I've been seeing a lot of posts on Facebook from service members upset that the Army had an elaborate fly over on Superbowl Sunday, saying that it was a waste of funds. In a time where perhaps more than ever the Army and military as a whole are pinching pennies and downsizing, do you think a flyover was appropriate?
In my opinion, civilians love seeing our (the military's) high speed equipment and vehicles. As possibly the most watched sporting event of the year, although expensive, a don't think a flyover hurt the Army's budget substantially. I agree that retirement benefits should be the militaries first priority, but for the occasion I don't think a flyover was out of line. Thoughts?
Only issue was that it was DARK and no one could see the fly-over. So yeah, our bubbas got training flight time, but I don't think it met the objective of getting exposure...
I know down here, where someone requests support they are told they have to foot the bill. Now, with the flyover, it could have been scheduled into their training calendar and those flight hours were not only for the pilots but for Army Awesomeness purposes.
this is just my theory and is in no way respresentative what the actual 5 Ws that went into this.
1SG
I am. He was my troop commander as CPT Harrington with D Trp, 3-6 Cav in Korea, one of the best commanders I have ever worked for. Him and his wife baked our entire troop cookies and taped them to our doors for Christmas, I miss working for him.
That view was pretty badass actually, we were talking today that it would have been cool if they could have dipped a little bit inside the roof before flying out.

Budget
Football
