Posted on Feb 6, 2014
Do you think this would be a good way to recognize people who stayed in for the long-haul?
12.2K
78
64
4
4
0
In the most recent edition of Army Times, a Sergeant First Class puts forth the case to create a "Retirement Award" for those who serve twenty or more years. <div><br></div><div>Do you think this would be a good way to recognize people who stayed in for the long-haul? Or do you think it just another award for "checking the block" like the Army Service Ribbon?</div>
Posted 12 y ago
Responses: 32
I also heard of it referred to as a longevity award. I think it would be another good way to show how many years you have served in increments of 5-10-15-20. Needless to say it ends up being a retirement award but I also like the idea of it being available for at least 10-15-20 years of service.
(0)
(0)
SSG (Join to see)
Chief Goodman, I like the 10-15-20 idea too. I was reading in the Army Times that the SFC that came up with the idea thought it's precedence would be second only to the MoH, I think that is a good idea too, but I also agree with the people who don't think it should only because of the other awards for actions of valor. What is your stand point?
(1)
(0)
CW2 (Join to see)
I would NOT even consider making it second to the MoH... However, I could see it given precedence over the Good Conduct Medal since it is almost the same thing but has a roman numeral for years of service.
(0)
(0)
A retirement medal won't do anyone any good. When you are in the local work force you don' wear ribbons so once the ceremony is over, nobody knows.
(0)
(1)
Read This Next

Retirement
Awards
Army Times
