join to see) . A useful point of clarification is to ask whether our legal rights are truly being infringed, or is our sense of entitlement being inconvenienced.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
MCPO Roger Collins
0
0
0
Anyone that’s had a Summary Courts Martial might think so. And as noted, 1st amendment could be questionable. But, as many have stated, AVF, you agreed to the limits imposed.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Steven Mangus
0
0
0
The services protect democracy. They don't practice the former. We all volunteered fully knowing, we, as servicemembers are held to a higher standard than the other 99% that don't join. So, no, my rights were not infringed ever..
(0)
Comment
(0)
SFC Domingo M.
SFC Domingo M.
>1 y
In my case, I did not volunteer but I also never felt that my rights were infringed. This was during my first two years, thereafter, I made a choice and stayed through retirement. Never was a complainer.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Herbert Bollum
0
0
0
You gave up most of your rights when you joined and swore to follow orders (as long as they are Legal orders).
(0)
Comment
(0)
SSG Squad Leader
SSG (Join to see)
>1 y
At the cost of protecting the constitution we gave up a little bit of our own liberties?
(0)
Reply
(0)
SSG Squad Leader
SSG (Join to see)
>1 y
When we swore in it stated to obey the orders of the president and officers appointed over me if that’s what your meaning But not just to do only that
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SGM Bill Frazer
0
-1
1
Cody, always trying to stir the pot. Because of the duties and regs of the military you have what the call abridged rights, and when you enlisted you swore to them and agreed.
(0)
Comment
(1)
SSG Squad Leader
SSG (Join to see)
>1 y
I’m sorry what exactly do you mean “always trying to stir the pot”?
(0)
Reply
(0)
SFC Casey O'Mally
SFC Casey O'Mally
>1 y
I swore to NO "abridged rights." I swore to uphold and defend the Constitution, and I certainly expected same Constitution to apply to me. Only after I made it to basic did I learn that until O died, ETSed, or retired, the Constitution was as useful to me as 2-ply Charmin (TM).
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close