Posted on Jul 31, 2015
"Professor awarded $2.52 million to study army physical fitness"
31.8K
81
50
9
9
0
From: K State Collegian
Katie Heinrich, assistant professor of kinesiology, has been awarded a grant for approximately $2.52 million to study how the U.S. military conducts physical fitness.
Heinrich said there have always been concerns about how well the army physical fitness program prepared soldiers for combat. One concern, obesity, has also been increasing in the military – just as it has in the general population.
“What we’re proposing is a new type of physical program that honestly is already being done on a lot of our installations,” Heinrich said. “But we’re proposing a clinical trial to randomize people to either the usual physical training program that they do, or this high intensity functional training program to see which one works better at addressing body fat percentage.”
Heinrich is the principal K-State investigator to receive the grant along with Walker Poston of the National Research and Development Institutes in Leawood, Kansas.
“In the last two years, the (Department of Defense) has come out with a new perspective of fitness,” Poston said. “They think that fitness is much broader than the way they’ve been testing it.”
The current army physical fitness test includes two minutes in which soldiers do as many pushups as they can, two minutes in which they do as many sit-ups as they can and run two miles as fast as they can. This is done with 10-20 minute breaks in between each, according to the army physical fitness test manual.
Poston said the military has been working on ways of implementing balance, agility and other types of fitness into their tests. The study Heinrich and Poston is doing involves High Intensity Interval Training, which has some of the same exercises as CrossFit, as well as 400-meter sprints. Poston said the study itself won’t be using CrossFit necessarily, even though CrossFit provides a good model.
“It just so happens that CrossFit is a good template,” Poston said. “It implements a lot of that.”
John Buckwalter, dean of the College of Human Ecology, said the grant Heinrich received is a big deal.
“It’s sort of like the premier grant to get,” Buckwalter said.
Heinrich said the idea for the study came from her experiences in Hawaii, where she started doing CrossFit.
“When I started CrossFit in Hawaii, I met tons of people from all branches of the military,” Heinrich said. “In fact, the owner of CrossFit Oahu was a Navy SEAL. So, here I was working out next to Navy SEALs, and in time got to realize that they’re just regular people.”
Heinrich said soldiers often went to the gym for training similar to military physical fitness, because what their units were putting them through was not challenging enough to improve their fitness test scores. Some would do the gym training in addition to their unit’s training, while some would just do the gym training.
Heinrich said there were stories of people who took each approach and did amazingly well on their fitness tests, even though they weren’t necessarily doing the same type of training as their peers. That was one thing that gave Heinrich the idea for the study, she said.
“That was part of it,” Heinrich said. “The other part is you also have to look at what opportunities are being offered by the government for grants.”
Heinrich said there was a grant which involved addressing the health of military populations. Researchers had the option to look at diabetes, body fat or other measures of health.
Heinrich said she had also done some previous work looking at a study where the DOD examined body composition, and found their rates of overweight and obese soldiers were higher than ideal. She had also done work with a civilian at Fort Riley, who had done another version of the high intensity physical training Heinrich and her team will be using in their research. She said the civilian had seen fitness scores improve in his program.
http://www.kstatecollegian.com/2014/09/10/professor-awarded-2-52-million-to-study-army-physical-fitness/
Katie Heinrich, assistant professor of kinesiology, has been awarded a grant for approximately $2.52 million to study how the U.S. military conducts physical fitness.
Heinrich said there have always been concerns about how well the army physical fitness program prepared soldiers for combat. One concern, obesity, has also been increasing in the military – just as it has in the general population.
“What we’re proposing is a new type of physical program that honestly is already being done on a lot of our installations,” Heinrich said. “But we’re proposing a clinical trial to randomize people to either the usual physical training program that they do, or this high intensity functional training program to see which one works better at addressing body fat percentage.”
Heinrich is the principal K-State investigator to receive the grant along with Walker Poston of the National Research and Development Institutes in Leawood, Kansas.
“In the last two years, the (Department of Defense) has come out with a new perspective of fitness,” Poston said. “They think that fitness is much broader than the way they’ve been testing it.”
The current army physical fitness test includes two minutes in which soldiers do as many pushups as they can, two minutes in which they do as many sit-ups as they can and run two miles as fast as they can. This is done with 10-20 minute breaks in between each, according to the army physical fitness test manual.
Poston said the military has been working on ways of implementing balance, agility and other types of fitness into their tests. The study Heinrich and Poston is doing involves High Intensity Interval Training, which has some of the same exercises as CrossFit, as well as 400-meter sprints. Poston said the study itself won’t be using CrossFit necessarily, even though CrossFit provides a good model.
