Posted on Jun 14, 2018
What is your opinion on Donald Trump agreeing to cease all US/ROK joint training exercises?
9.31K
89
57
20
20
0
I want honest opinions about President Trump's recent promises to Kim Jong Un that we would cease all US/ROK joint training and statement to the American people that we will save a lot of money by not having bombers fly from Guam to the Korean Peninsula for training missions. Is that the sort of thing you expect from a strong POTUS?
Donald Trump
North Korea
South Korea
National Security
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 21
0
0
0
Wrong move. Kim is a master at playing Presidents for what he really wants.
(0)
(0)
0
0
0
The Trumpster is a dangerous lying psycho. Where is the questioning regarding 9/11 here? Tell me how the terrorist knew that all the war games would be on-going prior to and during 9/11? The four Air Force exercises wherein false radar blips were inserted onto FAA and NORAD radar scopes? How
did the terrorists know the best places was in the USA to turn off the transponders so radars could not see them and/or have a great deal of difficulty seeing them on radar scopes without transponders sending signals? How did they know that there were only a few US Air Force fighter jets ready to intercept a hijacked airplane in the northeast US States US?
Why were the war game, radar blips still being injected onto FAA and NORAD radar screens until at least 0930 and 1012 hours yet the second airplane crashed into the Twin Tower at 0903 hours. These US Air Force war games made it appear there were 22 hijackings on-going?
Tell my why the NORAD or FAA was tacking American Airlines 11 they believed was still in the air and an in-progress of hijacking, yet it had already crashed into the Twin Tower 08:46 AM. Why did the US Air Force Generals did not tell the 9/11 Commission about all this?
Geophysicist André Rousseau’s, PhD analysis of the seismic signals (waves) reveal explosives were used on 9/11
At the moment of the Twin Towers and WTC7 collapsed seismic waves were generated.
The degree that low frequencies are associated with an energy (magnitude) that is comparable to a seismic event, these waves undeniably have an explosive origin.
The impacts of the airplanes into the Twin Towers would not have generated large enough seismic waves to be recorded 34 km away.
Debris that fell onto the ground from the Twin Towers would not have generated large enough seismic waves to be recorded 34 km away.
The low frequencies could not have been provoked other than by explosions.
An explosion at the base of WTC1 (the north Tower and the first one hit by an airplane) was heard and felt by witness William Rodriquez and he said some seconds later he heard the airplane crash that occurred many stories in the Tower. Rodriquez and several other co-workers were in a basement level of the North Tower and below them in a lower basement level, a massive explosion happened pushing the floor they were standing on upward. Some co-workers working in lower basement levels were injured and/or badly burned as a result.
“And there was a huge explosion at the top of the building. You could hear the difference from the bottom and all the way to the top. The one from the top, which was actually seconds after, was very far away. The one in the basement was pretty loud and you felt your actual feet moving with the floor. There was a tremor through the walls, that the walls cracked and the false ceiling totally collapsed.” https://truthandshadows.wordpress.com/2010/11/30/explosions-before-plane-impact-the-911-account-of-william-rodriguez/
If we consider the time of the impact of the plane into the north Tower furnished by the NTSB was 8.46 AM and 40 seconds the only reliable data. There was a hiatus of 15 seconds between this plausible time of the airplane impact and time a seismic wave (a Rayleigh wave) started. What else but an explosion could be the origin for this seismic wave in the absence of an earthquake? The time this wave started was recorded and determined by the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University (LDEO) 34 km from New York City.
Rousseau’s analysis corroborate William Rodriquez witness statement. https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_911_160.htm
The best engineering explanation/proof that NIST lied
https://www.ae911truth.org/project-due-diligence
Part 1: World Trade Center Building 7
Part 2: The Twin Towers’ Explosive Destruction
Part 3: The Twin Towers and Extreme Heat
https://www.ae911truth.org/continuing-ed/ae911-aag-l#p3
In progress... a federal special grand jury investigating 9/11
The sum total of this evidence proves that explosives and/or incendiaries were used to do a controlled demolitions of the World Trade Center buildings. To save your time, start reading at page 15 to see the listed evidence presented in the petition.
https://lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org/lc-doj-grand-jury-petition/
Here is a good video regarding a federal special grand jury set in motion by the group Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry. It explains why the US Attorney is required to present evidence submitted as attachments (exhibits) regarding alleged federal crimes that occurred on 9/11.
go to this URL and hear and learn the details.
https://www.corbettreport.com/interview-1383-lawyers-petition-for-9-11-grand-jury/
for more see:
Irrefutable Evidence - The 9/11 Official Story is Total BS
fourth edition
send me an email at [login to see] and I will reply with it attach for free.
or For sale at Amazon Kindle books
https://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Ddigital-text&field-keywords=Some%20Unpopular%20History%20of%20the%20United%20States%20
did the terrorists know the best places was in the USA to turn off the transponders so radars could not see them and/or have a great deal of difficulty seeing them on radar scopes without transponders sending signals? How did they know that there were only a few US Air Force fighter jets ready to intercept a hijacked airplane in the northeast US States US?
