309
308
1
Hello, my people! I was recently asked to provide input on an NCOER we're writing for an E-6 who recently transferred to our shop. His losing unit did not write him an outgoing NCOER, so of course it falls on us to pick up the pieces.
The losing unit sang his praises, offering gushing adoration for this guy. But when we pressed them for bullets, they were unable to come up with anything concrete. Their failure to point to specific accomplishments more or less matches our observation of him.
He's a guy that would probably do well if we still had SP6 as a rank. So when my counterpart (his new rater) asked for bullets, this was my tongue-in-cheek reply:
* Can successfully inhale and exhale in sequence without supervision
* Routinely laces boots without causing loss of circulation to feet
* Surfs social media on his cellphone better than any other E-6 I've observed
* Maintains steady temperature in whatever chair he is occupying
So I thought I'd throw this topic out to all of you. Any humorous evaluation comments you've seen, or wish you could've included in writing one? Please share!
The losing unit sang his praises, offering gushing adoration for this guy. But when we pressed them for bullets, they were unable to come up with anything concrete. Their failure to point to specific accomplishments more or less matches our observation of him.
He's a guy that would probably do well if we still had SP6 as a rank. So when my counterpart (his new rater) asked for bullets, this was my tongue-in-cheek reply:
* Can successfully inhale and exhale in sequence without supervision
* Routinely laces boots without causing loss of circulation to feet
* Surfs social media on his cellphone better than any other E-6 I've observed
* Maintains steady temperature in whatever chair he is occupying
So I thought I'd throw this topic out to all of you. Any humorous evaluation comments you've seen, or wish you could've included in writing one? Please share!
Posted 9 y ago
Responses: 401
"This sailor's incompetency has reached lows not previously believed possible. Recommend for mandatory vasectomy."
(0)
(0)
Writing evaluations today is a far cry from fifty years ago; it's a rodeo in bullshittery. From "O"s to NCOs, it's all the same, bullshit. WShen i first came into the Navy in '61, if you went to Mast you a were automatically 2.8 on the 4.0 scale then. To get Gold hashmarks you had to have at least 3.4 or better for two or more reporting cycles after twelve years. If you were 3.2 you were a good sailor and you were doing everything expected of you. There were damned few 3.6s [damned few] almost no 3.8s.; 4.0s were simply unheard of. This a
(0)
(0)
CPO William A. Bullard Jr.
This all went to bullshittery when the active fleet, surface and subsurface began to draw down. Now you have the final proof of the pudding here. The former command did not do their job and say the guy was marginal or shit sandwich because that would have put them on report.
(0)
(0)
Consistently sets low standards for self and persistently fails to meet them.
(0)
(0)
This officer is destined to through life pushing on doors that are clearly marked pull.
(0)
(0)
‘Continually fails to meet the exceedingly low standards he sets for himself and those under his command’
(0)
(0)
I have heard this said about certain NCOs at various times, but never saw it on an evaluation-
"Couldn't lead a hungry private to the messhall."
"Couldn't lead a hungry private to the messhall."
(0)
(0)
An old but goody; "This Officer consistently fails to meet the exceeding LOW standards he his set for himself!"
(0)
(0)
This officer is like a gyroscope, in constant motion but never really going anywhere.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next