“It just so happens that CrossFit is a good template,” Poston said. “It implements a lot of that.”
John Buckwalter, dean of the College of Human Ecology, said the grant Heinrich received is a big deal.
“It’s sort of like the premier grant to get,” Buckwalter said.
Heinrich said the idea for the study came from her experiences in Hawaii, where she started doing CrossFit.
“When I started CrossFit in Hawaii, I met tons of people from all branches of the military,” Heinrich said. “In fact, the owner of CrossFit Oahu was a Navy SEAL. So, here I was working out next to Navy SEALs, and in time got to realize that they’re just regular people.”
Heinrich said soldiers often went to the gym for training similar to military physical fitness, because what their units were putting them through was not challenging enough to improve their fitness test scores. Some would do the gym training in addition to their unit’s training, while some would just do the gym training.
Heinrich said there were stories of people who took each approach and did amazingly well on their fitness tests, even though they weren’t necessarily doing the same type of training as their peers. That was one thing that gave Heinrich the idea for the study, she said.
“That was part of it,” Heinrich said. “The other part is you also have to look at what opportunities are being offered by the government for grants.”
Heinrich said there was a grant which involved addressing the health of military populations. Researchers had the option to look at diabetes, body fat or other measures of health.
Heinrich said she had also done some previous work looking at a study where the DOD examined body composition, and found their rates of overweight and obese soldiers were higher than ideal. She had also done work with a civilian at Fort Riley, who had done another version of the high intensity physical training Heinrich and her team will be using in their research. She said the civilian had seen fitness scores improve in his program.
http://www.kstatecollegian.com/2014/09/10/professor-awarded-2-52-million-to-study-army-physical-fitness/
Fitness
Army
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 22
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
0
Ummm, am I missing something? Hasn't Army Physical Fitness program been studied already? They created two new regulations (one no longer valid)...
(1)
(0)
SPC(P) Jay Heenan
Oh, my favorite part of this...she is getting 2.5 million for studying crossfit, a program that already exists?
(1)
(0)
1
1
0
Seems to me that they could study PT program for a lot less than 2.5 million bucks.
(1)
(0)
1
1
0
I can't help but think that the government is overthinking this one, especially with regard to obesity. A couple of quotes that could apply that give a pretty good answer to this so-called "difficult" question are as follows:
"Weight is lost in the kitchen, not in the gym."
"You can't outrun a bad diet."
Functional exercises make people better at performing that particular function. As they burn more calories, a phenomenon known as "hunger" occurs as the body tries to offset that caloric burn with increased intake.
The important key here is ensuring Soldiers have ready access to solid nutrition information and are provided the opportunity to make healthier choices in what foods they intake. If they choose not to exercise the healthy route and instead spend their weekends knee-deep in pizza and beer, and they fail the ABCP standards, they have only themselves to blame. Not PRT, crossfit, or any other training program.
Beyond that, if there are mental barriers in the way of making proper diet choices, such as (frequently misdiagnosed) eating disorders, those Soldiers need access to medical care. The Army will also probably need them separated from service, especially during a time of dramatic drawdowns.
"Weight is lost in the kitchen, not in the gym."
"You can't outrun a bad diet."
Functional exercises make people better at performing that particular function. As they burn more calories, a phenomenon known as "hunger" occurs as the body tries to offset that caloric burn with increased intake.
The important key here is ensuring Soldiers have ready access to solid nutrition information and are provided the opportunity to make healthier choices in what foods they intake. If they choose not to exercise the healthy route and instead spend their weekends knee-deep in pizza and beer, and they fail the ABCP standards, they have only themselves to blame. Not PRT, crossfit, or any other training program.
Beyond that, if there are mental barriers in the way of making proper diet choices, such as (frequently misdiagnosed) eating disorders, those Soldiers need access to medical care. The Army will also probably need them separated from service, especially during a time of dramatic drawdowns.
(1)
(0)
1
1
0
The road to hell is paved with good intentions. The simple fact will always remain that you can do push-ups, sit-ups, and the 2 mile run almost anywhere for an APFT. The problem lies within the training program itself. PT programs themselves are a quandary in a deployment situation. There are far more important things to worry about in a forward area than PT like I don't know, winning the war. It is pretty irritating when you're trying to rollout for a mission and there is a formation running down the main road blocking traffic.
(1)
(0)
1
1
0
I hope she won't end up putting shrimp on a treadmill for underwater tests and she'll find out that we need to do is pool workouts.
(1)
(0)
1
1
0
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google