Posted on Sep 2, 2014
MAJ Jim Woods
8.45K
14
12
1
1
0
I am curious. The Administration continues to refer the Syria/Iraq aggressors as ISIL while most media refers to them as ISIS. What, if any, is the difference?
Avatar feed
Responses: 6
1px xxx
Suspended Profile
Edited >1 y ago
MAJ Jim Woods. They are the very same BAD people . . . on the very same BAD channel!!!

Warmest Regards, Sandy
PO1 Master-at-Arms
PO1 (Join to see)
>1 y
They are bad indeed. Let's nuke'em, Sandy!
(0)
Reply
(0)
1px xxx
Suspended Profile
>1 y
PO1 (Join to see). Nuclear option is too expensive, too much radioactive and political fallout, too much collateral damage, not precise enough, no one target to nuke . . . so no go!!! These are primitive people who will understand and relate best to Warthogs, Spooky, Spectre, BUFF, Carpet Bombing, and Napalm B. Warmest Regards, Sandy
1px xxx
Suspended Profile
Edited >1 y ago
The difference is that the US Department of State, the US Government, and the United Nations . . . all use the older name ISIL to denote their refusal to recognize this particular terrorist movement and/or organization as a state ( ISIS ) . . . NOT as often supposed by conspiracy theorists as some kind of offense, denigration, or other denial of the State of Israel. Warmest Regards, Sandy

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_State_of_Iraq_and_the_Levant
SSG Aircraft Mechanic
1
1
0
The consonant at the end of the acronym?
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close