Posted on Jun 6, 2014
Does anyone think that Veterans (ones that served 4-15 years) that did not retire should have access to the PX Commissary and have support?
5.16K
71
57
4
4
0
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 27
Several responses state that it should be an exclusive benefit for those who are active and for those that retired. I can agree with that. However I think that allowing those that served 4-15 to use the commissary or BX/PX would be a benefit to those that are retired or currently serving. Right now near almost every installation I would venture to say there is a super Walmart or like business within driving distance of the commissary or BX/PX. These super stores are sometimes cheaper and more convenient to those with families and the lower ranks forced to live off post. If 4-15 veterans were allowed to shop at the commissary and BX/PX, would it benefit all by lowering prices and better selection for retires and active duty personnel? The force is being drawn down, buying in bulk for lower prices will be harder to come by, prices will rise. Bring those prices down by allowing more to shop to help offset the cost of doing business. My two cents.
(1)
(0)
PO1 (Join to see)
SSgt David Norcutt I'll challenge you on the assertion that Walmart,et al, provide a cheaper source of goods. Just the other day I spent several hours with a shopping list from H377 on what our household needed. I visited all the local (within 45 miles) stores with this list, taking notes, pictures, etc to make a complete and thorough comparison. Getting up early the very next day, I traveled 43 miles to the commissary and exchange - again, comparing apples to apples and oranges to oranges. With 2 exceptions of a list with over 188 individual items in it, the commissary provided the best price BEFORE I attempted to use my many coupons. The BX however, did not do quite as well, with a saving of only 18% compared to the outside prices, again, BEFORE I used coupons.
All total, I saved $183.17 against the outside prices and adding another $54.10 in coupons.
Now, I don't expect that sort of savings every time I go to the base - but I'm not going to take the generic "everyone's" word that the outside prices beat the BX/Px and commissary every time.
All total, I saved $183.17 against the outside prices and adding another $54.10 in coupons.
Now, I don't expect that sort of savings every time I go to the base - but I'm not going to take the generic "everyone's" word that the outside prices beat the BX/Px and commissary every time.
(2)
(0)
SSgt David Norcutt
PO1 George Medley I'm glad you did a price comparison and your results are impressive. It would be interesting to see your findings; the products you compared, price differences, bulk options, generic options etc. Now, I haven't shopped at a military installation since 1992, so I have no idea what commissary/BX prices are currently. However when I was serving I found that it depended on what I was buying. As a young state side E-4 with two kids, my wife and I found that it was cheaper to shop at the commissary for brand name products, meats and other items. But I could find generic items, bulk prices, better quality meats and better quality produce off the base. Overseas however it was the commissary for most everything. But that was 20 plus years ago. I know that my mom, a widowed spouse finds that walmart compares to the commissary depending on the product, but is more convenient for her to shop at.
That being said I guess I should have left the comparison to Walmart out of my response.
My point is that with more people allowed to shop at the commissary and BX/PX could/should in theory lower prices. Thus benefiting all but more importantly those that need it the most, the younger enlisted who are paid way to low and need all the help they can get. (that's another discussion)
I didn't intend my post to be the "word" it was intended to provoke thought about reducing prices for those that need it.
That being said I guess I should have left the comparison to Walmart out of my response.
My point is that with more people allowed to shop at the commissary and BX/PX could/should in theory lower prices. Thus benefiting all but more importantly those that need it the most, the younger enlisted who are paid way to low and need all the help they can get. (that's another discussion)
I didn't intend my post to be the "word" it was intended to provoke thought about reducing prices for those that need it.
(1)
(0)
PO1 (Join to see)
SSgt David Norcutt Well, I'll have to get permission to go public with our family list - my kitchen pass doesn't cover that area. But I can tell you that there are no bulk purchases involved and no generics - it's my understanding that under current regs the commissary cannot offer off brands / generics. The exchange however, has several items that are offered known as "NEx" brands or something like that. I found those items to be similiar in pricing to the "value brands" that Walmart has for their off brand items. What I did note is that there are a lot fewer of these "nex" brand when compared to a like item in Walmart.
Part of my comparison was to go to Costco and Sam's also - those have some serious bulk pricing and can make a huge difference - if you are looking for those items.
You are correct - pricing depends on sales, brand and especially, timing.
Part of my comparison was to go to Costco and Sam's also - those have some serious bulk pricing and can make a huge difference - if you are looking for those items.
You are correct - pricing depends on sales, brand and especially, timing.
