10
10
0
Do you think the future chain of commands will use RallyPoint to check you out prior to assignment?
Posted 12 y ago
Responses: 25
SPC Dan Goforth
What is posted in a public forum/social site is public information. If someone chooses to make such information public, it's their own fault for posting it if it is used against them.
(3)
(0)
CPT (Join to see)
Yes, if you post it publicly, it's out there and you cannot claim it was private. Employers still cannot discriminate in a way that violates federal EO laws (like not hiring someone after finding out that they are pregnant), but those cases would be hard to prove since there is no obligation for the company to announce that they are looking at your social media. <div><br></div><div>Personal story: My FB profile is mostly private, but my profile picture and cover photo are public. I searched for a civilian job for months. My profile photo used to be a picture of me and my kids at Hershey Park (read: single mom) and my cover photo was my platoon in Iraq holding the American Flag (read: conservative, pro-Iraq, divided allegiance Guard vs. work). I changed my profile picture to just me by myself and my cover photo to an image from Thailand and within 2 weeks I had three calls for interviews. Yes, employers look at FB.</div>
(3)
(0)
SSG (Join to see)
SPC P K, although there ARE rules and regulations that keep people protected while seeking employment, the Human factor will always be prevalent. There can be rules etc. but that wont stop people from applying their own prejudices, its human nature. If it is out there on a public domain, its free game. People are well aware of this and if not, they should be. Just as CPT Wolfer stated above.<br>
(1)
(0)
When I assisted a BDE CDR, I was often asked to research the incoming officer slate. Not LTs, but MAJs and LTCs were definitely looked at closely. CPTs looking for company command as well. He wasn't interested in political viewpoints, but certainly anything that looked like a lapse in judgement would get printed and stuck in the file. I was amazed at what officers posted. One of my favorites was a female MAJ who had close-ups of her oiled bare tummy in a bikini on FB and had "Friended" most of her own section. Never actually met her...<div><br></div><div>I digress...yes, it will be used once people know about it. If I am being perfectly honest, I do feel concerned about discrimination based on political view points. There are people who have consistently posted responses to scenarios that I feel would not concur with how I would want things handled in my company. That said, CPTs don't really get much say (if any) over what LTs they get. </div><div><br></div><div>On the other hand, I am known for being a divergent thinker, a "Red Teamer", someone who feels tradition gets a vote, but not a veto. I would rather have a leadership team know that about me going in, and pass on me, than for me to be stuck in a unit where I was not a good fit. I think some of the toxic leadership stories are really square-peg-round-hole situations where one or two Soldiers found themselves being the odd man out and were targeted for it. I wish CDRs at every level had more control over the senior NCOs and Officers that enter their unit. </div>
(5)
(0)
LTC (Join to see)
I think people should be respected and having a point view should not hurt you. But that knife swings the other way, I don't want to work for people who can't respect the views of others.
(0)
(0)
<p>Sure, why not? </p><p><br></p><p>Command Sergeants-Major all seem to know eachother, and do talk amongst themselves about outgoing or incoming Soldiers.</p><p><br></p><p>It can work the other way around too. If you know where you are being assigned to next, why wouldn't you search on here for people in the unit or post? Seeing who the people you will be living and working with, and how they think and express themselves will give one a little more familiarity than in the past just going in somewhere cold.</p><p><br></p><p>Technology gives us all the same advantages.</p>
(5)
(0)
I totally hope so. It is a great tool to evaluate mid-career and beyond by seeing how they communicate in writing, what they believe in, how they conduct themselves, and how they design their own bio.<br><br>Also: I hope they automatically discount anyone with an influence score of 75,000+ as having too much time on their hands and requiring more additional duties. Tongue in cheek-ness intended.
(4)
(0)
There are multiple ways to find out about an incoming Soldier, I do research on my inbounds but I always allow the incoming Soldier to walk in the door with a clean slate regardless of what I may come across, good or bad.
(4)
(0)
I think it's used now but I don't think it makes any difference. When I transferred from active duty to the reserves last month, I took a peek at the gaining unit and the personnel there. Most accounts were barely filled out and provided me nothing about the personnel there. It's hit or miss.
(3)
(0)
SFC Day, <div><br></div><div>If I were a senior NCO, then I could see my future chains of command looking me up on RP. As a lower enlisted, I think my opinions on pizza MREs and favorite movie quotes are safe from the prying eyes of my future company commanders and brigade commanders.</div>
(3)
(0)
SGT (Join to see)
Right you are, SSG Cedeno, you and I are "junior enlisted Soldiers." Thanks for catching that. I'd rather be corrected online than on the spot!
(0)
(0)
1SG (Join to see)
I have been corrected for the same issue, we all learned from mistakes and improve.
(2)
(0)
1SG (Join to see)
I have been corrected for the same issue, we all learned from mistakes and improve.
(1)
(0)
SFC Day, As rally point (like facebook) grows in fame it will become another tool to see how Units can learn about the gaining Soldier other than what is on their ERB. The internet is not Private and I have learned if I don't want embarrassing things to resurface don't put myself in those situations. Cyberspace is a new wave of Information Gathering and we don't have to go far for an AR reference or intel (google is every Soldier's friend). So yes I do believe it will be a tool in years to come
(2)
(0)
I have my fair share of "digital enemies" on here, and if my C.o.C was to see some of my debates I'm sure I would be looked at as a problem child before I even entered the door. I regret nothing, I will always defend my views if I believe they are true and I can prove that they are of merit. That said, if a C.o.C can remain professional and see potential in my ability to give my honest opinion no matter the rank or question, I could also be seen as a benefit to an organization.
(2)
(0)
MAJ (Join to see)
I just like to listen a lot, and give back what speaks to me. If I could retain half the wisdom imparted by those wiser than I, *then* I would be a wise man!
(2)
(0)
SPC Christopher Smith
To gain and retain is intellect. To live, learn, and teach is wisdom. Something I heard from a teacher some time ago. Don't down play "YOUR" wisdom, what you have learned and lived, it is partially a duty to teach it, or it is all for not, and you leave no mark on the world.
(2)
(0)
MAJ (Join to see)
Touche, SPC Smith! Well stated, and I stand (sit) corrected! It's not just the taking in of knowledge and regurgitation out, it's the ability to apply it in a/any situation. Also, since you mention about teaching, most often (I would say "always," but absolutes are too easy to disprove) something is not learned until it must be taught. I've found this to be true in my experience as well. Well said!
(2)
(0)
SPC Christopher Smith
I was lucky to be born with the ability to be quite, and listen very well. This afforded me the opportunity to learn from older people, who wanted to teach, not out of a book, but personal experience. That being said, I must say I agree with you, sir.
(1)
(0)
Read This Next

RallyPoint
New Assignment