Why were the war game, radar blips still being injected onto FAA and NORAD radar screens until at least 0930 and 1012 hours yet the second airplane crashed into the Twin Tower at 0903 hours. These US Air Force war games made it appear there were 22 hijackings on-going?
Tell my why the NORAD or FAA was tacking American Airlines 11 they believed was still in the air and an in-progress of hijacking, yet it had already crashed into the Twin Tower 08:46 AM. Why did the US Air Force Generals did not tell the 9/11 Commission about all this?
Geophysicist André Rousseau’s, PhD analysis of the seismic signals (waves) reveal explosives were used on 9/11
At the moment of the Twin Towers and WTC7 collapsed seismic waves were generated.
The degree that low frequencies are associated with an energy (magnitude) that is comparable to a seismic event, these waves undeniably have an explosive origin.
The impacts of the airplanes into the Twin Towers would not have generated large enough seismic waves to be recorded 34 km away.
Debris that fell onto the ground from the Twin Towers would not have generated large enough seismic waves to be recorded 34 km away.
The low frequencies could not have been provoked other than by explosions.
An explosion at the base of WTC1 (the north Tower and the first one hit by an airplane) was heard and felt by witness William Rodriquez and he said some seconds later he heard the airplane crash that occurred many stories in the Tower. Rodriquez and several other co-workers were in a basement level of the North Tower and below them in a lower basement level, a massive explosion happened pushing the floor they were standing on upward. Some co-workers working in lower basement levels were injured and/or badly burned as a result.
“And there was a huge explosion at the top of the building. You could hear the difference from the bottom and all the way to the top. The one from the top, which was actually seconds after, was very far away. The one in the basement was pretty loud and you felt your actual feet moving with the floor. There was a tremor through the walls, that the walls cracked and the false ceiling totally collapsed.” https://truthandshadows.wordpress.com/2010/11/30/explosions-before-plane-impact-the-911-account-of-william-rodriguez/
If we consider the time of the impact of the plane into the north Tower furnished by the NTSB was 8.46 AM and 40 seconds the only reliable data. There was a hiatus of 15 seconds between this plausible time of the airplane impact and time a seismic wave (a Rayleigh wave) started. What else but an explosion could be the origin for this seismic wave in the absence of an earthquake? The time this wave started was recorded and determined by the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University (LDEO) 34 km from New York City.
Rousseau’s analysis corroborate William Rodriquez witness statement. https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_911_160.htm
The best engineering explanation/proof that NIST lied
https://www.ae911truth.org/project-due-diligence
Part 1: World Trade Center Building 7
Part 2: The Twin Towers’ Explosive Destruction
Part 3: The Twin Towers and Extreme Heat
https://www.ae911truth.org/continuing-ed/ae911-aag-l#p3
In progress... a federal special grand jury investigating 9/11
The sum total of this evidence proves that explosives and/or incendiaries were used to do a controlled demolitions of the World Trade Center buildings. To save your time, start reading at page 15 to see the listed evidence presented in the petition.
https://lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org/lc-doj-grand-jury-petition/
Here is a good video regarding a federal special grand jury set in motion by the group Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry. It explains why the US Attorney is required to present evidence submitted as attachments (exhibits) regarding alleged federal crimes that occurred on 9/11.
go to this URL and hear and learn the details.
https://www.corbettreport.com/interview-1383-lawyers-petition-for-9-11-grand-jury/
for more see:
Irrefutable Evidence - The 9/11 Official Story is Total BS
fourth edition
send me an email at [login to see] and I will reply with it attach for free.
or For sale at Amazon Kindle books
https://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Ddigital-text&field-keywords=Some%20Unpopular%20History%20of%20the%20United%20States%20
Explosions BEFORE plane impact: the 9/11 account of William Rodriguez
November 30, 2010 By Craig McKee It’s something you won’t hear about in the mainstream media. A loud, devastating explosion in the sub-basement of the World Trade Center’s North Tower BEFORE the im…
(0)
(0)
CW3 Dick McManus
Niels Harrit Exposes the Terror War Lie
Watch The Secret Lie That Started the Afghan War here: https://www.corbettreport.com/afghanwar/ Prof. Niels Harrit joins us to discuss the mysterious "Frank ...
“The 9/11 attack was planned and direct in Afghanistan.” But how did NATO become involved in this war? NATO went to war with the US based on US classified information.
