Posted on Apr 3, 2020
I received constructive credit for ANCOC Ph2 in June 2000. Why today does the Army Reserve think this does not count?
1.13K
3
6
0
0
0
Back in June 2000 I received "constructive credit" for ANCOC Ph2. The situation that I was in and the regulation NGR AR 600-200 (dated March 1997) was used and I was promoted and life went on. Now what happened to what is real close to 20 years ago, the Reserves wants to say that my "constructive credit" doesn't count. I only have received a verbal that it doesn't which by today's regulation I would guess so. But I know as most know when regulations change what was done previously is "grandfathered" so not to penalize soldiers for changes. In addition, no body has been able to tell me any Army Reserve regulation that says it can "ignore" what happened 20 years ago. They don't like it because on the ATRRS it shows me as a non-graduate as it should since my constructive credit was an admin action and not a schoolhouse action. This is really been a pain in the you know what. I mean it's like they they think they have a "say so" on what happened by regulation 20 years ago. What do you think?
Edited >1 y ago
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 2
One would think that as long as you have a training completion cert and the 1059, you would be good.
(1)
(0)
SFC (Join to see)
Correct, I have the memorandum to which was signed by the Deputy Chief of Staff, Personnel. It is / has been in my IPERMS. I have the 1059 for PH1. My situation was at "no fault" of the soldier (me) a PH2 was not offered in the two year window from PH1 so by regulation I was granted Constructive Credit for completion of ANCOC PH2.
(1)
(0)
MSG (Join to see)
SFC (Join to see) - Then you should be good to go. What brought this up after all this time?
(1)
(0)
SFC (Join to see)
I show up on the ATRRS list because ATRRS is a school house function and my issue is an admin action so in ATRRS it shows me not completed PH2.
(0)
(0)
0
0
0
I'm curious why this is suddenly an issue 20 years later. Also, who are "they"? There is no "they" in the Army, it's always a person speaking on behalf of an organization or department.
(0)
(0)
SFC (Join to see)
Your correct. However, my current chain of command says "They don't accept" my constructive credit that happened 20 years ago by regulation at that time.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google