Posted on Jan 21, 2016
Does the military have the right to control what you are allowed to believe... religiously speaking?
9.51K
46
46
4
4
0
If you believe you can have multiple wives or husbands, can the military say no? Or the government as a whole, can they say, "if you believe that, you are not allowed in our military", even though it does not hinder your performance, military manner, or evals. Does religious beliefs complicate a military career?
Posted in these groups: 
Religion
Religion
Posted 9 y ago
Responses: 16
13
13
0
I'll just take your questions in order...
1. No, the military does not have a right to control what you are allowed to believe. Believe whatever you want! It's your actions regarding that belief that are regulated - not just for religion, but for everything else too.
2. If you "believe" you can have multiple wives... religiously, that's on you. Legally, the law does not currently agree with you - and it is the law that the military must respect and follow. It's not the military that restricts your ability to legally marry more than one person - it's the law.
3. The military won't stop you from being IN the military. They just stop you from being married to multiple people. The military won't kick you out just for believing it's ok. You may get kicked out for acting on it and breaking the law.
4. Do religious beliefs complicate a military career? Absolutely. But its not usually because of the marriage aspect. Some religions have prohibitions on violence - that would make it difficult to stay in the military because of the conflict of interest. In that case, it's up to the servicemember to determine where their loyalties lie. Is it in their religion, or their military service that takes precedence? If religion takes priority, then the servicemember has the obligation to remove themselves from service - either through regular ETS or by requesting release under "conscientious objector" status.
1. No, the military does not have a right to control what you are allowed to believe. Believe whatever you want! It's your actions regarding that belief that are regulated - not just for religion, but for everything else too.
2. If you "believe" you can have multiple wives... religiously, that's on you. Legally, the law does not currently agree with you - and it is the law that the military must respect and follow. It's not the military that restricts your ability to legally marry more than one person - it's the law.
3. The military won't stop you from being IN the military. They just stop you from being married to multiple people. The military won't kick you out just for believing it's ok. You may get kicked out for acting on it and breaking the law.
4. Do religious beliefs complicate a military career? Absolutely. But its not usually because of the marriage aspect. Some religions have prohibitions on violence - that would make it difficult to stay in the military because of the conflict of interest. In that case, it's up to the servicemember to determine where their loyalties lie. Is it in their religion, or their military service that takes precedence? If religion takes priority, then the servicemember has the obligation to remove themselves from service - either through regular ETS or by requesting release under "conscientious objector" status.
(13)
(0)
LTC (Join to see)
PO2 Morton Scisco - no, the answer is no, they can't control what you believe. They (or rather the legal system) can control what you act on.
(1)
(0)
LTC (Join to see)
PO2 Morton Scisco - I believe you are interpreting the response that you want to out of MAJ Bryan Zeski comments. The government cannot control what you believe in only the actions that come of those beliefs. Take for instance Rastafarians believe that smoking marijuana is a way to cleanse their soul and commune with God. That is fine to believe that, and you can be a Rastafarian in the military, but you still have to abide by the rules and regulations that the military states while you are in. It does nothing to stop you from believing whatever you believe, just from practicing actions that are against the law or other regulations.
(4)
(0)
MAJ Bryan Zeski
PO2 Morton Scisco - I thought I was relatively clear. No, the government doesn't control what you believe. Yes, the government does control, to some extent, your actions in response to those beliefs.
(2)
(0)
MAJ Bryan Zeski
MSgt Mike Mikulski - Honestly, all the things you mentioned would have zero effect on military capability. They are there simply as a traditional morality thing. Even marijuana. It's already been shown that marijuana is less harmful and less addictive than alcohol, so the point of banning it has nothing to do with anything practical, it's just a throw-back ban.
(0)
(0)
4
4
0
Well, on polygamy, the military won't acknowledge any other spouse than the ONE you list. Attempting to enroll your 2nd (or 3rd) wife as a dependent is fine --as long as her predecessor is replaced with the most current... AND your divorce decree is finalized. Otherwise, polygamy is either a misdemeanor or felony in every state of the union. Truly not sure how the UCMJ addresses this... if it even does? Anyway, why would anyone want more than one wife? I can barely handle one.
