Posted on Aug 11, 2015
TSgt Joshua Copeland
252K
4.49K
1.13K
455
454
1
Bedb0d74
67ae2902
One columnist of a major news periodical thinks so.

--
You know that racist flag? The one that supposedly honors history but actually spreads a pernicious myth? And is useful only to venal right-wing politicians who wish to exploit hatred by calling it heritage? It’s past time to pull it down.

Oh, wait. You thought I was referring to the Confederate flag. Actually, I’m talking about the POW/MIA flag.

I told the story in the first chapter of my 2014 book The Invisible Bridge: The Fall of Nixon and the Rise of Reagan: how Richard Nixon invented the cult of the “POW/MIA” in order to justify the carnage in Vietnam in a way that rendered the United States as its sole victim.

It began, as cultural historian H. Bruce Franklin has documented, with an opportunistic shift in terminology. Downed pilots whose bodies were not recovered—which, in the dense jungle of a place like Vietnam meant most pilots—had once been classified “Killed in Action/Body Unrecovered.”

During the Nixon years, the Pentagon moved them into a newly invented “Missing in Action” column. That proved convenient, for, after years of playing down the existence of American prisoners in Vietnam, in 1969, the new president suddenly decided to play them up.

He declared their treatment, and the enemy’s refusal to provide a list of their names, violations of the Geneva Conventions—the better to paint the North Vietnamese as uniquely cruel and inhumane. He also demanded the release of American prisoners as a precondition to ending the war.

This was bullshit four times over: first, because in every other conflict in human history, the release of prisoners had been something settled at the close of a war; second, because these prisoners only existed because of America’s antecedent violations of the Geneva Conventions in bombing civilians in an undeclared war; third, because, as bad as their torture of prisoners was, rather than representing some species of Oriental despotism, the Vietnam Communists were only borrowing techniques practiced on them by their French colonists (and incidentally paid forward by us in places like Abu Ghraib): see this as-told-to memoir by POW and future senator Jeremiah Denton. And finally, our South Vietnamese allies’ treatment of their prisoners, who lived manacled to the floors in crippling underground bamboo “tiger cages” in prison camps built by us, was far worse than the torture our personnel suffered.

(Time magazine quoted one South Vietnamese official who was confronted with stories of released prisoners moving “like crabs, skittering across the floor on buttocks and palms,” and responded with incredulity that such survivors even existed: “No one ever comes from the tiger cages alive.”)

Be that as it may: It worked. American citizens enacted a bizarre psychic reversal. A man from Virginia Beach, Virginia, described to a reporter the supposed treatment of American prisoners in North Vietnam: “They just dig holes in the ground and drop them in. They throw food down to them, and let them live there in their own waste.” In fact, that was how prisoners were treated in South Vietnam—as recently revealed in a shocking Life magazine exposé.

Children began wearing “POW bracelets,” drivers sported “POWs NEVER HAVE A NICE DAY” bumper stickers. As the late Jonathan Schell of The New Yorker memorably wrote during the war, the Americans were acting “as though the North Vietnamese had kidnapped 400 Americans and the United States had gone to war to retrieve them.”

Actually, it was worse: Whenever Nixon or one of his minions talked about the problem, they tended to use the number 1,400. The number of actual prisoners, was about 550. The number of downed, missing pilots were spoken of, prima facia, as if they were missing, too, although almost all of them were certainly dead.

And in 1971 that damned flag went up.

The flag was the creation of the National League of Families of Prisoners of War, later the National League of Families of American Prisoners and Missing in Southeast Asia, a fascinating part of the story in itself.

The organization was founded by POW wife Sybil Stockdale, during the Johnson administration, in an effort to embarrass LBJ and challenge his line that all in Vietnam was going swell. Johnson tried to silence them; Nixon’s people, however, spying opportunity, coopted the group, sometimes inventing chapters outright, to fan the propaganda flames.

