Posted on Feb 1, 2015
SSG Paralegal
9.89K
6
10
0
0
0
When I ETS'ed from the Guard I attempted to go back to the Navy. I was disqualified by medical for my latex sensitivity that they had waived in 2007 when I first enlisted. Can anyone help me understand what happened?
Posted in these groups: 98226061 WaiversRe enlistment logo Re-enlistment
Avatar feed
Responses: 3
MSG Usarec Liason At Nrpc/Nara
2
2
0
Every branch has different medical standards...it's possible the Navy doesn't accept that allergy for whatever the reason.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
LTC Yinon Weiss
2
2
0
Waivers were much more loose in 2007 when the military had a tougher time meeting recruitment goals. They are more strict now, which affects many people. So you're not alone.
(2)
Comment
(0)
SSG Paralegal
SSG (Join to see)
10 y
Makes me feel a bit better.
(0)
Reply
(0)
MAJ Military Personnel And Administrative Specialist
MAJ (Join to see)
10 y
I have to agree with MAJ Weiss; from 2001-2006ish we were at the high of wars in the middle east. Especially from 01-04 almost anyone could join and 'go to war'. Now the wars are over and the budget is becoming an issue, the armed forces are cutting back and using multiple means/excuses to get rid of people or in your situation prevent from reenlisting.

You could always ask a Navy recruiter to look into it. Maybe it was MOS related?
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
LTC Cavalry Officer
1
1
0
I had a Soldier who had been Chaptered for a drug offense several years ago as a junior enlisted Soldier. A few months after he left the Army, he enlisted into a state National Guard unit and got what he understood was a waiver for his Chapter.
After serving in the National Guard for several years (and doing very well, including getting promoted to be a NCO) he then came back into the Active Duty Army.
When he enlisted into the Active Army he thought he had again gotten a waiver for his Chapter.
He tried to remove the earlier Article 15 from his records and on review of his records, officials noticed that he had marked NO on previous drug use on both enlistment documents (because he thought he had a waiver, he did not have to acknowledge his previous use).

Long story short, he went before a GO to determine the final outcome of his service and will probably not be allowed to serve much longer based on the administrative punishment he received.
(1)
Comment
(0)
LTC Cavalry Officer
LTC (Join to see)
10 y
I realized I did not put the 'so what' to my anecdote above!
There are ways to get waivers for all kinds of things, but make sure you fully understand the process, including everything you do following.
(0)
Reply
(0)
PFC Behavioral Health Specialist
PFC (Join to see)
>1 y
Sir, may I ask if this was within the last few years? That soldier was not myself, however I know an SM with a nearly identical story, although on the other side of the Big River.
Thank you in advance.
(0)
Reply
(0)
LTC Cavalry Officer
LTC (Join to see)
>1 y
PFC (Join to see), I'm not going to tell when this was, or who in consideration of privacy.
(0)
Reply
(0)
PFC Behavioral Health Specialist
PFC (Join to see)
>1 y
NO problem at all. I understand completely and appreciate your integrity, I just "had" to ask. I am friends with an SM who's story is like that of which you mentioned however this SM never mentioned anything about a GO so I probably should've dropped my curiosity there.
Thank you again.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close