Posted on Dec 1, 2014
SGM Senior Adviser, National Communications
35.6K
441
241
29
29
0
If you read Once an Eagle, you know the hero was up and down in permanent and temporary ranks based on the needs of the military...but you might not know that one of my personal heroes, Gen. Andrew Goodpaster (SACEUR) took a downgrade to 3- star rank to command his beloved West Point. If we had full mobilization or even partial mobilization, what about you?
Posted in these groups: Rank Rank
Avatar feed
Responses: 146
PO1 Scott VanBoskirk
0
0
0
The responses here are prety much in two camps, and those responding will either say they "want to die for their country" (Camp #1) and those who say they "are willing to die for their country" (Camp #2).

Those in Camp #1 follow orders blindly and follow their leaders blindly. They charge in not thinking about the consequences other than their leaders told them their country needed them.

Those in Camp #2 realize that their leaders are not worthy of blind followers and look to the Country before the leaders. They will be able to quickly discern those orders which are patently illegal and will question those that seem a bit off before they follow. They will also inspect their leaders to determine to the best of their ability whether those leaders are are in camp #1 or #2 and when questionable orders are received, will push back if they are not time-sensitive, or will follow those orders notifying their objections.

So the question is whether you will follow the leaders or follow the Constitution. One is a path to possible treason, the other is a path to patriotism.
(0)
Comment
(0)
CW2 Ernest Krutzsch
CW2 Ernest Krutzsch
11 y
My first 10 years were in the Infantry, there were some instances where following your leader blindly was beneficial, (If I said duck, because I saw a shell coming, I really don't have time to discuss it) I think the definition of blind trust is more a situation of trust in leadership. I had leaders I trusted and would follow anywhere, I also had some who I knew were doing things to benefit their career and were not beneficial to the troops or mission, those I would question.
(0)
Reply
(0)
PO1 Scott VanBoskirk
PO1 Scott VanBoskirk
11 y
I was mainly painting with a broad brush and there are always shades of grey. What I posted was a high level description to set the two ends of the spectrum where the majority resides.

And Ernest, blind following is in Camp #1 where blind trust would be more of Camp #2. Camp #1 just follows because they have been told to do so.
(0)
Reply
(0)
PO1 Scott VanBoskirk
PO1 Scott VanBoskirk
11 y
SGM, I DID have some excellent leaders and I built up trust in them. There were others that were poor leaders that I wouldn't trust could lead me out of the head without making me challenge their judgement. The leadership I currently have an issue with is the leadership out of DC. From ALL levels of it.

If we are to blindly follow any order coming out of DC right now, we are walking the line between being patriots and being traitors like a tightrope.

The Camp #1 people who follow their orders blindly are bordering on treason right now, but those who look at the orders given through the glasses of the US Constitution will be able to discern whether an order is legal or not and whether it is right and within the oath that we all took to disobey that order, obey that order, or obey the order under protest.
(1)
Reply
(0)
PV2 Abbott Shaull
PV2 Abbott Shaull
11 y
I would many of the people you lump into Camp #1. Don't agree with what is going on in this country and have tried to speak out, but have not been able to get anyone to hear them. It can be very frustrating when you trying to tell someone what they are doing is wrong, against the law, and unconstitutional, and they go ahead and do anyways. They are more torn up than you are me or anyone will ever know. Lot of them are along for the ride, because they are looking after their troops, and hopefully they will not have to ever make that choice. Many of use, are going along, because we have to have each other back in the long run. No one else, including our own Government will never have our back for us. So if that means swallowing pride, and doing something we not to much for, so be it. Yet, I am sure if there is ever a time when the people of the U.S. have to take back their Right of Government from those who have eroded and taken them away. As you seem to think is such a time, and other have hinted it getting close. Like I said, the Constitution as it is written, with the original 10 amendment one of the greatest treasures our Found Fathers could have left for any Nation. When we look at all the failed Countries who have copied it, to only end in Coup, after Coup, over various accounts of corruptions. That isn't by any means an indication of that wonderful Document failing in those Countries! I would say in many cases, it show the Constitution living and breathing and being acted upon, but other people, who are trying to emulate what our Founder Fathers left us. We are just too blind to the corrupt system that we have in place now, I am afraid we may never get back to point of time, where we are abiding by the Constitution, because none of the 550 so Jackasses in Washington, who supposedly running this Nation are more worried about applying modern laws, than every learning what that document reads, and reading the background information to that document. I correlate to people who can name off this Bible passage and that Bible passage for almost any situation. In reality, the passage they relate in the situation, if you look at the entire context of the message for which passage was taken from, it has nothing to do with the situation at hand, for which the person told for.