(4)
(0)
LTC (Join to see)
I remember a comedian saying that he was investigating which religion to have, and thought that ones that allowed multiple wives sounded great. That is until he got married. Bada bing!
(1)
(0)
MAJ Bryan Zeski
LTC (Join to see) - I think the way to work the "multiple spouse" thing is to have them on a rotation. One week here, one week there... and so on.
(1)
(0)
LTC (Join to see)
MAJ Bryan Zeski - that might work, as long as they can keep their husband rotation straight as well!
(3)
(0)
2
2
0
I'm not aware of any religious belief that requires polygamy so I'm not sure how you can claim that a restriction on polygamy is hindering your religious belief. There is also nothing stopping you from living together with 1,000 women if that's what floats your boat... you can however only call one of them your wife. In the civilian world you could settle for having 999 concubines and 1 wife instead of 1,000 wives... however in our society you are limited to 1 wife at a time.
(2)
(0)
SFC Greg Bruorton
SSG (Join to see) - It is unclear to me if the Fundamentalists claim more than one true wife as the laws recognize, but they do practice polygamy which is unlawful in all of the United States. They refer to their wives as wife#1, wife#2, etc with its own hierarchy.
What's more dangerous is that women are subjugated from early teen years and "expected" to marry a man sometimes twice her age. They live confined and closely regulated in all they do.
I find the practice abhorrent in the way their women are controlled and manipulated through the expectations of a false prophet.
False teachings of the Gospel of Jesus Christ is their platform regardless how they interpret the scriptures.
We are expected to obey the laws of the land; the Fundamentalists clearly do not.
I appreciate your comments.
What's more dangerous is that women are subjugated from early teen years and "expected" to marry a man sometimes twice her age. They live confined and closely regulated in all they do.
I find the practice abhorrent in the way their women are controlled and manipulated through the expectations of a false prophet.
False teachings of the Gospel of Jesus Christ is their platform regardless how they interpret the scriptures.
We are expected to obey the laws of the land; the Fundamentalists clearly do not.
I appreciate your comments.
(0)
(0)
SSG (Join to see)
SFC Greg Bruorton - If they insist that they have multiple legal wives, then they are breaking the law. If they only claimed one legal wife and several life partners, I don't believe the law would have any grounds to say anything. My point is that the legal hangup is really nothing more than semantics. From a religious perspective it should be irrelevant how secular society classifies or does not classify the relationship.
(0)
(0)
SFC Greg Bruorton
SSG (Join to see) - If only we could explain your narrative to those imprisoned for years for practicing polygamy before Congress passed the law for the Church in Utah. Even after the law was passed, members of the Church were imprisoned as they tried to extricate themselves from wives and children that were dear to them.
The President of the Church at the time, Wilford Woodruff, had prayed much to the Lord about the dilemma the Church faced. As recorded as Official Declaration--1 in the Doctrine and Covenants of the Church, he and the Quorum of the Twelve unanimously approved of the new law and would abide by it. If not, the U.S. Government would raze the temples and churches to the ground and hence the saving ordinances would be placed in jeopardy.
The President of the Church at the time, Wilford Woodruff, had prayed much to the Lord about the dilemma the Church faced. As recorded as Official Declaration--1 in the Doctrine and Covenants of the Church, he and the Quorum of the Twelve unanimously approved of the new law and would abide by it. If not, the U.S. Government would raze the temples and churches to the ground and hence the saving ordinances would be placed in jeopardy.
(0)
(0)
SSG (Join to see)
SFC Greg Bruorton - There are people living and practicing alternative family arrangements around the country with no legal issues. The primary difference is only one person gets the title of legal husband or wife. Trump is on his third wife, if the other two moved in with him again it's not like they would be breaking the law... even though only one had legal status.
There were some serious problems with separation of Church and State back when the government was persecuting Mormons.
There were some serious problems with separation of Church and State back when the government was persecuting Mormons.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google