(1)
(0)
I'm not sure I want to stick my oar in, but... As a prior service member with the Navy ( and later Nat. Guard) I have only ever used a Commissary or PX when I was in Boot, and in school. For the Navy, many service members never spend much time on a base where this is an option. We spend the majority of our time afloat. And speaking to my service, I would have loved to continue for 20, but I was caught in the Clinton RIF, and found the Bush N.G. far to relaxed regarding discipline for me to continue (I know, that's my problem, I'm just using "me" as an example). Regarding whether prior service should have access to the base facilities now, I don't see that it would be detrimental, most of us would never use the benefit due to distance, but the few that would be injecting money into the system, could only serve to boost the budget on base. As mentioned previously cuts to their budget are being considered and expanding the role of the PX/BX system could enhance their prestige with congress. Besides, just because the system is non-profit (attached to the MWR) doesn't mean that it must stay that way.
The US Military has always functioned best when it was flexible and fast, by ossifying parts of the military system we reduce its effectiveness overall.
The US Military has always functioned best when it was flexible and fast, by ossifying parts of the military system we reduce its effectiveness overall.
(1)
(0)
no, that is for active duty and retirees, that was never promised and is part of the benefits for those that served until retirement, if they were dismissed early for medical reasons wanting benefits they receive a medical retirement.
I understand that few people will agree with everyone's medical discharges, some may deserve more, some less, never the less, we have a system and we need to fix the parts that are broken not complicate them.
I understand that few people will agree with everyone's medical discharges, some may deserve more, some less, never the less, we have a system and we need to fix the parts that are broken not complicate them.
(1)
(0)
Sgt (Join to see) _ I find it said that we can spend money on foreign nationals and illegal immigrants and not for low income military personnel. Really? I believe they do deserve it, without a doubt.
(1)
(0)
I would support a limited implementation of this idea. I would suggest veteran access to foreign installations in non-combat areas (ie Japan, Germany, etc). I don't really have anything to justify this other than it was the strangest feeling to be in a foreign country and not be able to enter a US installation on my own after having served there. Seems to me that it would not take much to allow this, and it would mean a lot to American vets traveling/living abroad to get easier access to US products.
As far as the ID card issue, many states offer a veteran ID card after the vet has proven good service. I'd say that plus a passport with a proper entry stamp ought to be sufficient.
As far as the ID card issue, many states offer a veteran ID card after the vet has proven good service. I'd say that plus a passport with a proper entry stamp ought to be sufficient.
(1)
(0)
While it may sound like a good idea, I would have to say no. It's for the military and retirees.
(1)
(0)
The prices never seem that great as the quality and selection has diminished. Perhaps, it isn't that great of a benefit overall. I would be interested in anyone with real numbers on cost savings compared to the general economy.
(1)
(0)
Cpl Michael Strickler
Working at the FE Warren commissary I can say that price variation depends on the product or that company's strategy to get people through the door (making bread and milk cheaper so you pay a little higher on cereal and jelly). Just like local grocers some products are higher and some are lower. They also fluctuate from week to week. I doubt that numbers would really show a dynamic change.
(0)
(0)
As long as their serve was honorable , I would say it should match the amount of years that individual served. ie four years of serves would yeild four more years of PX / Commissary use. This could be considered a "Thank You" for serving your country.
(1)
(0)
Sgt (Join to see)
good example how bout this idea using your idea of 4 what about 4 times a month or a year?
(0)
(0)
COL Vincent Stoneking
Having been in the Reserves back in the day when we had to use our "commissary cards" (literally punchcards that were good for 24 visits and had to be be physically marked each visit), NO to the X times per period.
Regardless of allowing non-retired former service members to use the commissary or not, using a "rationing" system both discourages use at the same time, it creates administrative headaches (and reports to congress!!!) for the AAFES organization.
Separately, I would say no to access as well, as both are subsidized non-profit activities that are explicitly intended for those currently serving or honorably retired. Moreover, cuts are being considered to both services as they have trouble breaking even, even with current subsidy. My simple rule would be DOD ID Card = Access.
Regardless of allowing non-retired former service members to use the commissary or not, using a "rationing" system both discourages use at the same time, it creates administrative headaches (and reports to congress!!!) for the AAFES organization.
Separately, I would say no to access as well, as both are subsidized non-profit activities that are explicitly intended for those currently serving or honorably retired. Moreover, cuts are being considered to both services as they have trouble breaking even, even with current subsidy. My simple rule would be DOD ID Card = Access.
(2)
(0)
Read This Next

