Posted on Apr 3, 2014
LTC Yinon Weiss
27.7K
416
172
16
16
0
Given the recent active shooter tragedy that happened at Fort Hood, how do you believe the military should best respond to help prevent future events from happening, and also casualties should they happen?
Posted in these groups: Activeshooter Active ShooterImages Security
Avatar feed
See Results
Responses: 77
CW2 Humint Technician
0
0
0
Allow people to carry weapons. 
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Instructor/Writer
0
0
0
We have to do certifications for everything else, why not have a concealed carry cerification for Military Installations? Get certified and then you can carry, must do an annual certification. We have to do Computer based training, why not do something like NRA Certifcations?
(0)
Comment
(0)
SGM Mike Bachini
SGM Mike Bachini
10 y
The gorilla in the room is that actual laws the Government has in place regarding the military. I am not a lawyer but there are a few on rallypoint that may explain it better. My knowledged, which I will say up front may not be correct is this.

1. Title 10 military cannot walk armed around the civilians. If they armed all the NCO's and Officers with a side arm it would be the same thing. This isn't about responsible gun owners or the fact that some people are trained and could properly use it during a situation. 2. Downrange there are issues everyday with Soldiers and NCO's and Officers losing their weapon, their CCO, their ammunition. There is no way the government is going to let our CONSISTENT negligence (even on a small level) happen in the states.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SFC Counterintelligence (CI) Agent
SFC (Join to see)
10 y
MSG, with all due respect, who told you that military members can't walk around in the civilian population armed???  There is no fact to that in any way.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Shop Foreman
0
0
0
Here is the problem with a CCW soldiers already can't shoot plus have ND on ranges I don't think they should be able to carry while at work. How ever I do see a need to arm our staff duties and CO areas where soldiers are living and spend a lot of time at. Maybe even extend the mp's roving guard to some of those areas.
(0)
Comment
(0)
SFC Instructor/Writer
SFC (Join to see)
10 y
<p>SGT Tannehill,</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>You would rather have some Joe Blow on SD or CQ carry a weapon, than a RESPONSIBLE GUN OWNER, who has been certified and trained? Sorry i dont agree. Plus MPs are shorthanded as it is, how are they going to provide roving&nbsp;patrols?</p>
(2)
Reply
(0)
CPT Intelligence Exercise Planner
CPT (Join to see)
10 y
<p>SGT Tannehill,</p><p>Easily fixed with a requirement to register your intent to carry with the PMO and require a form that must be signed by your commander indicating that you have had no weapons related issues.&nbsp; Any future problems, such as a failure to qualify or an ND, would result in immediate revocation of your right to carry on post.</p><p>And PLEASE do not respond that this would be too much of a hassle.&nbsp; We now require Soldiers to fill out an online risk assessment, get a POV inspection, and attend at least two mandatory safety briefings (company, battalion, and sometimes brigade) before we let them leave for a four day weekend!&nbsp; I think we can handle the small percentage that have done the work to attain a CCW.</p>
(1)
Reply
(0)
SSG Daniel Deiler
SSG Daniel Deiler
10 y
Don't forget the mandatory mentor led motorcycle rides and all the hoops to jump through that comes with 2 wheeled motorized recreation.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Anthony Schoepp
0
0
0
Not only do the mental health screenings need to be evaluated but also the way they are administered. Anyone with even a little bit of experience can see where the questions are going and can skim through without getting caught.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Michael Hasbun
0
0
0
All of the above.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
CPT Richard Riley
0
0
0
I agree that all of the choices are viable. I would tend to say picking one does not diminish any of the other choices but does show a priority pecking order of sorts. The admin is outstanding & good to see input-result=function.
(0)
Comment
(0)
SSG Bn Tasking Nco Bn Sharp
SSG (Join to see)
10 y
I say SDNCOs should be issued a sidearm and that weapon is copper stranded over the hammer and is signed each day to the oncoming SDNCO. I would also say that motorpool entrances should be guarded by armed guards while the motorpool is open for business. The motorpool has the highest volume of soldiers during command maintenance days outside of the the DFAC and Food Courts, where MPs shoud patrol durinig high volume times.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SGT James Elphick
0
0
0
I should add that while I voted for arming service members, I have a discussion going about it being the NCO or Officer on duty at the Company level and higher
(0)
Comment
(0)
SSG Bn Tasking Nco Bn Sharp
SSG (Join to see)
10 y
I agree with you SGT Elphick, Staff Duty desks are the first thing in a BN HQ that visitors run into before being allowed to proceed to their intended location.  During off hours Staff Duty NCOs and SDOs should be armed. the weapons should be copper stranded so that the weapon isn't played with by those on duty and if the strand is broken weapon inspected by the next on duty then the Staff Duty will be held accountable. I also believe that the Motor Pool should be guarded by armed Soldiers and everyone signs in and out. Strictly enforce this and it works. 
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close