Posted on Jul 7, 2014
COL Vincent Stoneking
3.81K
27
19
5
5
0
In reviewing job applications today, I decided that it might be worthwhile to point out self-inflicted damage I see on a sadly regular basis. I'll update as I notice things. Feel free to add your own.

- "Can we contact this employer? No."
My spidey-sense is going off like the 4th of July. You have issues at your current place of employ, are about to be fired, or are generally held in low regard.

What is that you say? You don't want to telegraph that you are looking? Pretty much all employers get that you don't want to spill the beans to your current employer. And we wouldn't call them until after we interviewed you in the first place. If THAT is your reason, knock it off.

Moreover, if you do well in the interview, we are going to require that you sign a release (or give verbal permission, in other organizations, I guess) to check references/background - and that is ALL references that we can find, not just the ones you listed. You'd better believe we are going to contact the one where the red flags went up!!

That is IF you get the interview in the first place. Unless your resume & cover are exceptionally strong - or the candidate pool sucks, you may have just talked yourself out of an interview. Just because there is smoke doesn't mean there is fire, but it's the smart/safe way to bet.
Posted in these groups: K14817871 Resume
Avatar feed
Responses: 10
SSgt Chris Taylor
2
2
0
Perhaps there is a different way to view this challenge? What if the way we are looking for talent is broken, altogether? What if the interview process doesn't really result in the best fit for the company? What if the systems we are using constrain the ability for talent to find work, and companies to find talent?

LTC Stoneking's example is an interesting one; if I were unhappy in a job and were looking, why would I want you to talk to my supervisor, who, in fact, actually values my work quite a bit so that I have to deal with him while I interview with you?

The talent-opportunity continuum is broken, and has been for many, many years. We value process over eliciting the real value an individual adds.

If someone lies on their resume, that is a red flag, but what if the current system simply doesn't see them because they didn't use the right keyword?

There is a far, far better way to get exceptional veteran talent into great organizations - 15-second reviews of resumes will not lead us there.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Brian Paine
2
2
0
Another thing I really do not like is when a potential employee inflates their job descriptions with other companies for me to just find out what they actually are skilled at and they lied on their application. I have seen way too many resumes from veterans that inflate their job skills beyond what they actually know.
(2)
Comment
(0)
CPT All Source Intelligence
CPT (Join to see)
>1 y
Exactly! Hey, I'm a Soldier too and I can look at your unit and rank and guess your role. If a SPC tries to make him/herself sound like the company commander, it's an immediate turn off. I no longer believe a word of what I am reading! Vets should not assume that they are only dealing with civilians.
(2)
Reply
(0)
COL Vincent Stoneking
COL Vincent Stoneking
>1 y
CPT (Join to see) that's another good one right there. And I have seen it with vets E4-E6 whose resumes sound like they were the 1SG/Co CDR and BN S3 and S1 all rolled into one. (I haven't seen this on O resumes, for whatever reason. I'm sure it's just dumb luck and I will over time.)
(0)
Reply
(0)
SGT Brian Paine
SGT Brian Paine
>1 y
If you are a vet or soon to be separated, be honest with the would be employer. You have earn their trust. Make them believe in you and that you would make an integral part of their team. You may not be the best, but the employer will take your honesty and integrity onto question and I can almost guarantee 9 out of 10 times that employer is going to take a second look.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Brian Paine
2
2
0
I run into this all the time. After a few prying questions I find that most do not want their employer contacted due to retaliation. In other words the current employer either threatens to cut their hours, fire them, and/or tells the company that is calling that sm is a terrible employee just so they can keep them there. Most companies feel that they have spent time and money on an employee training them to work for them, not someone else. I admit I am skeptical about a would be employee if they say I can not contact their current employer.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
Avatar feed
Headspace and timing errors in the job search
1SG Chris Brown
2
2
0
I understand that someone might not want their current employer to know they are looking for a job. However, how else is a potential employer to find out about your job performance? I know your mom and wife and friends are going to tell me what a great person and hard worker you are, so why would I need to talk to them much? I've had people listing their friends as references on applications to my organization and had to let them know I need professional references. Your current employer is about as close as I can get to finding out what kind of worker you are today. So totally agree with you that anyone who puts that it's not ok to contact their employer on their resume is probably trying to hide something.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
1px xxx
Suspended Profile
Instead of putting 'No', put 'Contact me first'. This lets the employer know that you want to give your manager a heads-up.
Cpl Jonathan Nicodemus
1
1
0
Sir, thanks for this!! I have been putting 'No' on all my applications, for that exact reason--I do not want my current employer to know I'm looking for a different job until I have something lined up.
That being said, I'll quit checking 'No' now.
Thanks again.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
LCDR Doug Nordman
1
1
0
Maybe you guys have your noses too close to the process. How does that question help you find a better candidate? Perhaps they're just randomly answering "No" without considering the issues. Do you have so many great candidates that you want to ditch one just on that randomness alone?

