Should the 2d Amendment be amended to remove the confusing first phrase?

once you start changing the wording of the Constitution, you will give every Liberal an opportunity to change the whole of our country to suit their own needs and trample on the rights of the rest of us. Leave it alone!!!!!

Do everything to keep your weapons because with these open border, progressive (Socialist) types trying to regain the government, if they do there will be hell to pay !

It is clear. The language has changed since the Constitution was written. “Well regulated” meant “properly equipped or well equipped or well ordered”.
A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
That translates in modern English to:
A well equipped militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
A militia to the framers, is not the National Guard. The National Guard is a sworn, standing Army, not private citizens.
Since them various Supreme Courts had ignored the Second Amendment as written because it is difficult for those in power to allow the People to be empowered and not totally at the mercy of its rulers.

If they are dead set on outlawing something, outlaw lobbyists. They used to serve a purpose and cause legislation in the public interest. Not so much anymore. Just a system of legalized influence-peddling to push through legislation that is detrimental to all in society other than the ones putting up the cash. Outlaw homesteading in Congress. They push servicemen out when they're deemed as no longer effective, so why a double standard? Most MOC's have sold their souls years ago but the cash keeps them in office. Outlaw dark money that is protected by Citizens United. They can bundle through Super PACs and due to the wording we as the public have no right to know who is putting up the cash. For all we know, foreign interests are channeling cash to campaigns to circumvent our system. I'd like to know and every citizen should want to know if foreign interests are controlling our system from afar. We already know that elected positions are indirectly for sale to the highest bidders, but we assume only from US citizens. It defeats the purpose of spending $ 600 billion annually on defense when foreign actors can achieve their goals without ever firing a shot.

One problem you may be having is multiple commas. There was only one in the official, ratified version.

"A well-regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed."

I see it quoted most often with 3 commas when 2A-opponents seek either to redefine its meaning or make it extraneous. When comma-spliced into ambiguity, the resultant sentence is meaningless.

No way. This is how the founders wrote it. Leave it alone. All that does is open up a can of worms.

Have Congress vote on an amendment to the Constitution:
1) The Second Amendment is hereby rescinded.
2) The Right of the People to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.
-----------
If 2/3's of the House and Senate approve, send it out to the states. If 3/4's approve, you have clarity on gun ownership rights. If there is a failure to get 3/4's you ALSO then have clarity on gun ownership rights.

The "confusion" is from individuals & groups that want to control other individuals and groups. The 2nd Amendment is clear and concise, important to note that of all the Bill of Rights, it is the only one that SPECIFICALLY states "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED"
Our forefathers knew exactly what they were doing and saw and used few words to prevent future tyrannical governments from removing Liberty from its citizenry.

We are the militia. The idiots just need to understand that.

Not even touched!