Posted on Jul 28, 2015
Should we be manufacturing or restoring more tanks?
4.09K
21
11
1
1
0
Given the fact that Russia is developing such vehicles as the T14 Armata and the lighter Sprut. Coupled with the fact that they are acting more aggressively in Europe should we be building or restoring more tanks?
http://breakingdefense.com/2015/07/ground-combat-vehicles-3/?utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=20879297&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-_o_qJ5CLBj-Pf0k7ZFMh1vKXvOpBmr_9oxNUk0ElAVmuqAutpVaEAGIBpRfepew1Dc3g0xSatfrb7U-0wObfxXSKM7_Q&_hsmi=20879297
http://breakingdefense.com/2015/07/ground-combat-vehicles-3/?utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=20879297&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-_o_qJ5CLBj-Pf0k7ZFMh1vKXvOpBmr_9oxNUk0ElAVmuqAutpVaEAGIBpRfepew1Dc3g0xSatfrb7U-0wObfxXSKM7_Q&_hsmi=20879297
Tanks
Europe
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 4
4
4
0
Restoring or upgrade current stock I believe is fine. As much as they have upgraded the Bradley's and continually improve on all I think we're fine.
What we need to do (which we are starting to) is get back to is the Combined Arms. Bradley's and Tanks fighting together.
What we need to do (which we are starting to) is get back to is the Combined Arms. Bradley's and Tanks fighting together.
(4)
(0)
2
2
0
Refurbish and upgrade current stock.is fine but how can anyone say a tank is no longer a viable asset? 100000 dollar missile or 12000 dollar sabot round
(2)
(0)
0
0
0
It's not that big a worry - it's a protected industry.
Remember this from a few years ago?
http://security.blogs.cnn.com/2012/10/09/army-to-congress-thanks-but-no-tanks/#com-head
Remember this from a few years ago?
http://security.blogs.cnn.com/2012/10/09/army-to-congress-thanks-but-no-tanks/#com-head
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google