Posted on Mar 29, 2024
1LT Chaplain Candidate
23.4K
128
62
30
30
0
I am writing a research paper. In it, I will refer to one of my friends. I'm not in the SOF world so I just want to get this right. Keep in mind, the paper is for civilians, so the exact language doesn't need to be precise, just respectful.

I want to say "with one of my colleagues, an Army Ranger in an infantry battalion down the road, admitting to me..."
Edited >1 y ago
Avatar feed
Responses: 25
1SG First Sergeant
2
2
0
Great question. Are you a Ranger if not assigned to a Ranger unit or a Ranger position on the UMR? If not, would you be say a Ranger qualified infantry/armor/intelligence officer?
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
MAJ Ronnie Reams
2
2
0
How are LRRPs, manned, these days? I think they are called LRS today. We had M Company, 75th with the 199th. They took companies from the 75th and attached to Infantry units of Division and separate brigades. MACV had a school to qualify them because they had to be airborne rangers. Because they lived a life of love and danger. :-) Do they still do that?
(2)
Comment
(0)
1px xxx
Suspended Profile
>1 y
Correct--LRS is the current naming. SOF units have organic LRS capabilities and so do BFSBs (Battlefield Surveillance Brigades) to support the non-SOF Army.
Avatar small
SFC Special Forces Communications Sergeant
1
1
0
Easy. If they served in Ranger Regiment, they are a Ranger.
If they just went to the school, they are Ranger Qualified.
(1)
Comment
(0)
MAJ Tex Hall
MAJ Tex Hall
>1 y
not so, buckwheat :)
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SP6 Bradford Caldwell
1
1
0
Someone needs to go back to school and learn how to write. It's would, not yould.
(1)
Comment
(0)
1LT Chaplain Candidate
1LT (Join to see)
>1 y
I don't know yhat you mean!
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SP5 Peter Keane
1
1
0
How does your friend "down the road" look at it ?
(1)
Comment
(0)
1LT Chaplain Candidate
1LT (Join to see)
>1 y
Unable to reach him at the moment.
(1)
Reply
(0)
1SG(P) Dean Mcbride (MPER) (SPHR)
1SG(P) Dean Mcbride (MPER) (SPHR)
>1 y
In Houston we have a monthly Special Forces / Ranger breakfast meet-up. The majority attending are no longer on active duty. We refer to the Non-Special Forces Rangers in attendance as "Rangers". Once a Ranger, always a Ranger (similar to the Marines!). It does not matter if they are in the Regiment, retired, or finished their service and were discharged -- they are still Rangers. Those that wear "Triple Tabs" (Special Forces, Ranger, Airborne) are referred to as Green Berets, Special Operators, or Special Forces.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CPL Infantryman
0
0
0
As a former enlisted member who served both in the 1st Battalion, and also attended the Ranger School. The two are both mutually exclusive, and inclusive of the Ranger ethos. I served prior to the current regimental system, and as such my views are from that era. The members of my BN were some of the finest soldiers I ever knew and served with. We were trained to the level of excellence to perform the missions assigned to us, with professionalism and ability see the mission completed successfully. The Ranger School is the finest leadership course in the US military. It teach how to effectively lead under stressful situations, and how to perform specific patrolling missions. It is supposed to prepare EM's, NCO's and officers with the knowledge to return to their units and train their subordinates an peers in these techniques, as well as how to establish and maintain a standard that is higher than just "the standard". Individuals who are assigned to Ranger BN's learn this as well, but over a longer time. I will close this by saying that at my last NCO school attendance, my small group leader, during my graduation counseling, reminded me to be a Ranger Tab bearer, not a Tab wearer. This was the reminder of the training of the force mentioned above, to my subordinates as well as my peers.
AATW, RLTW!
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
LTC Reginald Brown
0
0
0
...one of my colleagues, who graduated from Ranger School in (year), and was assigned to an Infantry Battalion in (year)...
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SGT John Overby
0
0
0
Having been in the Signal Corps MOS and assigned to the 1st ID (Mech) I have always thought there is a distinct difference between being a Ranger and being Ranger qualified (JUST having been through Ranger school). I think there is a difference between knowing the skills and performing the skills. This became especially true to me after the "Blackhawk Down" situation and more so when my son-in-law joined the 1/75th and entered some combat situations. To me those men are Rangers and not JUST Ranger qualified.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SPC Vernon Leverett-El
0
0
0
mmmmmm
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
Capt Jeff S.
0
0
0
I would describe him as Ranger tabbed.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close