So yeah I think most of the stuff he has done is over the top and illegal in one way or another. He is still the President of the United States. If he gives an Order, I gave an oath back in 1988, and sure it been since Dec. 8th, 1989 since I was in, but if ask to wear the uniform again. I would for Country with pride, I have to respect the Commander-in-Chief not the man who will not salute our flag, or one who refuses on a regular basis to honor the Military that he has the privilege of being Commander-in-Chief of.

It is damn shame too, because it not only the Military he dishonor, it has filtered down into the V.A. since he taken office too. It was bad in 2007, but it has only gotten worse, I mean how can you keep cutting staff and facilities, when more injure combat injuries are being discharge, and more Veterans are signing up every day. Then you get what we have. The entire system is joke, it is flipping frustrating.

Yes we all have the right to disobey an order, but that usually gets you arrested. Obey the order under protest, well if it was illegal order to begin with, and criminal charges can be filed, you are still on the hook for those charge, sorry. Obey that order, this is the one thing we all been train, we all like to believe all orders we are given are legal, at times it can be deadly to question ones orders. So yeah I understand why some people blindly follow, let's face not everyone can make the rank of General. There will always be Privates, Airmen, and Sailors somewhere to take the orders at the bottom of the food chain.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
COL Senior Account Executive
0
0
0
I've served most of my career feeling like I was one or two grades lower than I could have been (turned my commission down at 22 and waited another six years) so sure lol. To know what I know now would have made me a better (insert rank here)
(0)
Comment
(0)
SGM Senior Adviser, National Communications
SGM (Join to see)
11 y
Maj Rahman, interesting and useful perspective. Thanks for sharing. You have my respect.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Danny Warren
0
0
0
Once a Soldier always a Soldier
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
Cpl Carl H
0
0
0
No, I wouldn't be an e4 with a graduate degree and have 25 year olds giving me orders. Further, I would be of little benefit to my prior mos at this age.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Estill Hall
0
0
0
Absolutely without question I would buy I would fight to stay at least an e-5
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SPC Ruben Barrios
0
0
0
Always ready!!! physically and mentally too!! it would suck for the higher ranks to lose them but I think that in the end it wouldn't matter because in an emergency everybody should be ready and able to fight for this country.. a serious problem would be that if in the close future the weapons systems change, the older soldiers would have little time to get proficient at them.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SPC Michael Christian
0
0
0
Yes
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Roy Neve
0
0
0
SGM, if I was needed again I would return but not with any rank loss since I have been down that road once before. My father who was a CSM retired in '87 informed me that in the 60s many were called back to duty with one additional stripe added to their rank. If my services were really needed once again, the Army would need to either promote me to the next grade or higher. In nearly the 30 years that I have served in the Army and many of my friends who have served in the various branches of the Armed Forces have informed me practically the same story. The services are not the same as they were while they were growing up in the armed forces and while they were serving as a soldier, marine, sailor or an airman. The discipline was not there not only for the enlisted corps but also for the officers which was a mess. The soldiers that I trained while I was an instructor at the Military Intelligence School and Center and later I was assigned to be a Platoon Sergeant at an Advance Individual Training company. A few of my students and trainees corresponded with me once they were graduated and assigned at their current units would describe that the Army has changed in the short time that they were in and they looked forward to their completion of their obligation out of the Army. As many of our fellow veterans and retirees have stated that the military would get a rude awakening if we return to duty once again because many of us will not bend like a palm tree due to the countless of changes that happened while we were out of uniform or even some of us those changes happened while we were still serving.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
Sgt Michael Furphy
0
0
0
Depends on the situation. This administration has gotten rid of how many Generals and other top ranking officials? I don't know why. If someone has a clue why, please inform me. I'm sorry but I just do not trust this current organization. If it was to go to Africa to help with Ebola, which I think is ludicrous and only puts these men in danger, my answer would be no! But if I could clearly see what the threat to our great country was, they would only have to pay me to cover my monthly bills so my wife would be taken care of. They would also have to pay for my much larger size of cammies that I would be wearing. Another problem if I was to re-enlist is that I've gotten so fat I might show up on radar. Shuhh. Just last week my doctor told me I have flesh eating disease and gave me 87 years to live. But yeah, my country can count on me!
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SPC Christopher Smith
0
0
0
If they ask me to come back, I better come in a pay grade or two higher. If I somehow roll out of bed to come crawling back, I'd take a pay reduction.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close