Posted on Apr 14, 2015
CW3 Network Architect
22.3K
39
56
1
1
0
If you're on orders, and a battle assembly falls in that time period, I've always been taught that you don't have to make it up, that you get a 'B' code (on orders) and don't have to make it up unless you want to. Now I have a friend who's in WLC for 2 weeks, a BA falls during that time, and they're making her make it up. Does anyone have a regulatory cite to prove she doesn't have to?

UPDATE:
Thanks to my friend's chain of command just not giving a rip about their Soldiers' civilian job commitments, as evidenced by establishing a MUTA-12 for no good reason, my friend decided to let her contract expire, and she is no longer in the Guard at all. Thanks for the advice, everyone. She's a happy civilian now.
Posted in these groups: United states ar seal.svg Army Reserve
Edited >1 y ago
Avatar feed
Responses: 22
COL Vincent Stoneking
8
8
0
Edited >1 y ago
Edit: The following paragraph is wrong, as SSG (Join to see) 's reference to the regulation shows. It is clearly at the commander's discretion. I am leaving it unchanged, because I believe that's how it SHOULD work. Of course, that and a buck will get me a cup of coffee.

No. You cannot be required to "make up." You are already in a paid status on those days. Your recollection is exactly correct, should be coded as "on orders." End of story. This is not like an RST or and Auth Absence, where the CMD needs to approve (rather, they did when they approved the orders....)

That said, lots of units seem to decide that the rules are different than the rules. In fact, I would say most. At that point it becomes a "hill I'm willing to die on" question. In my case, I would happily "make up" the drill dates, though I don't think the reg would allow it to be as an RST - would have to be an additional drill. Having been on orders, there is nothing to reschedule.... If I had a civilian job that was highly inflexible, I might have a different opinion.

CPT Catherine R. can you supply the relevant reg(s)?
(8)
Comment
(0)
CPT Catherine R.
CPT Catherine R.
>1 y
Full disclosure: I haven't worked USAR finance for over a year BUT I did work it for 15 years prior.

AR 140-1, 3-10.
"c. Soldiers attending schools in a ADT or AT status. Soldiers ordered to active duty under 10 USC 672(d), 673, or
673(b) may be credited with constructive attendance if the commander determines that the service is equivalent to the
training the soldier would have received during the scheduled IDT period and additional attendance at IDT constitutes
undue personal hardship. When the above criteria are met, constructive attendance credit will be granted to soldiers
who consent to attend schools in ADT status and are ordered to active duty under 10 USC 672(d). Soldiers ordered to
active duty are not entitled to IDT pay for assemblies missed while on active duty"
(0)
Reply
(0)
CW2(P) Construction Engineering Technician
CW2(P) (Join to see)
>1 y
I think it is actually coded as T for Training. While I was at WOCS, I was on AD orders, but could not make up the BA I missed because it was coded as T for Training. In my previous experience as a squad leader. If I had a soldier under me or in my platoon that was going to miss a BA because of school, I would ask the soldier if they wanted to be able to make up the BA before or after the school dates. I would then go to the PSG, PL Leader, then the 1SG & CO to ask if they could make up the BA. It should be up to the soldier and the CO. Of course if they are approved before they go to csholl to be able to make up the BA; the coding will not be T it will be one for RST.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SSG Financial Management Technician
SSG (Join to see)
>1 y
Code T is when a Soldier is at basic training.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SFC Human Resources Specialist
SFC (Join to see)
>1 y
T is if a Soldier is at any type of training
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
COL Senior Account Executive
5
5
0
Edited >1 y ago
I'm wondering what task is so critical that a Commander would force an E4 to drill a few more days? Sounds like some CPT trying to puff their chest. I don't get it. It smacks in the face of the CARs intent to provide work/life balance. In addition, it also violates the CARs guidance of what takes precedence, PME over BA/AT. Regardless of statute, this absolute does not pass the common sense test. There is absolutely NO training event so significant that some E4 (or anyone for that matter) needs to come back and do two more days of duty to accomplish, ESPECIALLY after putting them on ORDERS at a school during BA. SMH? Personally if one of my Company Commanders did that and the Soldier open doored me as the Battalion Commander I would grant it at my level and offer the CPT a lesson on karma. Now if the Soldier needed the money and WANTED to do a few days in the office I'd be happy to grant that RST at a mutually convenient time for them and the unit full timers.
(5)
Comment
(0)
CW3 Network Architect
CW3 (Join to see)
>1 y
You'd be surprised, COL (Join to see) a couple of units ago, I had an E4 that was in a unit in Baltimore wanting to come down to the unit I was in at Fort Belvoir....mainly due to him living in Fairfax Station, and having no LIK for Baltimore....

