Posted on Nov 24, 2020
Has anyone had a successful claim for JP4 exposure?
940
0
1
0
0
0
Lots of information on the effects of JP4 and it is so hazardous that the AF has replaced it with JP8. I have a number of health problems that are associated with JP4 exposure and could use all the help I can get. Thanks in advance for any helpful advice.
Posted 4 y ago
Responses: 1
That is 100% incorrect information. JP4 was replaced because of its low-flash point and vulnerability to fires while transporting through pipes. JP4 was notorious for conducting static electricity in pipes which caused numerous fires and explosions. JP-8 was introduced with a higher flashpoint and lower freeze point making it ideal for both military and commercial use. The effects of JP8 are the same or similar to that of JP4. The CDC put out a 150 page report that states numerous times that the effects of JP4/JP8 on human health were minimal and caused no long term health effects. There is also no evidence to prove that the chemicals associated with JP4/JP8 cause cancer or any long term health conditions.
https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/ToxProfiles/tp76.pdf#:~:text=Exposure%20to%20some%20components%20might%20occur%20from%20air,They%20might%20also%20spill%20some%20on%20their%20skin.
https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/ToxProfiles/tp76.pdf#:~:text=Exposure%20to%20some%20components%20might%20occur%20from%20air,They%20might%20also%20spill%20some%20on%20their%20skin.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next