Posted on Feb 26, 2015
SFC Josh Jackson
311K
4.19K
638
309
308
1
D3936f88
Hello, my people! I was recently asked to provide input on an NCOER we're writing for an E-6 who recently transferred to our shop. His losing unit did not write him an outgoing NCOER, so of course it falls on us to pick up the pieces.

The losing unit sang his praises, offering gushing adoration for this guy. But when we pressed them for bullets, they were unable to come up with anything concrete. Their failure to point to specific accomplishments more or less matches our observation of him.

He's a guy that would probably do well if we still had SP6 as a rank. So when my counterpart (his new rater) asked for bullets, this was my tongue-in-cheek reply:

* Can successfully inhale and exhale in sequence without supervision
* Routinely laces boots without causing loss of circulation to feet
* Surfs social media on his cellphone better than any other E-6 I've observed
* Maintains steady temperature in whatever chair he is occupying

So I thought I'd throw this topic out to all of you. Any humorous evaluation comments you've seen, or wish you could've included in writing one? Please share!
Posted in these groups: 1024px smiley.svg HumorEvaluations logo Evaluations1efa5058 NCOERBilde2 OER
Avatar feed
Responses: 401
PO1 Michael Bruner
0
0
0
"This sailor's incompetency has reached lows not previously believed possible. Recommend for mandatory vasectomy."
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Christopher Fulbright
0
0
0
Consistently sets low standards, then fails to meet them.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
CPO William A. Bullard Jr.
0
0
0
Writing evaluations today is a far cry from fifty years ago; it's a rodeo in bullshittery. From "O"s to NCOs, it's all the same, bullshit. WShen i first came into the Navy in '61, if you went to Mast you a were automatically 2.8 on the 4.0 scale then. To get Gold hashmarks you had to have at least 3.4 or better for two or more reporting cycles after twelve years. If you were 3.2 you were a good sailor and you were doing everything expected of you. There were damned few 3.6s [damned few] almost no 3.8s.; 4.0s were simply unheard of. This a
(0)
Comment
(0)
CPO William A. Bullard Jr.
CPO William A. Bullard Jr.
>1 y
This all went to bullshittery when the active fleet, surface and subsurface began to draw down. Now you have the final proof of the pudding here. The former command did not do their job and say the guy was marginal or shit sandwich because that would have put them on report.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Healthcare Specialist (Combat Medic)
0
0
0
This NCO is currently robbing a village of it's idiot
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SP6 John Washburn
0
0
0
Consistently sets low standards for self and persistently fails to meet them.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
LTC Battalion Commander
0
0
0
This officer is destined to through life pushing on doors that are clearly marked pull.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
CPT Roger Taylor
0
0
0
‘Continually fails to meet the exceedingly low standards he sets for himself and those under his command’
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
1SG Steven Imerman
0
0
0
I have heard this said about certain NCOs at various times, but never saw it on an evaluation-

"Couldn't lead a hungry private to the messhall."
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
CPT Jeff Robinette
0
0
0
An old but goody; "This Officer consistently fails to meet the exceeding LOW standards he his set for himself!"
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
PO2 Anthony Cruz
0
0
0
This officer is like a gyroscope, in constant motion but never really going anywhere.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close