What do you do when the evaluation redress system is not working?

What do you to when the evaluation redress system is not working? The Commander refused to conduct the inquiry and when he had no choice he purposely skewed the facts and lied.

Everything I state is backed up with documentation, emails, text, and other means legal in my state.

I posted here months ago regarding an NCOER issue. Falsified derogatory comments with no basis and falsified counseling dates. Every date. So my argument is the totality of the inaccuracies on the report should show the report is unjust and unwarranted. I got a lot of great responses from some great leaders on here. But to keep it short I have a really good case and have all evidence of actions and lack there of. My case should be open and shut and my leaders should have just fixed it based on regulatory guidance but they did not. So, I requested the Commanders Inquiry.

The issue now, and I knew this was going to be an issue from the beginning, is My Co CDR did not want to conduct the Commanders Inquiry. He clearly wants to be a bro and not a Commander. He did not communicate, he dragged his feet, never put the administrative hold on the eval, and now he’s lying on his MFR for the findings of the inquiry. I requested the inquiry in September 14 and only after no action taken I said to him on November 15 in email I am going to seek guidance from BN is when he immediately started inquiry. I told him this on November 15 and on November 16 he started. I only know he started on November 16 because that’s what he wrote in his MFR. If I didn’t mention BN he would have started at a later date or not at all.

Without saying a lot, yes he lied on an official document and made false official statements in his MFR. I eloquently explained in email and dissected everything in his MFR that was false and everything he purposely chose to exclude or miscommunicate. Needless to say the Commander said he was going to fix it. In a meeting he presented me the MFR on December 13, December 14 I sent the email, December 15 they call me to a meeting to tell me they are going to fix it and re write it. They still have not fixed it and therefore I have not signed the eval since the Commanders Inquiry is still not over for corrections according to the Co command team.

All I want is for the commander to tell what happened in the MFR so I can properly appeal. I don’t care if the raters fixes anything at this point as long as the documentation shows they had the opportunity to abide by the regulation after it was addressed. I gave a 14 page Commanders inquiry in MFR format and he wrote a one page which did not capture the evidence and actually made it seem like I’m making it up.

The rater falsified the counseling dates but the Commander told me in the meeting on 13 DEC that I have the word falsified misconstrued. Is putting dates to make it seem like I was counseled when I was not not falsification? He also wrote in his MFR “…no derogatory information was placed on the evaluation. during the meeting on 13 DEC he says the information is negative but not derogatory. Well why can’t he say negative information was placed on the evaluation? He could have left that part out like he left out all the other facts. He wants to alleviate any condemnation from his battles and make it seem like I’m lying. Negative, derogatory, unfavorable all mean the same thing. He tried to play with semantics to justify actions but they literally mean the same thing which is wild he doesn’t know that. Ar 600-37 the regulation on unfavorable information defines derogatory using multiple synonyms. It’s any information gjT calls into questions my character, reliability, trustworthiness etc. Im so tired of still dealing with this and being lied on I don’t know what to do any more.