Posted on Sep 17, 2018
SSG Intelligence Sergeant
96.6K
983
373
275
275
0
I know what the regulation states, and that is that E-5 through E-8 (except for 1SG) is addressed as Sergeant. However, I continually see soldiers addressing MSGs by their full rank. Is it a sign of higher respect for the rank they earned, or is just being extra? I can see both sides of the argument - regulation vs respect towards the rank they have obtained - I want to hear all your thoughts!
Avatar feed
Responses: 234
SSG Public Affairs Training Nco
0
0
0
It's just sergeant.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Anthony Petrelli
0
0
0
It has always been the way that I do business, and don't think that it really matters as long as it is done out of respect.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
GySgt Thomas Lieb
0
0
0
Traditionally, in the Marine Corps, (when I was in uniform) unless invited by individual or unit custom, we would call everyone by their actual rank from Private to Sergeant Major of the Marine Corps (and of course the entire Officer Corps, including warrant Officers....an exception is made for Combat Arms Warrant Officers, as their semi-official title is "Gunner"....and although many other Marine warrant officers like it if you call them Gunner, the only "Official" Gunners are warrant officers in the combat arms) So if I was reporting new to a unit I would perhaps speak with the 0141 NCOIC as Sergeant, and he would address me as Gunnery Sergeant. Later I might allow as how he could call me Gunny, but I would always address him as Sergeant (unless in town and off duty) I have a personal friend of 30 or 40 years whom I rarely call Bob unless I am talking to one of our wives, nearly always call him Master Guns in private, and out of habit, when referring or speaking to him in public, say the full title Master Gunnery Sergeant (even though he's been retired nearly 20 years)
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SFC John Barna
0
0
0
We drove the Navy non-coms in GITMO crazy by purposely calling each other Sergeant, for all ranks betwene e5 and e8 - (SGMs were always addressed as Sergeant-Major). The navy Master Chiefs and senior master chiefs got very upset if you just called them 'Chief', and could not understand why we didn't say Sergeant First Class or Staff Sergeant when addressing each other.
(0)
Comment
(0)
TSgt Daniel Lediard
TSgt Daniel Lediard
>1 y
Your comments are causing some smiles! By the way - wipe that smile off your face!
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CW4 Don Kite
0
0
0
I have only used "Master Sergeant" for those I am very close to and have great amount of respect for. Many times I have used a Soldier's full rank was to get their attention and re mind them that they are senior noncomissioned officers and not young "buck" Sergeants.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
PFC Robert Brooks
0
0
0
I recognized all Sgt's by there current rand SSGT SFC MSG SGMJ It is about respect and tradition. They worked hard for their rank as you do they deserve to be recognized for it. If they say different then that's how you should address them Just my thoughts
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
CPT Larry Hudson
0
0
0
Shows highest respect for service, rank earned, experience.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
COL G6
0
0
0
Edited 7 y ago
You are never wrong to address any rank by their full rank. But, Master Sergeant is one where many soldiers believe it is required when it is not. I even had a Master Sergeant himself once say it was required to call him Master Sergeant. Many people just do not know.
Saying “Master Sergeant” is not more respectful. I never understood when people say that.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
COL G6
0
0
0
Edited 7 y ago
X
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
CW5 Senior Ordnance Wo Career Manager
0
0
0
I prefer addressing them as “Master Sergeants”. In my opinion, it’s about respect.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close