Posted on Oct 6, 2015
CPT Senior Instructor
43.8K
149
95
19
19
0
20a3cc32
A long time ago when I first came into the Army as a young PFC you were required to attend PLDC, or Primary Leadership Development Course, before you could pin on your stripes. Even those of us that were promoted on a waiver while deployed had to attend within a certain timeframe or we would lose our stripes.

I was a fan of this system. I believe that institutional instruction was an asset to professional development. But when the Army moved to the Warrior Leaders Course only being a requirement to attain the promotable status as a SGT we lost ground in professional development. Over time you would have less and less institutionally trained NCOs developing other NCOs. I have found that the SSD's try to make up for this but I rarely find that anyone take these serious. They are more of a check the blocks than the gates to being an NCO.

For those that have been in long enough do believe this affected the NCO corps? Did the Army NCO Corps maintain their professionalism without going to the school house to be an NCO?
Edited 10 y ago
Avatar feed
Responses: 41
CW4 Russ Hamilton (Ret)
3
3
0
Edited 10 y ago
Soldiers desiring to be promoted should be self-starters. This means they should take the initiative to learn everything necessary to move up to the next level. Units should ensure these prospective Soldiers have a mentor in the next higher grade bringing them along. These Soldiers should be placed as an acting team or squad leader position and mentored. These prospective “promotees” should know everything they need to know before they attend that required NCOES course. To me, nearly all professional development schools lasting 1 – 2 months (or less) are nothing more than check the box schools – same with online training. In my opinion, it is the Soldier’s, the Soldier’s peers, their chain of command and the unit’s responsibility to ensure they are promoting Soldiers who are prepared for the next higher grade, not because of completion of a school.

The Soldier’s unit (and the Army) ultimately has to live with the consequences of a Soldier being promoted – sending them to a school and then absolving themselves of responsibility for that Soldier’s poor performance if they turn out to be a dud is a failure of the unit and the chain of command. NCO professional development (or Warrant Officer/Regular Officer) schools should not be viewed as magical “wave a wand and poof – instant success for promotion" schools. They are not. They should be viewed as tools and as a basic standardized “test” (because we need something to evaluate knowledge and basic leadership skills). Think about it – How many NCO’s do you know who have attended every school out there but couldn’t lead a squad out of a wet paper bag? Again, same for Warrant Officers and Officers. I will also sadly note as an example: The Warrant Officer Corps has been polluted with many inept Warrant Officers because of the reliance of passing a school as opposed to units and the chain of command ensuring the Soldier is truly PREPARED and QUALIFIED to become a Warrant Officer. I’ve been in for 37 years and I’ve seen this (reliance on schools alone) happen way too much. Paper Soldiers do not necessarily equate to good Soldiers. End rant.

