Posted on Mar 25, 2022
LTC Ray Buenteo
8.81K
124
45
17
17
0
“Following a three year review the Army has scrapped plans to use the same physical fitness test for all soldiers, choosing instead to have reduced standards to allow all women and older soldiers to pass.” Announced March 23, 2022.
Posted in these groups: Imgres Physical TrainingLogo no word s FitnessIncreasingmoraleretention Morale
Avatar feed
Responses: 20
SGM Legislative Liaison
12
12
0
This is nothing more than Army leadership failing to acknowledge sunk costs on what was always a highly flawed test since inception. Instead of pulling the plug, like what happens in hundreds of failed RDT&E projects, Big Army doubles down on the program to avoid embarrassment. Now they don’t even claim it is an assessment of “combat readiness”, which was the whole point of the new test in the first place.
(12)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
MSG Intermediate Care Technician
11
11
0
I see it as the Army finally saw some common sense in that not every single Soldier is made the same. Some great at running...others not so much. Others are great at push ups...others not so much. And while the standards may be "lowered," it is still up to the Soldier to pass the events. Having done the 3 event test for years.....and now the ACFT, I can say that the new test....while with newer/updated standards....will kick your six.
(11)
Comment
(0)
MSG Intermediate Care Technician
MSG (Join to see)
4 y
SPC (Join to see) - Try having to do the SDC while having achilles tendon issues. No fun. I barely make time.
(3)
Reply
(0)
SFC Instructor
SFC (Join to see)
4 y
MSG (Join to see) - For us, the older generation, if we don't warm up or stretch enough we may end up with a torn calf...on the SDC
(3)
Reply
(0)
MSG Intermediate Care Technician
MSG (Join to see)
4 y
SFC (Join to see) - That's no bullshit right there.
(3)
Reply
(0)
SPC Member
SPC (Join to see)
4 y
Agreed, getting older sucks, stretching and ibuprofen is life now.
(5)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Retention Operations Nco
6
6
0
It's kind of a no-brainer. If physical fitness standards are part of promotion evaluation, and one group biologically will always score lower than another, then you have just disadvantaged one group and opened up a class action lawsuit.

The Army either had to get rid of PT standards in promotions or make them more fair. Some of the standard are the same for women and men, and some are not. Anyone who expects the majority of women to deadlift 340 pounds is ridiculous, especially when you consider how many younger females in the Army weigh under 150 pounds. If a woman who weighs 100 pounds deadlifts 180, while a guy who weighs 200 deadlifts 300, by most athletic standards the woman has outlifted the man by body weight percentage.

As for this being a combat test, how many people who have successfully deployed as an Intel, commo, HR, transportation, supply person have had to drag a 200 pound person or deadlift 300 pound? Very, very few. Not enough that the promotions of every support MOS should be heavily influenced by it.

Also, I would like to point out that the male standards really did not drop with age. Once you hit about 50, sure the max drops. But when you're 50 your PT score is not a factor for promotion between you and your other 50 year old peers.
(6)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
Avatar feed
How do you feel about the army reducing physical fitness standards for females and older soldiers?
SFC Casey O'Mally
5
5
0
Sir,

If over 90% of troops in a given category (Female, over 40, National Guard, etc.) can pass the existing fitness standard and less than 60% in that same category can pass the new standard, chances are pretty good that the problem isn't the troops, it is the standard.

Now, you can argue whether the problem is that the existing standard is too "soft" or the new standard is too hard. But either way, the problem is the standard not the troops. We have told these Soldiers - and our Recruiters, Drill Sergeants, and IET Commanders - what "fit" is. If previously "fit" Soldiers become "unfit" overnight - in mass quantities - then something is rotten in the state of Denmark.
(5)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SGM Bill Frazer
3
3
0
Damn Sir, they have always had scoring on a scale based on age.
(3)
Comment
(0)
LTC Ray Buenteo
LTC Ray Buenteo
4 y
Yes but now it’s not about soldiers meeting a standard now it’s a standard meeting the soldier
(0)
Reply
(0)
MAJ Operations Officer
MAJ (Join to see)
4 y
I know after 23 years, I feel every joint, every morning. I am relieved my 44 yo body isn’t held to the same standard as an 18 yo! They cut me some slack on the height/weight, why not for fitness standards?
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CPT Consultant
2
2
0
A62af37
Fb56062
And an excerpt from the Daily Mail article @ link. And —> an interesting/troubling read.