That unit demanded that his transfer packet get approved by the BATTALION commander....for an E4 non-MOSQ.

It's gotta be a Reserve thing. Too many officers want control down to too low of a level.
(0)
Reply
(0)
CPT Hhc Company Commander
CPT (Join to see)
>1 y
COL (Join to see) - Sir, although this isn't a route that I would take, the only examples that I can come up with are a potentially deploying unit in which he is in the roster somehow, in which time we would be looking to do pre-mob things like SRP and planning.

Option 2 is if the Soldier is failing to meet a standard such as height weight and APFT. Regardless, this seems like a hard line approach to me.... but with some restrictions paved on us by higher, it may be the commander trying to find a creative to maximize available resources on a scarce MOS or enhance mission readiness.

I still agree that this doesn't pass a common sense test..... but I'd like to think the are other viable options. Call me the hopeless optimist. Lol
V/R,
CPT Butler
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
LTC John Shaw
5
5
0
JD, The coding on the Commanders Pay report is based on what the Commander decides.
The soldier still needs to submit an RST exception for the WLC course and have the discussion at that time if the BA will be shifted to Alternate dates or 'excused'. Ultimately this is the commanders call.
Maybe an S1 type will tell us something different, but that is how I ran my units.
(5)
Comment
(0)
LTC Instructor
LTC (Join to see)
>1 y
CW3 (Join to see), I'm in total agreement with LTC John Shaw. Those MUTAs are the commander's prerogative to control, of course under the 1SG's advice. A commander cannot take those days away from a Soldier, but certainly can force a Soldier to use them to accomplish the mission.

With that said, I would probably come down in favor of permitting the absence. This is a junior leader who has just completed a great accomplishment, completing WLC and hopefully becoming an NCO. On the other hand, the commander may have pressure to maximize use of MUTAs because of the budget environment. USARC is held responsible for unused MUTAs; if you aren't using them, why have them?

Also, if the Soldier in question has particular skills or unique responsibilities, USR or UPL for instance, that cannot be fulfilled by another, then I would definitely require use of the MUTAs.
(1)
Reply
(0)
CW3 Network Architect
CW3 (Join to see)
>1 y
Then the orders should have been scheduled for a period that doesn't cause the soldier to miss the BA if it's that important. This is a soldier getting the shaft due to poor leadership.
(1)
Reply
(0)
LTC John Shaw
LTC John Shaw
>1 y
CW3 (Join to see) I get your point. I will allow an authorized absence but I would ask the soldier to RST with a specific activity that will either help the soldier, section, squad or unit maintain readiness. It is part of training soldiers to step up beyond the minimum expected, as we all must do in the NG or Reserve. I can't remember the last time, I just did the once a month activity. Most work in the Reserve is w/o pay, after 3 retirement points.
(0)
Reply
(0)
CPT Pedro Meza
CPT Pedro Meza
>1 y
It is all about retirement points, you can be excused for drills, but no retirement points will be given. The same applies for the points that the unit receives for its members having all the points required.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Avatar feed
USAR: On orders during BA - must be made up or no?
MAJ Secretary Of The General Staff
2
2
0
AR 140-1, 20 January 2004. Para 3-10.c Soldiers attending schools in ADT or AT status. Soldiers ordered to active duty under 10 USC 672 (d), 673, or 673(b) may be credited with constructive attendance if the commander determines that the service is equivalent to the training soldier would have received during the schedule IDT period and additional attendance at IDT constitutes undue personal hardship. When the above criteria are met, constructive attendance credit will be granted to soldiers who consent at attend schools in ADT status and are order to active duty under 10 USC 672(d). Soldiers order to active duty are not entitled to IDT pay for assemblies missed while on active duty.

