Posted on Mar 23, 2016
Should veterans and retirees be "Triple Dipping?"
516K
14.5K
1.33K
550
550
0
We hear about how all these Vets are triple dipping, but I don't think people are educated on how hard it actually is to do this, and how very small of a percentage of people can qualify to do this.
You have to meet all of these requirements: Serve over 20 years, receive a 50% or more VA Rating, be deemed unemployable or 100% disabled by the VA, AND qualify for SSI benefits.
You have to meet all of these requirements: Serve over 20 years, receive a 50% or more VA Rating, be deemed unemployable or 100% disabled by the VA, AND qualify for SSI benefits.
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 612
Not sure someone has already pointed this out, but SSDI is what unemployable/disabled qualifies you for, not SSI.
(0)
(0)
Free money from military service is money I don’t want. I have my rating and I hurt for it. I can’t throw a baseball with my boys. Take the money back and make my shoulder work again. I have never met anyone getting social security disability that could function normally. I enjoy what I have and I don’t worry about who gets more.
(0)
(0)
As a vet and an accredited Veterans Service Officer, I know this can happen, albeit in very few circumstances. The fact is, we are not talking about 30-year O-6's that are living the high life. In my experience, I encountered several vets who use PTSD, for example, as a way to boost benefits. They are rated 30%, but claim they are "really, really having problems", but just talking with them for 10 minutes it is obvious they are not close to meeting 50% disability. However, elderly retired vets who went out at a low rank, are 60-70% but are completely unemployable. and live in high cost-of-living areas could certainly fall into this category.
I think this is actually something that deserves a more analytical look than simply, "are you for it or against it." We want all veterans to get all the benefits for which they qualify and not more than they have earned.
These rare "triple-dipping" instances should be taken on the merits of the individual case and not by virtue of the new, highly emotive manner in which we have lately become accustomed.
I think this is actually something that deserves a more analytical look than simply, "are you for it or against it." We want all veterans to get all the benefits for which they qualify and not more than they have earned.
These rare "triple-dipping" instances should be taken on the merits of the individual case and not by virtue of the new, highly emotive manner in which we have lately become accustomed.
(0)
(0)
Beats someone who doesn't work a day in their life getting free medical, enough food stamps to feed themselves and sell some on the side to cover their drug habit
(0)
(0)
My father served 27 years in the navy with multiple tours in Vietnam. He now has very little sight and only 1 and a half feet since diabetes (a service connected alignment) has claimed the other. He served with distinction and earned his retirement and suffers so he's earned the va and the benefits that go with it and is now over 65 and paid into social security for several decades so he's earned that as well. To make him pick one would be an insult as he busted his ass to earn these things. Nothing is being given it was hard fought and earned. I can only hope that by the time I am his age I can say I've earned my fair share so I keep plugging away. To tell someone they don't rate it just because they something else I hear lots of jealousy in there. Maybe if you worked like that you could earn like that too. If you didn't, it's just plain your fault.
(0)
(0)
Alot of us who served in the early seventies got screwed out of our some our benefits thanks to a bunch of cowards in Congress..
(0)
(0)
You can hate all you want, to serve till retirement, then to be paid by the va for being broken, and THEN on top of that ssd benefits that they earned by having a job, whats the problem? Im double dipping, 100% rated, SSD. 6 Yrs 4 Mths, 10 days active duty. Don't hate that you can't
(0)
(0)
State pays disability if you're not a veteran but the VA (federal) pays you based off that fact and you can retire (federal) without getting either. They are all separate things that don't have much to do with each other. Any one that calls that triple dipping is pretty ignorant to what triple dipping is...
(0)
(0)
I'll never be against an honorable discharged vet getting as much as possible out of the government.
(0)
(0)
Unless you were working under the table, pretty much your entire life (minus that 20+ years you served in the military) you paid into social security, so I see zero reason why you shouldn't be eligible to receive it, retired military or otherwise.
As a military retirement pension, that was another promise made to you by your dear ol' Uncle Sam. But your same ol' dear uncle wants to re-negotiate the terms of deal? Uh-nuh.
IMO, if you paid into social security, you should be able to use it if you meet the conditions for receiving it. If you meet the qualifications for receiving a military pension, you should be able to use that as well. None of this "but only if you have a rating over 173% AND ONLY IF..." crap. You sacrificed a part of your paycheck and a whole lot more than that. You earned it.
As a military retirement pension, that was another promise made to you by your dear ol' Uncle Sam. But your same ol' dear uncle wants to re-negotiate the terms of deal? Uh-nuh.
IMO, if you paid into social security, you should be able to use it if you meet the conditions for receiving it. If you meet the qualifications for receiving a military pension, you should be able to use that as well. None of this "but only if you have a rating over 173% AND ONLY IF..." crap. You sacrificed a part of your paycheck and a whole lot more than that. You earned it.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next

Retirement
