Posted on Apr 19, 2016

What is the proper way to address a Warrant Officer Candidate?

CW2 (Join to see)

88.5K

Posted in these groups: Warrant officers logo

Warrant Officers Customs and courtesies logo

Customs and Courtesies

Posted >1 y ago

Follow this discussion

Responses: 32

CW3 Dylan E. Raymond, PHR

Posted >1 y ago

He/she are to be addressed as candidate. They are no longer enlisted and not a qualified officer yet that is why they wear WOC Then once they complete WOC then they can be addressed as mr....ms....

(17)

Comment

(0)

1SG (Join to see)

Posted >1 y ago

I think we should call them 'wocs'.
"hey, woc over here", "woc this way", and the ever popular "woc, with me"

(11)

Comment

(0)

show previous comments

1SG (Join to see)

>1 y

I've applied twice. Both times my proponent disqualified me based on technical issues. For example, the support Bn I was in did not have a company in its structure. I had a Major XO, and LTC CO. The XO did the "company" LOR. The packet was DQ'd for not having a company level recommendation

(0)

CW2 Max Dolan

>1 y

Oh, I like the WOC thing! I was never a candidate. It was a direct appointment. One day it was "Staff Sergeant" and the next day it was "WHOOO!" Awhile later it was "Chief," and I still like that title.

(0)

1SG (Join to see)

>1 y

I did not know the used to do direct appointment

(0)

CW2 Max Dolan

>1 y

Yep, it happened sometimes. I was a Staff Sergeant on the E7 list at the time. I just completed a Bachelor's Degree in my field, and applied for the warrant. It took about a year to go through. My first assignment was a Detachment Commander position in Germany. Great fun!

(0)