I hear the last sentence here being abused. Yes you cannot pay a soldier IDT pay if on a duty order, but that does not stop them from rescheduling that duty period for a later time to conduct the training missed if not at on orders with the unit.
(2)
Comment
(0)
CW3 Network Architect
CW3 (Join to see)
>1 y
Yes, they're making her RST during the week upon her return from WLC.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
1SG Civil Affairs Specialist
2
2
0
Technically, if you are on orders you should be coded as a "C" in the pay book. These are not allowed to be made up.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
MAJ Senior Observer   Controller/Trainer
2
2
0
I've always trained with the understanding that yes, you'd have to make those Drills up.
(2)
Comment
(0)
CPT Pedro Meza
CPT Pedro Meza
>1 y
I was told that if you want the retirement points that you must have the right number of battle assembly, so being forced to make up drill is a necessity.
(1)
Reply
(0)
LTC Latin Teacher
LTC (Join to see)
>1 y
CPT Pedro Meza That's not necessary. If it were, then all of those years spent deployed would be null and void for retirement. Now, if the Soldier wants an RST, then he/or she is allowed to make up some of that time for points and pay, but it isn't necessary for retirement purposes. For a "good year" all you need is 50 points, and it doesn't matter how you got them.
(2)
Reply
(0)
CPT Pedro Meza
CPT Pedro Meza
>1 y
Michael, deployments and active duty longer then 30 days take precedents over the drill rules, the purpose is so that drilling reservist that have no other active service receive due benefits for years of service. Don't laugh but its throw a dog a bone rule for reservist for their time. RST serves the same purpose.
(0)
Reply
(0)
COL Vincent Stoneking
COL Vincent Stoneking
>1 y
LTC (Join to see) I'll have to dig it up, put I'm pretty sure I saw something the other day that said that you needed at least 1 IDT or ADT point for it to count as a good year. I'll have to hunt it down again when I am at the office tomorrow, unless I just mis-remembered it.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
MAJ Military Personnel And Administrative Specialist
1
1
0
I've had the same understanding as you, that is was optional to make it up.
AR 135-91 in chapter 3 states: TPU soldiers are required to participate in at least 48 scheduled inactive duty training (IDT)s, and not less than 14 days. To me that means the Soldier would not be required to makeup the dates. She should be excused from BA because she has approved orders to be elsewhere, however like most things, it is at the commander's discretion whether or not she has to makeup her missed MUTAs.

It is better for the Soldier long-term if she intends to retire. Every day adds to her points that determines her pay in the end; AR 140-185.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Financial Management Technician
1
1
0
BLUF: It is the Commander's discretion to excuse a Soldier from BTA.

AR 135-91 Para 3-1 states:

TPU soldiers are required to participate in at least 48 scheduled inactive duty training (IDT)s, and not less than 14 days, exclusive of travel time, of annual training. Satisfactory participation is defined below.
a. Attending all scheduled inactive duty training (IDT) (IDT)s unless excused by the unit commander or granted a leave of absence. Soldiers present at a scheduled inactive duty training (IDT) will not receive credit for attendance unless they are wearing the prescribed uniform. They must also present a neat and soldierly appearance and perform
assigned duties in a satisfactory manner as determined by the unit commander. Soldiers who do not receive credit for attendance for any of the reasons noted above will be charged with an unexcused absence (chap 4, sec III).
b. Attending and satisfactorily completing the entire period of AT unless excused by proper authority.
c. Obtaining a unit assignment during an authorized leave of absence (chap 4, sec IV).

AR 135-91 para 4-8 also states:

All situations not specifically identified in this paragraph or section V are considered unexcused absences. Absence from scheduled inactive duty training (IDT)s, training, or AT may be excused. Such absences may be excused when sickness, injury, or some other circumstance beyond the soldier’s control caused the absence. At the discretion of the
appropriate commander (para 4–2), ET may be scheduled to make up the excused absence. (See para 3–llc for excusing USAR AMEDD officers.)