1LT Rosa, to more basically answer your question, yes, I believe Soldiers should attend a required RESIDENT professional development school prior to being promoted to the next level and I think we should do away with most of this PD online training we all have to do these days. Units must properly prepare Soldiers for promotion from within and attendance at the resident course becomes the "check the box" element. Regardless, the Soldier is fully prepared for promotion BEFORE attending the resident course.
(3)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSgt Carpenter
3
3
0
Edited 10 y ago
Hopefully there's enough NCOES school slots for Guard troops, otherwise it will simply mean that we have even more SPC team leaders, and SGT squad leaders than we already do. Even so, I don't think it's a bad thing that we're going back to that system.
(3)
Comment
(0)
SFC Management
SFC (Join to see)
10 y
There's plenty of seats out there. The problem were running into is funding. When it was a 2 week course you could send on AT orders in lieu of going to AT. Now with it being. 3 weeks it is creating a funding vacuum
(1)
Reply
(0)
SSgt Carpenter
SSgt (Join to see)
10 y
SFC (Join to see) , all I knew is that it seems to be like pulling hens teeth right now.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SFC Management
SFC (Join to see)
10 y
Must be your State and whether or not they requested enough seats. I've got 12 Soldiers going to WLC between 1 Oct and middle of next year. AT is going to suck, but they need their pro development first. Also if your unit is tracking it good 90 days out from the start of a class they send out any vacant seats and it's a free for all nationwide for anyone that grabs them
(1)
Reply
(0)
CPT Senior Instructor
CPT (Join to see)
10 y
Seats are hard to come by due to the allotment of funds. I am sure the school house could handle more but as mentioned it is hard to get those seats paid for. Just as SFC (Join to see) said a lot of times soldiers will go there in lieu of AT. We are doing the same thing. Our AT is going to look like a small panic due to this but professional development should be a priority.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Us Army Retired
2
2
0
I am glad we are going back to it
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Writer
2
2
0
Side rant: I remember doing SSD V as a SPC (P). It wasn't easy either.
(2)
Comment
(0)
CSM Carl Cunningham
CSM Carl Cunningham
10 y
You cannot do SSD V as a SPC (P). In fact, it only come out earlier this year. You may want to evaluate your comment.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SGT Writer
SGT (Join to see)
10 y
Had to check my VMET to clarify. You're right. It was SSD IV I completed.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Jeffrey Harper
1
1
0
SFC Joe Davis I totally agree with you. I saw to many times soilders get promoted any don’t understand what it really means. I agree the SQT show come back. The promotion system should change to getting tested on your job knowledge much like the airforces, this would weed out the one just rank chasing and not knowing thier MOS. To many troops are slotted in MOS slot they are not school trained for and it being held against them come promoting recommendation time. But as we know before with changes come complains about how unfair it is they everyone has to be tested about thier knowledge. The Army needs to truly change!!
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Recruiter
1
1
0
I disagree. Under this model, developing leaders is a forcing function of the organization, not the institution or the Army. If leaders focused on cultivating their junior NCOs through training and leader development, we wouldn't need an automated SSD. Our NCO Corps can be stronger, but before we point the finger at an institution to develop our junior NCOs, we need to tighten up how training is conducted specifically in their development.
(1)
Comment
(0)
CPT Senior Instructor
CPT (Join to see)
10 y
You are exactly right. I mentioned something to this. After a few rounds of promotion you had underdeveloped NCOs underdeveloping younger NCOs. It was diminishing gains. It just kept dimishing.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SGM G3 Sergeant Major
1
1
0
1LT Eric Rosa, I too attended PLDC as a young Soldier (SPC) this was a requirement to make SGT and believe it was great benefit for aspiring NCOs. During the beginnings of and up to and through the height of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. The Army was promoting all NCOs without the next step ( or within a year/ or the next highest NCOES only being required). This allowed us to promote deserving NCOs when NCOES was difficult to obtain, but at the same time as with all good ideas we allowed those not quite up to that level yet to join the ranks. I believe the Army is in the infancy of righting those instances and the system will fix itself. However, you as all of us had to endure some growing pains.
(1)
Comment
(0)
CPT Senior Instructor
CPT (Join to see)
10 y
I agree. Looking back at my early years at Bragg the Army wasn't perfect but it seemed pretty close. I recall the first line of the NCO creed. It meant something. It wasn't just a relic to be recited at some lame NCO induction ceremony. I do agree we are just now adjusting the system. I don't think it was necessarily wrong but the way it was handled was. I think the Army put a lot of faith in the recommendations of some leaders and some boards also. Then it started. Soon you have ill prepared NCOs writing NCOERs for other NCOs. They really didn't master their last job do to moving up so fast so now they rate a soldier on what they think and not what the FMs says is their responsibility.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CW3 Platoon Leader
1
1
0
I have noticed that so many that are being promoted without looking forward to whether they will ever be able to progress. The tempo of deployments has made it difficult to hold Soldiers back from promotion but if they have a history of height weight or work issues they should be scrutinized. I grew u in the you dont promote until you get the appropriate education I think its the right way to weed out the non performers.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
MSG Sr Culinary Mgt
1
1
0
Yes, sir. I believe this has messed up the NCO Corp. It seems as if all anyone care about is making rank so they get paid. They dont care aboyt soldier development, just themselves. You can't get anyone to fo theur job, because they feel like we owe them something. Army can change with the time, but changing time doesn't mean take away discipline. We now have a softer Army, because of this.
(1)
Comment
(0)
CPT Senior Instructor
CPT (Join to see)
10 y
To the credit of the Army they are trying to address this. I understand why it happened but if some really took to Mentoring then it would have not took such a hit. It just goes to show why we have so many requirements.
(0)
Reply
(0)
MSG Sr Culinary Mgt
MSG (Join to see)
10 y
Leadership is leadership.. Regardless, of the hiccups.. My thing is we dont have enough leaders who want to lead and mentor these young soldiers.. I am one LEADER who loves to prove that there are leaders who are not here for just a paycheck. I love this institution we have and i appreciate all opportunities that i have been given to serve. I just want to show that leaders do care about them and their families journey.. Big Army dont need to do much, but back the Leaders who are doing whats right.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
MSG Platoon Sergeant
1
1
0
The Ncoes courses today hardly resemble what they were back during Pldc. SSD courses are a great concept, however the check on learning and principles discussed do not corellate to the comparable rank of the course. The course assumes the responsibilities of the highest levels of joint staff some how are significant to the squad level leader. Going to and from school driven promotion systems has significant impact on national guard and reserve soldiers that aren't afforded the same access to NCOES courses.
(1)
Comment
(0)
CPT Senior Instructor
CPT (Join to see)
10 y
You make a great point. Officers are no different. It took me a year after commissioning to get to my Infantry Officers Course. I would if this would be something to look at. We have soldiers that have no intent of going to WLC and are happy with just being a SGT and then we have some that are SPC and want to go to WLC as soon as they can. I have a PFC get to go to WLC. They couldn't find anyone ready to go on a extremely short notice. He was a PT stud and took them up on it. He is a SPC still but soon I see him moving up.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SSG Lumber
SSG (Join to see)
10 y
Sir,To me the only problem with this move of going back is that, funding sources. I think its great that soldiers should go to NCOES before earning their stripes, but if units don't send soldiers as is the case in the reserve components due to monetary issues I see the need for NCOs increasing.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close