“... Secretary of the Army Christine Wormuth, the first woman to lead the armed forces branch, said during her confirmation hearing that she planned to revamp the fitness test with an eye to closing the gender gap...”

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10645629/Woke-army-introduces-new-easier-combat-fitness-test-women-armed-forces.html
(2)
Comment
(0)
LTC Ray Buenteo
LTC Ray Buenteo
4 y
Lol. A mile will not be any shorter and 100lbs will not be less heavier to accommodate the gender gap.
(1)
Reply
(0)
CPT Consultant
CPT (Join to see)
4 y
SFC Bernard Walko - The only answer I can provide = [REDACTED].
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
MSgt Electrical Power Production
2
2
0
I assume they are having trouble with retention and Covid didn’t help. I suppose you have to do something to keep the numbers up. But as an offshoot it could affect morale good and bad.
(2)
Comment
(0)
LTC Ray Buenteo
LTC Ray Buenteo
4 y
The purpose of the physical fitness program is to develop the fitness of the soldier to the standard not set the standard to the fitness of the soldier.
(1)
Reply
(0)
MSgt Electrical Power Production
MSgt (Join to see)
4 y
LTC Ray Buenteo - I agree, but the Army, Hell the whole damn military does some strange things. Not a whole Hell of a lot we can do about it.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CPT Lawrence Cable
1
1
0
Am I missing something? While the pass and 100 percent standard for women changed drastically, it just looks like the eliminated the categories on the Men's side. Didn't see a lot of difference in the scoring until you hit the above 40 group.
I never had a problem with the gender scoring systems of the APFT. I did have a problem with the Army having a separate PT Standard and claiming the female soldiers are the physical equal of the male soldiers.
(1)
Comment
(0)
CPT Lawrence Cable
CPT Lawrence Cable
4 y
SFC Kelly Fuerhoff - The Israelis have tried that twice, with the same results. Higher injury rates, lower overall physical and unit performance. As far as I know, no female has maxed the ACFT, only 66 have scored over 500 points.
The Army wants females in a Light Infantry unit, but they can't make the same scores as their male counterparts. How do you think that goes over in the Squad?
https://www.military.com/daily-news/2021/05/10/nearly-half-of-female-soldiers-still-failing-new-army-fitness-test-while-males-pass-easily.html#:~:text=Only%2066%20female%20soldiers%20scored%20500%20points%20or,on%20women%20has%20caught%20the%20attention%20of%20lawmakers.?msclkid=833fd5a8ac7311ecb27413379e4424dd
(1)
Reply
(0)
CPT Lawrence Cable
CPT Lawrence Cable
4 y
LTC Ray Buenteo - I understand that, does the Army?
(1)
Reply
(0)
CPT Lawrence Cable
CPT Lawrence Cable
4 y
SFC Kelly Fuerhoff - We've had this discussion for a number of years now and I doubt that either will change our mind. I would think the "Transgender women" athletes would be enough to show the real difference in physical performance. Lia Thomas ranked somewhere above 400 as a male swimmer, dominates at a "woman". Back from my martial arts days, Lucia Rijker was undisputed Women's Champion Kickboxer, had four titles. Fought a unranked amateur man named Somchai Jaidee in an exhibition fight, got knocked out in the second round.
The point of that is that Top Women Athletes compete at the level of their Average Male counterparts.. I agree that in most of the jobs in the Army, that doesn't make much difference, but it does in some. Infantry and I would include Armor, I've busted track on an M60 and it can kick the butt of the whole crew. Yes, men wash out of both units all the time, but not at the same rate when the physical standards are the same.
(1)
Reply
(0)
CPT Lawrence Cable
CPT Lawrence Cable
4 y
SFC Bernard Walko - Kind of my point. I served in Divisional Combat Engineer units in the Guard, which at that time still had the CEV and AVLB's, as well as the M113's. Even a day of track maintenance on the M113 could be a long and back breaking job, the M60 and M48 (yes, I had a M48 Chassis AVLB in my Company) were a workout.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Sgt Allen Wyman
0
0
0
Not trying to make light of the situation here, but being physically fit in the military is not just to look good in uniform, it is essential in being able to carry your weight and be a working part of the combat unit. My belief is that all should remain as physically fit as possible, so they can carry their load. Thank you.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SFC David Ocasio
0
0
0
Where were all these so called experts in 1981. I guess no one cared about our welfare. Hey by the way it did us good. Lowering the standard brings less qualified people in my opinion. I thought when someone joined the military they were to adapt to the standards not the other way around
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close