Posted on Oct 30, 2015
U.S. to send dozens of special forces to Syria as advisors. Your thoughts?
17.1K
113
44
9
9
0
The United States will deploy dozens of special operations troops to northern Syria from next month to advise opposition forces in their fight against Islamic State, a major policy shift for President Barack Obama and a step he has long resisted to avoid getting dragged into another war in the Middle East.
The planned deployment, along with the U.S. decision this week to include Iran in diplomatic efforts to end the conflict, represents the biggest change in the United States' Syria policy since it began a bombing campaign against Islamic State targets there in September 2014.
Announcing the measure on Friday, the White House said the troops would be on a mission to "train, advise and assist" and would number fewer than 50. Spokesman Josh Earnest declined to give details about their exact role.
The decision by Obama, deeply averse to committing troops to unpopular wars in the Middle East, would mark the first sustained U.S. troop presence in Syria and raise the risk of American casualties, although U.S. officials stressed the forces were not meant to engage in front-line combat.
"This is a dangerous place on the globe and they are at risk, and there's no denying that," said Earnest, who repeatedly rejected the idea that the deployment would constitute a ground combat mission, which Obama has long rejected as a solution in Syria.
Earnest said the new mission in Syria was open ended and did not rule out the possibility of sending additional special forces troops into Iraq. Obama spoke to Iraqi Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi on Friday about the fight against Islamic State, Earnest said.
The Obama administration is under pressure to ramp up America's effort against Islamic State, particularly after the militant group captured the Iraqi city of Ramadi in May and following the failure of a U.S. military program to train and arm thousands of Syrian rebels.
The planned deployment adds to an increasingly volatile conflict in Syria, where Russia and Iran have increased up their military support for President Bashar al-Assad's fight against rebels in the four-and-a-half year civil war.
Russia said when it began air strikes last month that it would also target the Islamic State militant group, but its planes have hit other rebel groups opposed to Assad, including groups backed by Washington.
The decision to send U.S. special forces to Syria will put U.S. forces "in harm's way," U.S. Defense Secretary Ash Carter said on Friday, adding he did not rule out the possibility of further special forces deployments to Syria.
This month a U.S. soldier was killed in Iraq participating in a Kurdish-led mission to rescue Islamic State hostages.
He we go again , they are calling the Troops "Advisers." Where have we heard that before?
The planned deployment, along with the U.S. decision this week to include Iran in diplomatic efforts to end the conflict, represents the biggest change in the United States' Syria policy since it began a bombing campaign against Islamic State targets there in September 2014.
Announcing the measure on Friday, the White House said the troops would be on a mission to "train, advise and assist" and would number fewer than 50. Spokesman Josh Earnest declined to give details about their exact role.
The decision by Obama, deeply averse to committing troops to unpopular wars in the Middle East, would mark the first sustained U.S. troop presence in Syria and raise the risk of American casualties, although U.S. officials stressed the forces were not meant to engage in front-line combat.
"This is a dangerous place on the globe and they are at risk, and there's no denying that," said Earnest, who repeatedly rejected the idea that the deployment would constitute a ground combat mission, which Obama has long rejected as a solution in Syria.
Earnest said the new mission in Syria was open ended and did not rule out the possibility of sending additional special forces troops into Iraq. Obama spoke to Iraqi Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi on Friday about the fight against Islamic State, Earnest said.
The Obama administration is under pressure to ramp up America's effort against Islamic State, particularly after the militant group captured the Iraqi city of Ramadi in May and following the failure of a U.S. military program to train and arm thousands of Syrian rebels.
The planned deployment adds to an increasingly volatile conflict in Syria, where Russia and Iran have increased up their military support for President Bashar al-Assad's fight against rebels in the four-and-a-half year civil war.
Russia said when it began air strikes last month that it would also target the Islamic State militant group, but its planes have hit other rebel groups opposed to Assad, including groups backed by Washington.
The decision to send U.S. special forces to Syria will put U.S. forces "in harm's way," U.S. Defense Secretary Ash Carter said on Friday, adding he did not rule out the possibility of further special forces deployments to Syria.
This month a U.S. soldier was killed in Iraq participating in a Kurdish-led mission to rescue Islamic State hostages.
He we go again , they are calling the Troops "Advisers." Where have we heard that before?
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 26
We have had enough boots on the ground. When is it up to someone else to be responsible for themselves. At some point there needs to be personal accountability for one's self. We will eventually run ourselves into the ground with nothing to show for it because we will never be appreciated for our efforts.
(6)
(0)
SPC (Join to see)
SSG Carlos Lane - Yea. But our debt is held by a country that cannot call it in. So for now they will continue to push it off
(1)
(0)
SPC (Join to see)
Another perspective though is the precedent America has set over the past century of not being the nation to turn from atrocity. From WW1 onward. WW1 our hand was forced to action as well as WW2. The undereducated citizens of the world though now shout and complain about how America starts wars, perpetuates wars, etc... But they don't understand the importance.
Look at this specific issue. IS. How many countered intervened when America said we were sitting out initially? None. We state we're going to start air operations. How many followed us. Nations of the world now only act when America does. Not only that but look at post WW2 Europe. We (America) allowed those nations to rebuild due to our military might protecting them. The years to follow and even now the reason those nations can keep a small defense spending budget is because they are sheltered by the what I like to call it the "American Military Might Umbrella". Or "freedombrella" Euoore has known an unprescedented economic growth over the last century as well as a unprecedented time of peace within its continent (relatively) under the protection of America.
Should it be this way? Should we be responsible as "world police" ? No probably not, but we're Americans and now that belief is in our blood. We can't turn away.
Look at this specific issue. IS. How many countered intervened when America said we were sitting out initially? None. We state we're going to start air operations. How many followed us. Nations of the world now only act when America does. Not only that but look at post WW2 Europe. We (America) allowed those nations to rebuild due to our military might protecting them. The years to follow and even now the reason those nations can keep a small defense spending budget is because they are sheltered by the what I like to call it the "American Military Might Umbrella". Or "freedombrella" Euoore has known an unprescedented economic growth over the last century as well as a unprecedented time of peace within its continent (relatively) under the protection of America.
Should it be this way? Should we be responsible as "world police" ? No probably not, but we're Americans and now that belief is in our blood. We can't turn away.
(1)
(0)
Read This Next


Military Advisor
War on Terror
