Posted on Jul 23, 2016
Is there any movie that was equal to or better than the book, is it intrinsic to the media themselves?
5.19K
58
46
5
5
0
Responses: 13
An excellent question for discussion. Sure beats the usual drivel on here!!!
(4)
(0)
Capt Richard I P.
SCPO (Join to see), thanks, I do try to help keep the good professional topics going....what do you think on the topic?
(2)
(0)
SCPO (Join to see)
Capt Richard I P. - well, I picked E because it covered all potentialities. However, I've always leaned toward the book. There have been too many examples where the movie left me unfulfilled. Movies are intensely visual and auditory. Books can arouse a variety of senses, even some not found on the usual list. My prime example is Cold Mountain. A very good movie, one that was true to the book. The book, however, was the most literal "time machine" I've ever had in my hands. Reading the book transported me through time and space as No.Other.Book.Ever.Has.
(1)
(0)
I've generally foundnbooks superior, if only for the simple reason of having the opportunity to go into greater detail of both characterization, and or explanation. That being said, on rare occasions, I'd found, once in awhile, a movie can at least equal a book, or, if not precisely equal, at the very least, get reasonably close. The best example I'd ever seen for purely military history films, I think was The Great Raid, about the liberation of Cabanatuan POW camp on Luzon that the Japanese ran for the survivors of the Bataan death march. Another, that, if not perfect, was so well casted and acted as to let one ignore the very few historical inaccuracies, was, of course, Glory, Matthew Broderick along with Denzel Washington should, in my view, have gotten an Oscar for his depiction of Col Robert Gould Shaw, plus, casting him in the role was virtually genius, as well, to my way of thinking. There's also DaY One about the Manhattan Project, which, aside from leaving out the story of Louis Slotingp, as depicted in the otherwise abysmal Fat Man and Little Boy, where I'd thought Paul Newman woefully miscast, Brian Denehy in Day One did a tour de force as MGen Leslie R Groves, Paul Newman did his best, however, Brian Denehy was a spot on match in terms of physiognomy, though John Cusack playing Louis Slotin or the role of him in Fat Man was quite good, certainly. Tjere are others I could cite as well, however, hopefully, those at least I think reasonably illustrate my point, I'd be eager for any thoughts, I realize of course that tastes as to such things will obv differ, many thanks.
(4)
(0)
Capt Richard I P.
Capt Daniel Goodman Some good points on good movies , I haven't read the attending books and cannot judge relatively.
(0)
(0)
Capt Daniel Goodman
I follow, many thanks, much appreciated, of course, if I think of any other suitable examples, I'll also try to submit them as well, of course.
(1)
(0)
I always tried to read the book first before seeing the movie although this wasn't always the case. Ex. I saw the movie We Were Soldiers before reading the book. Same with Platoon. Anyway if I end up reading the book first I too often criticize the movie depending on what's left out. I stopped watching the Harry Potter series because of that reason. I've also come across some movies that do a doggone fine job of portraying their respective book (Flags of Our Fathers).
(2)
(0)
Capt Richard I P.
SGT Aaron Atwood I like to do the film version first if I can, as in comments above to SFC Richard Giles , it best allows me to enjoy both if I can.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next