AR 135-91 para 4-10:

a. Employers sometimes schedule several weeks of career training, which prevents the soldier from attending inactive duty training (IDT)s. When this occurs the circumstances may in the judgment of the unit commander, justify rescheduled training (RST) authorization,
b. Employment conflicts, overtime, schooling, and loss of income are not normally considered valid reasons for absence from training. If any of these conditions create a continuing hardship, the unit commander will refer the case through channels to the approval authority. The general officer commander (for USAR) or the State adjutant general
(for ARNGUS) will decide whether to retain or remove the soldier from the unit. While awaiting this decision, the soldier is required to participate.

There is a regulatory requirement to have approximately 85% of the unit attending the drill, but that escapes me. If I'm at school at there is a IWQ or other mandatory training to attend, I fully expect my Commander to order me to RST to complete that required training.
(1)
Comment
(0)
SSG Financial Management Technician
SSG (Join to see)
>1 y
I can only suspect that the RST is being done during the week with supervision of the FTUS. Obviously, it can be difficult for the Soldier to come in during the week as it would cut in during schooling, civilian work, childcare; it is likely being done that way so AGR and Miltechs can easily supervise her rather than coming in during the weekend.

An alternative could be for the Soldier to RST at another unit within commuting distance that would drill on the weekend with both unit Commander's permission.
(0)
Reply
(0)
COL Vincent Stoneking
COL Vincent Stoneking
>1 y
SSG (Join to see) Thanks for your very informative posts. I was 100% sure of my original answer, and 100% wrong. I like half of that.

I still think it's a bad move by the commander, clearly within regulations. I could have been more of a jerk than my Soldiers thought I was....
(0)
Reply
(0)
CPT Catherine R.
CPT Catherine R.
>1 y
AR 140-1, 3-10
c. Soldiers attending schools in a ADT or AT status. Soldiers ordered to active duty under 10 USC 672(d), 673, or
673(b) may be credited with constructive attendance if the commander determines that the service is equivalent to the
training the soldier would have received during the scheduled IDT period and additional attendance at IDT constitutes
undue personal hardship. When the above criteria are met, constructive attendance credit will be granted to soldiers
who consent to attend schools in ADT status and are ordered to active duty under 10 USC 672(d). Soldiers ordered to
active duty are not entitled to IDT pay for assemblies missed while on active duty
(0)
Reply
(0)
SSG Financial Management Technician
SSG (Join to see)
>1 y
If a Soldier was authorized to have the duty credited toward their scheduled IDT period I would request the school house to forward their training schedule and TLO to the training section of the unit to be input into DTMS IAW AR 350-1. It beefs up the Soldier's ITR and makes the unit look better for mission.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
LTC Latin Teacher
1
1
0
If she wanted to make them up, and if she followed the RST policy of the command, then she could be coded an 'S'. However, if she isn't present, but is at school then the commander has to put, at the very least, at 'T'. He cannot force her to make up the time, and if he codes it anything else (A or U), then she has the orders to prove that she was in fact accounted for.
(1)
Comment
(0)
CW3 Network Architect
CW3 (Join to see)
>1 y
That's the issue, LTC (Join to see) , she feels she shouldn't have to make up the BA as she was on orders at the time...she did her time.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Wheeled Vehicle Mechanic
0
0
0
Chief, I have a SPC in my squad going to school for a second MOS and in a few months he'll be going to BLC. We also have an E6 in our platoon going to WOC school. They're both excused from BA because they're on orders. During company formation the PSG (and other PSGs with similar situations) report them differently. Rather than reporting them "out of ranks" or "U," they're reported as "on orders." In my irrelevant opinion, it doesn't make sense for them to have her make up time on orders, she's already doing something for the Army. I'm sure you've had a lot of other answers already, and I'm sure someone's pointed out a regulation, just thought I'd share my limited experience.

As far as her CoC not giving a hoot about her civilian job, while difficult on the soldier, that's what we signed up for. It's the soldier's responsibility to make arrangements months in advance. I've had to make arrangements with employers and professors. We're soldiers first.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close