Posted on Jan 21, 2016
Do you have a specific preference between Windows or Linux Ubuntu Server Operating System?
12.6K
18
24
0
0
0
I'm interested in some real world experience between the two. . . because project.
This is thread is about SERVER OS.
This is thread is about SERVER OS.
Edited >1 y ago
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 6
I prefer Linux headless servers because
1. Security
2. Less cost/zero cost for enterprise level applications
3. Resource friendly
1. Security
2. Less cost/zero cost for enterprise level applications
3. Resource friendly
(1)
(0)
SSG Nathaniel Bendel
If you don't have much command line experience in Linux, you will be on google a lot. I found that being able to do everything I needed without moving my hand over to a mouse was great. There's no fancy graphics to look at but it's a clean efficient way of running a server.
(1)
(0)
SGT (Join to see)
Any purpose. I'm asking to hear from the RP community. Also, the more questions I ask like this, the easier it is to network with Veterans in the same field.
(0)
(0)
Maj Kevin "Mac" McLaughlin
For me it depends one what I would use it for. I use Windows for everyday PC needs and some security, Linux I use for most of my security tools (I prefer Red Hat over Ubuntu though). When it comes to servers, this depends on what you intend to serve.
(0)
(0)
Maj Kevin "Mac" McLaughlin
When it comes to servers, Linux has always proven to be more stable and they required fewer reboots/downtime. For personal use though, I've given up on the tinkering as I am older and I have a wife and kids at home. It's already enough work to serve as their 24 hr tech support. Still, at work I use both OS types on a regular basis. But I do so virtually. The only servers I create are security related (Nessus, backdoors, etc...) which do not require a significant length of service.
(1)
(0)
It depends on what I am doing. I game on my PC, so I run Windows dual boot to Windows on my main computer. I tend to use Linux Mint for everything else.
(0)
(0)
(0)
(0)
SSgt Mark Lines
SGT (Join to see) - Sorry about that, it was late at night for me and I misread your initial post. In the past, I used a light install, no desktop environment CLI only, as my HTPC server for my house. I preferred this because of the low hard ware footprint and it was rock solid stable compared to the Windows Home Server that was available then (2010). Over its 3 year life, the server never failed once.
(1)
(0)
It varies. I am a network admin for an accounting firm and we use xenserver which is a based off the linux kernel. It takes most standard linix commands. As far as what i host on those. They are 100% windows. I have pools of random desktops. Then windows servers. My issue with linux is most software companies in the financial field are based off of windows os.
(0)
(0)
SGT (Join to see)
I've heard that sysadmin and finance can go really well. I don't care much for that though.
(0)
(0)
PFC Jonathon Luken
It can be boring but depending on what specialty you go into it can be really challenging and rewarding. I run a virtual farm and some of the issue you come across can really be fun to solve.
(1)
(0)
PFC Jonathon Luken
SGT (Join to see) - Well i personally do virtualization. There are times when its boring but thats mainly because i work small buisness so there isnt always something going on besides basic maint.
(1)
(0)
Depends on what you want to do and what software you want! Window is loosely written allowing more viruses but there are a lot of programs for it. Linux is very hard to write so vertually virus free but you are limited in programs and need software written usually to your needs.
(0)
(0)
SSgt Robert Jorgensen
Yes, there is a lot more software available for Windows compared to Mac. There is some programs that can be interchanged Windows to Mac and Mac to Windows. Windows was originally IBM's answer to compete with Mac.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next