Posted on Oct 26, 2017
Should welfare recipients have work requirements and be drug tested?
7.8K
58
17
8
8
0
I'm ineligible for welfare or public assistance. However, it angers me that as a taxpayer, I'm essentially paying the recipients of welfare or public assistance to be lazy. Most states don't have a work requirement in order to receive welfare which I think is wrong. How is it fair that I don't qualify for assistance and I work for my money, but a lot of welfare/public assistance recipients don't work and get assistance anyway. Also, why shouldn't recipients of welfare/public assistance be drug tested? It's not racist to check and see if someone is on drugs when they are using the assistance of welfare. Again, I don't qualify for welfare or public assistance, but I work hard and most jobs out there require a drug test before you're hired and some require drug tests while you work in certain positions. Why do people that work for their money have to be drug tested, but the people who don't work for the help they're receiving don't?
Drugs
Welfare
Working
Requirements
Fairness
Posted 7 y ago
Responses: 15
10
10
0
Yes on both counts and I can understand your frustration. Welfare has become a "trap" to keep people in poverty while turning away those genuinely in need of assistance.
I remember when I was a young kid trying to make it on his own. I was working 3 jobs to keep a roof over my head and pay my way through school. I was barely making ends meet. So like any person looking for a change, I picked up the local realtor book to see if I could find a cheaper apartment.
Found a livable complex within walking distance of my school and the rent was 50% of what I was currently paying. So I jumped at the opportunity. Saved up for the usual First/Last/Security deposit. Filled out the application.
Got denied immediately.
You make too much money. This is for low income housing only. I was literally spending 75% of my current income on rent and the rest on school and food. But apparently I make too much money to be allowed to live in a place that would have helped me get back on my feet and better my financial situation.
Now flip the perspective to the people actually living in the complex. Why should any of them even attempt to try and move up in the world knowing that they could lose their rent controlled apartment for making a single dollar more.
I remember when I was a young kid trying to make it on his own. I was working 3 jobs to keep a roof over my head and pay my way through school. I was barely making ends meet. So like any person looking for a change, I picked up the local realtor book to see if I could find a cheaper apartment.
Found a livable complex within walking distance of my school and the rent was 50% of what I was currently paying. So I jumped at the opportunity. Saved up for the usual First/Last/Security deposit. Filled out the application.
Got denied immediately.
You make too much money. This is for low income housing only. I was literally spending 75% of my current income on rent and the rest on school and food. But apparently I make too much money to be allowed to live in a place that would have helped me get back on my feet and better my financial situation.
Now flip the perspective to the people actually living in the complex. Why should any of them even attempt to try and move up in the world knowing that they could lose their rent controlled apartment for making a single dollar more.
(10)
(0)
6
6
0
5
5
0
My feeling is that I have to pass a drug test before starting & then periodic and random tests to keep the job where my wages are taxed to pay for that welfare money... so, yes.
Work requirements would certainly be a step in the right direction as well. Welfare is meant to be a helping hand when someone is down on their luck, not a career.
Work requirements would certainly be a step in the right direction as well. Welfare is meant to be a helping hand when someone is down on their luck, not a career.
(5)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google