1
1
0
1st let's talk about his citizenship status:
> https://provscons.com/why-does-elon-musk-have-3-citizenships/
> https://zeenews.india.com/international-business/elon-musk-has-citizenship-of-3-countries-here-are-10-interesting-things-about-planets-richest-man-2335250.html
> https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/3269201-with-elon-musk-as-an-example-should-we-change-eligibility-for-president/
2nd let's talk about his efforts:
What he is doing to help victims of Hurricane Ian is amazing!
> https://www.marketwatch.com/story/elon-musks-starlink-will-reposition-satellites-to-provide-florida-with-internet-access-as-residents-recover-from-hurricane-ian [login to see] 3
Philanthropy in focus:
> https://www.philanthropyroundtable.org/elon-musks-philanthropy-and-donor-privacy/
> https://www.forbes.com/sites/elizahaverstock/2022/02/15/elon-musk-reports-donating-57-billion-to-charity-but-there-is-no-trace-of-that-gift-yet/?sh=4861bbc12782
3rd Why not have a Billionaire very different than Trump who does not need the paycheck and would take a token $1.00. What might he bring to the table?
Would you vote for Elon?
> https://provscons.com/why-does-elon-musk-have-3-citizenships/
> https://zeenews.india.com/international-business/elon-musk-has-citizenship-of-3-countries-here-are-10-interesting-things-about-planets-richest-man-2335250.html
> https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/3269201-with-elon-musk-as-an-example-should-we-change-eligibility-for-president/
2nd let's talk about his efforts:
What he is doing to help victims of Hurricane Ian is amazing!
> https://www.marketwatch.com/story/elon-musks-starlink-will-reposition-satellites-to-provide-florida-with-internet-access-as-residents-recover-from-hurricane-ian [login to see] 3
Philanthropy in focus:
> https://www.philanthropyroundtable.org/elon-musks-philanthropy-and-donor-privacy/
> https://www.forbes.com/sites/elizahaverstock/2022/02/15/elon-musk-reports-donating-57-billion-to-charity-but-there-is-no-trace-of-that-gift-yet/?sh=4861bbc12782
3rd Why not have a Billionaire very different than Trump who does not need the paycheck and would take a token $1.00. What might he bring to the table?
Would you vote for Elon?
Faith
Citizenship
Voting
Government
Philanthropy
Posted 3 y ago
Responses: 2
1
1
0
Not enough answers. We can't vote for him because he will never be able to run. Your first point pretty much makes this moot. Elon will never be able to run for President. He wasn't born here, his parent were not Americans, and having 3 citizenships doesn't help his case. I do not want this requirement changed in our Constitution as it opens up the office to more issues.
(1)
(0)
CPO Nate S.
Sir, right!
The exercise was to see if people understood the important reasons the framers of the Constitution articulated this! I will say Musk can be leveraged in other ways that can help the nation, he does not need to be POTUS to accomplish that!
To -ltc-eugene-chu's point! Many people that run for any political office from Town Council up don't have political experience when they start out. The problem in this case of a "newbie" is a lack of COMMON SENSE in favor of POLITICAL EXPEDENENCY and SELF over others. The whole idea behind holding office "idealistically - of course" is service!!! Speaking of unpopular:
> Defunding the police!
> Senators communicating threats toward judges
> Women and children threatened with rape, murder, etc. from violent criminals that should never be on the street to victimize others (i.e., soft on crime)
> Drugs like fentanyl being disguised now as candy and kills 100s of young children
> An anemic economy that is not supportive of all levels of society
> A general lack by many current politicians of just what the three branches of government really are and respecting them as was once done
> and so much more.....................
SSG (Join to see) I have your six! -ltc-eugene-chu, sir, WADR, seriously!?!?!?!?
Frankly, if the Twitter folks were not going to be honest, then why buy something that is overinflated as to its self-indulgent importance. As to Russia, he is a novice! There are many mistakes that were we (i.e., our government) made with Russia in the last 20-years, not the least of which is Putin's psychotic and despotic behavior that we should have checked and did not when he first annexed Crimea!!! I agree with you, Musk commentary is naive and reminiscent Chamberlain in the run-up to WWII. Being smart and being wise is a rare combination.
So, -ltc-eugene-chu, let me ask you this, if Musk is not qualified for POTUS, which I am Ok with, what makes someone like Eric Swalwell, who sleeps with spies able to keep his seat in Congress and membership of a very sensitive committee, for what is a level of "passive" TREASON that seems to many that is being passed over (i.e., ignored).
