Posted on Aug 17, 2021
PO2 Air Traffic Controller
21.1K
926
340
55
55
0
The case itself is about Anthrax however, if the Covid vaccine is being used for anything other than what is on the label that is pending FDA approval, does that make it unlawful under the references in the court case about Experimental Drugs / Emergency Use Drugs??? The court case is on the premises of federal law (10 U.S.C. § 1107), Presidential Executive Order (Executive Order 13139), & DoD Directive 6200.2.
Avatar feed
Responses: 55
Lt Col John (Jack) Christensen
52
52
0
Quit looking for outs and get vaccinated! Your other option is getting sicker than hell and perhaps meeting some ICU nurses who care more about your health than you.
(52)
Comment
(0)
TSgt Larry Johnson
TSgt Larry Johnson
24 h
Capt Gregory Prickett - I was there during that time, and after the Air Force deaths, it came out that no one did full testing on the drug, and all the mandatory requirements were dropped for a couple more years.
(1)
Reply
(0)
CPO William Slifko
CPO William Slifko
22 h
SSG Richard Stull - I understand your concern given the history of drug manufacturing companies to put profit over human life. On the other hand, the current vaccines are mRNA vaccines which essentially teach your body to create a protein that triggers an immune response. This is quite different from other vaccines you've had particularly in that there is a much greater potential that mRNA vaccines will have serious side effects which makes the length of testing much shorter than traditional vaccines. I hope you will read the information at this website:
https://www.vumc.org/viiii/infographics/how-does-mrna-vaccine-compare-traditional-vaccine
It gives a very good picture of the differences between mRNA and traditional vaccines.
(1)
Reply
(0)
CPO William Slifko
CPO William Slifko
22 h
CPO William Slifko - This is quite different from other vaccines you've had particularly in that there is a much greater potential that mRNA vaccines will **not** have serious side effects which makes the length of testing much shorter than traditional vaccines.

Apologies for the mistake in the original comment.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SPC Charles Head
SPC Charles Head
18 h
Tell them to stick that crap where the Sun doesn't shine.
It doesn't work anyway, why the Giant posh to get this crap in everyone except all the Illegals crossing the Southern Border?
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Intelligence Analyst
26
26
0
Edited 4 mo ago
What order? There is no order mandating DoD personnel to get the covid vaccine at this moment.

It's supposed to have full certification by end of August/beginning of September. The memo issued by SECDEF said that there needs to be a plan in place by 15 September OR whenever full certification happens - whichever comes first.

Also who is using the covid vaccine for anything other than what the EUA authorizes it for?

The military mandating the covid vaccine will not be "unlawful." You have a choice like everyone else - either you get it when it's mandated OR you can face UCMJ. You can ETS if you're close to your ETS. There's choices.
(26)
Comment
(0)
Cpl Benjamin Long
Cpl Benjamin Long
2 mo
Courts decide what is lawful not a mandate from a commander.
(4)
Reply
(0)
Cpl Benjamin Long
Cpl Benjamin Long
2 mo
Also people don't Face ucmj... Punitive action is typical a court martial, which is a court hearing... And the court doesn't always rule in your favor, and is subject to scrutiny of higher courts and the supreme court if they wish it.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SSgt Chuck “Gunz” Gundlach USMC Ret., MBA
SSgt Chuck “Gunz” Gundlach USMC Ret., MBA
3 d
That choice you mention, is cohesion, when their is a penalty if you don’t take the other supposed choice…
(0)
Reply
(0)
SSgt Chuck “Gunz” Gundlach USMC Ret., MBA
SSgt Chuck “Gunz” Gundlach USMC Ret., MBA
3 d
Cpl Benjamin Long - …and they have, it’s now in the hands of the courts…
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Capt Gregory Prickett
25
25
0
What Supreme Court case? Doe v Rumsfeld never made it to the Supreme Court. Hell, it never made it through the Circuit Court of Appeals, as the FDA changed the label use to include the one the military was using it for.

The decision was a trial court decision, so it's not precedent. You'll have to take the shot.
(25)
Comment
(0)
CWO3 Us Marine
CWO3 (Join to see)
4 mo
Thanks. I didn't bother to check.
(2)
Reply
(0)
1SG Terry Folsom
1SG Terry Folsom
1 mo
I'm glad someone answered his actual question.
(3)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close