Then the war ended, the POWs (yes, all the POWs) were repatriated to great fanfare, one of them declaring: “I want you to remember that we walked out of Hanoi as winners”—a declaration that seemed to suggest, almost, that by surviving, the POWs had won the Vietnam War.

The moral confusion was abetted by the flag: the barbed-wire misery of that stark white figure, emblazoned in black.

It memorializes Americans as the preeminent victims of the Vietnam War, a notion seared into the nation’s visual unconscious by the Oscar-nominated 1978 film The Deer Hunter, which depicts acts of sadism, which were documented to have been carried out by our South Vietnamese allies, as acts committed by our North Vietnamese enemies, including the famous scene pictured on The Deer Hunter poster: a pistol pointed at the American prisoner’s head at exactly the same angle of the gun in the famous photograph of the summary execution in the middle of the street of an alleged Communist spy by a South Vietnamese official.

By then, the league and its flag had become the Pentagon’s own Frankenstein’s monster. You can read about the mess that resulted in the definitive book on the subject: Until the Last Man Comes Home: POWs, MIAs, and the Unending Vietnam War by Northwestern University’s Michael J. Allen.

Allen describes how Vietnam’s “refusal” to “account for” a thousand phantoms became an impediment to reconciliation and diplomatic recognition between the two nations. (How bizarre, how insulting, how counterproductive this must have been to a nation that must have suffered missing corpses in the thousands upon thousands?)

A delegation led by Congressman Gillespie “Sonny” Montgomery (D-Miss.), chairman of the House Select Committee on Missing in Action in Southeast Asia, traveled to Vietnam in 1975, convinced of the Nixon administration’s deception that hundreds of “MIAs actually” existed.

The members of Congress returned home, having found their Communist hosts warm and accommodating, doubting there were any missing at all. In hearings, a CIA pilot captured there in 1965 testified: “If you take a wallet-full of money over there, you can buy all the information you want on POWs on the streets.”

The House committee also produced evidence that China had manufactured stories of MIA in Vietnamese prison camps in order to keep the U.S. from normalizing relations with China’s Asian rival. No matter that the flag’s promoters were abetting an actual, real-live Communist conspiracy, from its original sightings above VFW and American Legion posts, the “You Are Not Forgotten” flag became as common as kudzu.

Midwifing an entire metastasizing Pentagon bureaucracy, the League of Families would also become an irritant to every future president. By 1993, 17 Americans were stationed in Hanoi in charge of searching for the missing and working to repatriate remains. They were provided a budget of $100 million a year, “over 30 times the value of U.S. humanitarian aid paid to Vietnam,” Allen writes.

It would have been evidence of Ronald Reagan’s old saw that the closest thing to eternal life is a government program—if Reagan were not a prime culprit: In 1988, he became the first president to fly the flag over the White House. The next year, Congress installed the flag in the Capitol rotunda.

In 1990, it was designated “a symbol of our nation’s concern and commitment to restoring and resolving as fully as possible the fates of Americans still prisoner, missing and unaccounted for in Southeast Asia.” Thus ending the uncertainty for their families and the nation.

The League of Families also still exists, and “continues to work at keeping the pressure on both Washington and Hanoi to bring complete resolution to this issue on behalf of each family with a loved one still missing in Vietnam.” My own state of Illinois holds a ceremony every year to honor the “66 Illinoisans listed as MIA or POW in Southeast Asia.”

And Bernie Sanders posted an image of the POW/MIA flag on Facebook in response to Donald Trump’s insult against John McCain. The message read: “They are all heroes.”

Actually, as I document in The Invisible Bridge, it’s more complicated than that: many of the prisoners were anti-war activists. One member of the “Peace Committee” within the POW camps, Abel Larry Kavanaugh, was harassed into suicide after his return to the U.S. by the likes of Admiral James Stockdale, who tried to get Peace Committee members hanged for treason.

