My chain of command just announced that they're going to inspect on and off-post housing. What are they allow to inspect?

My First Question is does the Government own or lease these off post housing ?
if the answer is yes, then the answer to your Question is yes, your command can enter and inspect your house, with a proper notice.

if the Answer is no,
then the Command has no Authority to enter you home, without your Permission.

so I would do Few things,
first for your Dog Safety, make sure you have the proper size Dog Crate, for your Dog.
Especially if your Dog is not Currently People Friendly.

Secondly I would get The Dog Trained, I would make sure My dog Listen to my commands , for His or Her Safety .
If you cannot teach the Dog to become People Friendly, I Recommend you Hire a Dog Trainer to teach your dog to become people Friendly, this will save your Dog life.

If you do not do these things, and your Dog does not become people friendly, it only a matter of time before the Dog will hurt someone or worse a Child, then you will be court ordered by a judge to have the family dog killed or the court order kind words, (put down for public safety.)

Your House Should Always be Clean , Clutter is ok, you have a family living there, but it should be clean, if the Command is just ensuring that the person you are renting from is not a slum lord.

Your Command is not doing a housing inspection on you per say, they are making sure your landlord is not a SLUM LORD, that your Land Lord Is nit just taking your money, and Forcing you to live in Sub standard Housing, taking your hard earn cash and not making any repairs to the home, ie: not fixing the roof, or hot water heater, central AIR & Heat, and so on.

your command is not doing a Housing inspection on you , so you should have nothing to fear, unless you are the ones destroying the home, allowing your Dog to piss and shit all over the House and not clean it up, living in complete filth . then they will say something to you and your wife.

We had to do this many years ago at Fort Lewis. Mostly it was for off-post housing to check the maintenance and living conditions of younger soldiers. As has been pointed out, it was announced and the chain of command explained why this was being done and told soldiers they did have the right to refuse entrance to their housing. Most let the NCOs in. Mine didn't have an issue with it, as I already stopped by to talk to my soldiers, drop them off after work, pick them up for weekend details, etc. I have always known where my soldiers lived, on-post, off-post, and in the barracks. Call me old school, but that was part of the leader relationship I formed with my soldiers and their families.

WHAT!!! Another incompetent COMMANDER. It appears when Officers reach a certain rank, their BRAINS disappear. I believe this one has reached his "Peter Principle". The Peter Principle that members of a hierarchy are promoted until they reach the level at which they are no longer competent.

When I was in the military (a few million years ago), some base housing is off-base (or off-post). That may be the housing that they are referring to. Since they have informed you, that qualifies as the "landlord" giving you notice to inspect, which is the law in most states.

Easy answer. Nothing unless you let them. Otherwise they need a search warrant. Open and shut matter.

My last unit floated that idea numerous times. And I told them straight out without a warrant they are not going in my house.

If you own that home off post they can't come past the front door without your permission.

While I see this question is a bit old, it popped up in my notifications and after skimming a number of comments, I’d like to add another perspective that I’m disappointed to not be seeing.

First question on these things should be to ask what the intent/purpose is. It may very well have been misinterpreted or misconstrued somewhere along the chain.

Sometimes these very “inspections” are sincerely intended as leader engagement, to simply take a quick glance at the general conditions Soldiers (and Families) are living in but also to ensure leaders/units actually know WHERE a Soldier lives. Essentially a check and confirmation of the validity of alert rosters. Emergency situations aren’t the time to discover that a unit isn’t aware a Soldier moved addresses 8 months ago and no one knew or updated records. Likewise, homes don’t need to be “inspected” to set off red flags of potential concerns. A quick stop, knock on the door, introduction to a spouse, and so on can go a long way in providing a cursory glance of the conditions, confirming an individual’s address, and simply checking in to ensure the family has a touch point with the unit.

Don’t get me wrong. I’m not naive and well aware that too often these are in fact attempts by overzealous leaders to push boundaries. But not always.

Please check out your 4th Amendment rights, unless you give consent, or signed a prior consent contract you are not obligated to a search/inspection by authorities. If you have shown reasonable suspicious activity, the story would be different.

I'm curious to know if this is a new post-wide policy or just a unit policy. Generally, policy changes like this are rooted in an incident that results in a preventative policy. When I was a Company Commander I had a situation where a young private, who was livibg in the barracks, went home on leave and came back with a young bride. He coukdn't bring her to the barracks so they "crashed" at a buddy's trailor with two other soldiers living there. Not a good situation and it was brought to my attention thru his chain of command who checked-up on his living situation since he had not received permission to live off post. This was a potential disaster that was avoided but I wonder what prompted the new policy with your command?