> https://www.axios.com/2020/12/08/china-spy-california-politicians
> https://www.forbes.com/sites/nicholasreimann/2020/12/19/heres-what-we-know-about-rep-swalwells-connection-to-a-suspected-chinese-spy/?sh=5e [login to see]
I am equally sure none of us knows the full story! But, from a Homeland Security perspective, being "hacked" by a Chinese spy should at least match the raid on Trump's Mar-a-logo estate if we are in fact so worried about such things. Not that I am a fan, but rather because of "equal justice" or at least the perception of equal justice for those of us with independent thought I would agree with Minority Leader that when a sitting Congressman has been compromised to the extent Axios and others have independently reported the procedure by the Speaker regardless of party should be the removal from such committees as "Intel" until absolutely cleared. Put him on, say, the Interior Committee or Urban Development.
To many I have spoken with across the board, the Speaker should have had the courage to make this call but did not!
Americans are tired, and I have spoken with DEMS, REPS, and fellow Independents / Libertarians that fair is fair and what is good for the goose is good for the gander! It is double and even triple standards that are PPO. This is true when speak with blacks, women, Hispanics, Asians, and others who just want the nuttiness to stop. People who are reasonable see across the board what is wrong and why.
Just saying.......................
The exercise was to see if people understood the important reasons the framers of the Constitution articulated this! I will say Musk can be leveraged in other ways that can help the nation, he does not need to be POTUS to accomplish that!
To -ltc-eugene-chu's point! Many people that run for any political office from Town Council up don't have political experience when they start out. The problem in this case of a "newbie" is a lack of COMMON SENSE in favor of POLITICAL EXPEDENENCY and SELF over others. The whole idea behind holding office "idealistically - of course" is service!!! Speaking of unpopular:
> Defunding the police!
> Senators communicating threats toward judges
> Women and children threatened with rape, murder, etc. from violent criminals that should never be on the street to victimize others (i.e., soft on crime)
> Drugs like fentanyl being disguised now as candy and kills 100s of young children
> An anemic economy that is not supportive of all levels of society
> A general lack by many current politicians of just what the three branches of government really are and respecting them as was once done
> and so much more.....................
SSG (Join to see) I have your six! -ltc-eugene-chu, sir, WADR, seriously!?!?!?!?
Frankly, if the Twitter folks were not going to be honest, then why buy something that is overinflated as to its self-indulgent importance. As to Russia, he is a novice! There are many mistakes that were we (i.e., our government) made with Russia in the last 20-years, not the least of which is Putin's psychotic and despotic behavior that we should have checked and did not when he first annexed Crimea!!! I agree with you, Musk commentary is naive and reminiscent Chamberlain in the run-up to WWII. Being smart and being wise is a rare combination.
So, -ltc-eugene-chu, let me ask you this, if Musk is not qualified for POTUS, which I am Ok with, what makes someone like Eric Swalwell, who sleeps with spies able to keep his seat in Congress and membership of a very sensitive committee, for what is a level of "passive" TREASON that seems to many that is being passed over (i.e., ignored).
> https://www.axios.com/2020/12/08/china-spy-california-politicians
> https://www.forbes.com/sites/nicholasreimann/2020/12/19/heres-what-we-know-about-rep-swalwells-connection-to-a-suspected-chinese-spy/?sh=5e [login to see]
I am equally sure none of us knows the full story! But, from a Homeland Security perspective, being "hacked" by a Chinese spy should at least match the raid on Trump's Mar-a-logo estate if we are in fact so worried about such things. Not that I am a fan, but rather because of "equal justice" or at least the perception of equal justice for those of us with independent thought I would agree with Minority Leader that when a sitting Congressman has been compromised to the extent Axios and others have independently reported the procedure by the Speaker regardless of party should be the removal from such committees as "Intel" until absolutely cleared. Put him on, say, the Interior Committee or Urban Development.
To many I have spoken with across the board, the Speaker should have had the courage to make this call but did not!
Americans are tired, and I have spoken with DEMS, REPS, and fellow Independents / Libertarians that fair is fair and what is good for the goose is good for the gander! It is double and even triple standards that are PPO. This is true when speak with blacks, women, Hispanics, Asians, and others who just want the nuttiness to stop. People who are reasonable see across the board what is wrong and why.
Just saying.......................
Exclusive: How a suspected Chinese spy gained access to California politics
Christine Fang built connections with up-and-coming California politicians including Eric Swalwell and Ro Khanna.
(0)
(0)
0
0
0
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google