The term IG is thrown around like a football. Should we use the IG like the boogeyman, to help improve orgs or both? What's your IG story?

In my only experience involving the IG, I formally reported alleged abuse of authority by an officer in my chain of command in 1984. Unfortunately for me, the IG (the deputy base commander) was a good friend of that officer. As you might imagine, it didn't turn out well for me. However, as you can see, the incident didn't hold me back. The officer in question did not fare as well. Lesson...stay true, keep your integrity, and press on. Keeping silent is collusion at the worst, and cowardice at the least. Say something! Do something!

No examples given, but I do believe they serve a definite beneficial function. The problem is it seems that no one takes action on the faults and issues uncovered. If they do, they are in line for seeking other employment. IMO, an action plan should be mandated and tracked for anything they find.

Being a former IG, I don't think we need to throw around the word IG like its the boogieman but we should remember what the purpose of an IG is. Commanders at all levels should have some type of command inspection program to ensure subordinate units are in compliance will all policy's and regulations. I was proud to be an IG and happy that I was able to help those who made complaints. However, I do remember very early in my career the thought of an IG inspection caused fear and ruined careers. I understand that some IG offices have changed but others have not which is sad. At the end of the day the IG is there to be unbiased and investigate the complaint and make a recommendation based off of facts with backup documentation.