Stockdale would become one of the nation’s most celebrated former POWs and a vice-presidential candidate. Kavanaugh took his life in his father in law’s basement in Commerce City, Colorado, in June 1973. Americans would agree that one of them—Stockdale or Kavanaugh—is not a hero—though they would disagree about which one is which.
That damned flag: It’s a shroud. It smothers the complexity, the reality, of what really happened in Vietnam.

We’ve come to our senses about that other banner of lies. It’s time to do the same with this.

https://archive.is/sVUot#selection-2277.0-2517.93
Posted in these groups: Racism logo RacismPow logo POW/MIA6262122778 997339a086 z Politics
Avatar feed
Responses: 801
CPL Neubauer Ted
1
1
0
Unfortunately, these days anyone can make something racist if they choose and sheep will follow. Many things in our history are controversial or just plain bad. What we have to do is learn from the bad things - not erase them. The POW-MIA flag means so much to so many of us that (I hope) it will never be erased or modified. I for one will continue to fly mine with pride - just like old glory.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
LTJG Sandra Smith
1
1
0
You may disagree with the MIA classification, but it can't be "racist", since it doesn't include or exclude any "race"! It has to do with an individual in a combat zone, and his "readiness" status; he was "in action", and has gone missing. No one knows if he's lost behind enemy lines, a prisoner of the enemy, or a casualty. MIA is hard for the families, who are left in a kind of limbo, but occasionally such personnel as are so designated turn up weeks, months, or even years later, and if they've been declared dead, it creates a whole mess of other problems, so awaiting definitive proof of life or death, before declaring is wiser, if not kinder, but not "racist". Indeed, abuse of that term has become so commonplace, no one but racists pay it any attention any longer, so that genuine issues of racism don't get timely resolution.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Scott Adie
1
1
0
Edited 4 y ago
Shameful exploitation of the race card. Even if I bought the whole article, which I don't, there is no racist element to it unless we're ignorant enough to believe that simply because the Vietnamese, North and South, are center stage in the POW flag's history, that makes it racist. I am appalled by the author's totally unfounded assertion that the POW flag is racist. And the ? mark in the article title does not dismiss his foolish attempt to ambush his readers.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SPC Tim LaFountain
1
1
0
If you weren’t there or you never served your opinion is just that, an opinion.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
1SG Armor Senior Sergeant
1
1
0
Bullshit. Straight up BULLSHIT
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
CW4 Byron Edgington
1
1
0
I tend to agree with this assessment, though I think the better takeaway is that we need to be awfully damn careful with our national images and icons. 'Running things up the flagpole to see who salutes' is an old, tired mantra, but there are folks who salute without thinking, and that's where we get in trouble. Beyond that, as a veteran of that miserable war, I have a bit of authority in discussing it, and in my humble opinion nobody 'won' in Vietnam. Both sides endured grievous losses, and a generation of young men, on both sides, gave their lives for a cause that was dubious at best.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Lance LeBerte
1
1
0
this is the most ridiculous article I have ever read, not once was race mentioned except in the title
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Phillip Hoffeld
1
1
0
Can't you find anything significant to report on rather than trying to make a statement or coin a catch-phrase? I believe a LOT of reporters and cancel-culture loons just want to be able to say, "LOOK! Look what I did!!"
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SrA Gina Hotard
1
1
0
Wow...let's find a racist thing in honoring Pow/Mia NOT
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
LTC David Howard
1
1
0
The lies contained in this POS essay are too numerous to try to refute in a forum like this. But it is obvious that the writer of this column is just a military hating Leftist. "Racist" is now a term that is used as a catch-all for people the accuser does not like. It has lost its sting, and truly diminishes the word if we wish to apply it to someone deserving of that condemnation. There is nothing remotely racist about the POW/MIA flag, and while I do not believe that there are still Americans being held in North Vietnam I do not doubt that not all of our prisoners were returned in 1973 and that some were held and subsequently died in captivity. Maybe someday we will learn the truth.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close