If we replaced all the soldier in WW2 with soldier of today. Would we have won WW2?

Unfortunately its like apples and oranges. They fought for ideals and could see the consequences of failure. They fought for the duration- for some 4+ years. with little or even no leave. The population supported them and suffered for them. These days, it seems more about - what can I get, where is my electronic hookup, when can I go on leave, whats in it for me. The population does not/probably won't suffer to support us, and tell our people that rotations maybe 2-4 years and they will freak.

My dad was a WW2 veteran, 10th Mt. Div. 87th Mt. Inf. Reg. He served 20 years from about 1940 to 1961. I knew him as a loving, hard working father, who was trying his best to be a good disciple of Christ. However, the more I learn about his service in WW2 I know that he was once a hard core warrior, very hard core. He would sneak into German fox holes and bring back one alive for interrogation. Personally, I don't think I could ever be that cool and cold. They were tough men and I have not seen that kind of toughness since I left Ft. Bragg back in 1983, when all our senior NCOs had CIBs from Vietnam.

Considering the "greatest generation" were over 60% draftees who were forced to act and the millennial armed forces are 100% volunteers with over two decades of conflict, I'm inclined to grant the sobriquet to the millennials.