Posted on Dec 28, 2015
1LT Armor Officer
61.5K
231
134
7
7
0
*Edit. I've adjusted the question so that it is clearer.

I think that Commanders in a garrison environment should have not UCMJ authority especially since UCMJ and Criminal Law in America do not operate under the same standards.

Just to clarify, I am facing a courts martial for alleged sexually assault. I am asking whether Commanders should have UCMJ authority in a garrison environment as opposed to a deployed environment where courts are not readily available.

Additionally, if you view my group at http://www.facebook.com/withutheapp/ you'll cleally see that I am trying to solve the problem. I've been working on the project for a year. So I'm not trying to skirt the judicial process. I'm really just trying to ensure that justice is served.
Posted in these groups: Ucmj UCMJ111011 f jf989 002 Article 15
Edited 10 y ago
Avatar feed
See Results
Responses: 43
Cpl Benjamin Long
0
0
0
Any US court always has the power override a commander... Judicial orders and civilian judges ultimately answer to the US supreme court... The court has the power to strike down any art 15 via appeal process.. Just like a federal judge making a ruling an NJP can be overturned by an appeals cpurt.. Since they have the power to strike down laws and lower court rulings.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
LTC Ray Buenteo
0
0
0
I screwed up. I voted no by accident. Yes CDRs should have UCMJ authority. You are an officer in the military and you put yourself in a position to be accused of sexual assault? Lol. Back your bags.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
LTC Ray Buenteo
0
0
0
Yes Commanders should have UCMJ authority
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close