I've never had a "real" job (let alone looked for one) but if you're not getting the info you want from the "May we contact your employer?" question, then it's time to ask a different question like "May we contact previous employers (other than your current one)?" or just include a statement saying "After you interview with us, we may want to confirm your employment with your current employer."

Why contact the current employer in the first place? As a landlord seeking new tenants I never contact the tenants' current landlord. That landlord might praise their tenants to the skies in order to get rid of them without a messy lease termination or even eviction. So it seems that the only useful info you'd get from a current employer would be to confirm job title and dates of employment.
(1)
Comment
(0)
LCDR Doug Nordman
LCDR Doug Nordman
>1 y
Aloha e komo mai Hawaii! August sounds great, and lunch does too! I have a meeting on the afternoon of Fri 22nd but the rest of the month is clear.

Very few servicemembers or veterans have had a chance to learn about the math behind financial independence. It's not easy, but it's surprisingly straightforward. Our military skills give us a great boost on achieving it.

By the way if you're a surfer then I'd be happy to lend you a longboard & rashguard. If you're not yet a surfer, I'd be happy to help you paddle out at my favorite break (White Plains Beach in Kalaeloa by Kapolei) and show you how.

For the rest of you RallyPoint members reading this post, it's my standard offer to Oahu's military residents & visitors. I like to show people how to surf, and if you can swim then you can learn to ride a wave...
(1)
Reply
(0)
COL Vincent Stoneking
COL Vincent Stoneking
>1 y
Doug, I don't surf, but would love to learn! I'll happily take you up on it. Thank you on both counts, very hospitable!

I don't know my exact schedule yet, but should be around from about the 9th/10th through the end of the month, and should have at least the weekends of the 16th/17th and 30th/31st free. I could make assumptions about shifts, but we know how that goes in the military. I'll message you when we are a bit closer and I know my actual schedule.
(1)
Reply
(0)
LCDR Doug Nordman
LCDR Doug Nordman
>1 y
You're welcome; see you next month!
(0)
Reply
(0)
COL Vincent Stoneking
COL Vincent Stoneking
>1 y
To be fair, I encountered a new one on an application I was filling out the other day. They had "yes", "No", and "Not Yet."

I thought that was an elegant approach.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
MSG Wade Huffman
1
1
0
Excellent points, Sir. Employment is at one of the most competitive points in most of our lives and you are correct that many end up shutting themselves out of a job (or better job) due to some of the issues you listed.
In my geographic area, statistic show that on average employers received approximately 300-500 applications for every vacancy. I know if I were a hiring manager, I'd be looking for any easy way to 'cull the heard' quickly.
(1)
Comment
(0)
COL Vincent Stoneking
COL Vincent Stoneking
>1 y
Exactly. In staff-speak, I use screening an evaluative criteria.
Screening: "Let's cut this huge stack of applications to a manageable number"
Evaluative: "Let's see if I can find a good candidate."

In that order.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
COL Randall Cudworth
1
1
0
How about those that don't list 'minor' things that have occurred that I'm going to find out about five minutes after I take a bit deeper look (that's assuming your resume caught my eye and I dug a bit deeper).
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
CDR Kenneth Kaiser
0
0
0
Many years ago I worked for a company. It was an Aerospace leader. It had so many exciting areas and product lines it should have been a great place to work. It was one of the worst. As an aerospace firm they reduced the number of paid holidays and you were given two weeks of at Christmas so they could shut down, re tool and other things. However this was the time for the Christmas goose. They would lay off folks at that point to avoid paying them the two weeks. They hired young engineers out of college and would pay their moving costs. In return the new engineers had to work for the company for 1 1/2 years. The work conditions were so bad that many would quit one day beyond that 1 1/2 year point so the result was a bathtub manning curve, (i.e. a lot of young folks with less than 1 12 years experience and a lot of senior folks hanging on for retirement. If you tried to look for work with another group within the company or God forbid another company and they found out you were told if you want another job have at it and you were fired so the company particularly on the internal openings would loose qualified workers just on spite.

The point is that as a company or employer, you strive to keep your folks if they are good. However if someone is trying to escape and make themselves better and the current company does not want to recognize them, then of course I would not want you contacting my current employer. That would be like broadcasting your exit strategy. Oh wait, we did that. How did that work out?
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close