Posted on Jan 28, 2020
Has anyone had any issues with an extension bonus paying out due to IPPS-A?
4.21K
5
5
1
1
0
Has anyone had any issues with an extension bonus paying out due to IPPS-A?
Re-enlistment
NGB
Military Pay
Issues
Posted 4 y ago
Responses: 3
1
1
0
1
1
0
SGT (Join to see)
Because it is all integrated and what is in IPPS-A is not pushing to GIMS. I am 9993. I was suppose to be in a true vacancy but when the transaction was suppose to happen to transfer the guy out my state went dark while waiting for IPPS-A to come live. Needless to say we are live but a few things changed and that guy holiest my para/ln has not gone to a new home yet. I’m 9993 for reorganizational purposes (IE). So that does not terminate the bonus.
(0)
(0)
1
1
0
I will know soon enough if there is an issue. I have experienced that even though you have a bonus hard date on your DD Form 4/1 they usually make a statement like this,
"I understand that the effective date of my reenlistment is one day following my current ETS date of XXXXXXX, therefore the effective date is xxxxxx +1. I further understand that any reenlistment bonus payments will behin on the effective date. this contract expires on (ETS)."
Now the kicker is they also have a window of leeway for processing of up to 90 days. I know its ridiculous. But I have a CPT that has been pushed 10 months on his bonus so far and it is still not resolved.
Hope that helps SGT
"I understand that the effective date of my reenlistment is one day following my current ETS date of XXXXXXX, therefore the effective date is xxxxxx +1. I further understand that any reenlistment bonus payments will behin on the effective date. this contract expires on (ETS)."
Now the kicker is they also have a window of leeway for processing of up to 90 days. I know its ridiculous. But I have a CPT that has been pushed 10 months on his bonus so far and it is still not resolved.
Hope that helps SGT
(1)
(0)
SGT (Join to see)
I was 9993. IPPS-A won’t kick it to GIMS if you are. NGB had to manually put my stuff in.
(1)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google