But who ordered the 9/11 attacks?
US Ambassador Frank Taylor the US’s Ambassador for Counter Terrorism briefed NATO country’s representative (Council) on Oct. 2, 2001 ALLEGING CONLUSIVELY the role of Al Qaeda’s and the TALEBAN regime rule in the 9/11 attack and the crash of UA flight 93 NATO Council members as a resulted voted to invoke Article 5 of the NATO/US treaty. Therein declaring WAR on Afghanistan.
The Amb. Taylor briefing remained classified for nearly ten years allegedly proving Al Qaeda had directed the 9/11 attacks until April 5, 2009.
Learn more here;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_LVbu7HCa0
more details here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Moz8hs2lJik
Who was Amb. Francis X. "Frank" Taylor
From July 1996 through July 1998 as commander of the Headquarters of the Air Force Office of Special Investigations at Bolling Air Force Base (and later at Andrews Air Force Base) where he was responsible for the US Air Force’s investigations of fraud, counterintelligence, and major criminal matters. Brigadier General Taylor (USAF) retired from active duty on July 1, 2001.
Taylor subsequently held this office from July 13, 2001 until November 15, 2002. In this role, he was responsible for implementing U.S. counterterrorism policy overseas and coordinating the U.S. government response to international terrorist activities. In the aftermath of the September 11, 2001, attacks, he was a key advisor in assisting the President Bush and Secretary of State Colin Powell in forming the international coalition against terrorism and developing aggressive international policy implementation to defeat terrorism.
Was he the African American fast tracked in the USAF Bush’s token Black man? ( anything is possible when looking into the 9/11 mystery)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francis_X._Taylor
The Authorization for Use of Military Force AUMF has also been cited by a wide variety of US officials as justification for continuing US military actions all over the world. Often the phrases "Al-Qaeda and associated forces" or "affiliated forces" have been used by these officials. However, that phrase does not appear in the AUMF.
the AUMF has been used to allow military action in Afghanistan, the Philippines, Georgia, Yemen, Djibouti, Kenya, Ethiopia, Eritrea, Iraq, and Somalia.
IN GENERAL- That the President is authorized to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such organizations or persons, in order to prevent any future acts of international terrorism against the United States by such nations, organizations or persons.
How did Bush determine Al Qaeda and the TALIBAN regime did 9/11?
But who ordered the 9/11 attacks?
US Ambassador Frank Taylor the US’s Ambassador for Counter Terrorism briefed NATO country’s representative (Council) on Oct. 2, 2001 ALLEGING CONLUSIVELY the role of Al Qaeda’s and the TALEBAN regime rule in the 9/11 attack and the crash of UA flight 93 NATO Council members as a resulted voted to invoke Article 5 of the NATO/US treaty. Therein declaring WAR on Afghanistan.
The Amb. Taylor briefing remained classified for nearly ten years allegedly proving Al Qaeda had directed the 9/11 attacks until April 5, 2009.
Learn more here;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_LVbu7HCa0
more details here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Moz8hs2lJik
Who was Amb. Francis X. "Frank" Taylor
From July 1996 through July 1998 as commander of the Headquarters of the Air Force Office of Special Investigations at Bolling Air Force Base (and later at Andrews Air Force Base) where he was responsible for the US Air Force’s investigations of fraud, counterintelligence, and major criminal matters. Brigadier General Taylor (USAF) retired from active duty on July 1, 2001.
Taylor subsequently held this office from July 13, 2001 until November 15, 2002. In this role, he was responsible for implementing U.S. counterterrorism policy overseas and coordinating the U.S. government response to international terrorist activities. In the aftermath of the September 11, 2001, attacks, he was a key advisor in assisting the President Bush and Secretary of State Colin Powell in forming the international coalition against terrorism and developing aggressive international policy implementation to defeat terrorism.
Was he the African American fast tracked in the USAF Bush’s token Black man? ( anything is possible when looking into the 9/11 mystery)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francis_X._Taylor
The Authorization for Use of Military Force AUMF has also been cited by a wide variety of US officials as justification for continuing US military actions all over the world. Often the phrases "Al-Qaeda and associated forces" or "affiliated forces" have been used by these officials. However, that phrase does not appear in the AUMF.
the AUMF has been used to allow military action in Afghanistan, the Philippines, Georgia, Yemen, Djibouti, Kenya, Ethiopia, Eritrea, Iraq, and Somalia.
IN GENERAL- That the President is authorized to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such organizations or persons, in order to prevent any future acts of international terrorism against the United States by such nations, organizations or persons.
How did Bush determine Al Qaeda and the TALIBAN regime did 9/11?
(0)
(0)
CW3 Dick McManus
Why did the State Department make note of some classified information regarding United Airlines fight 93 in the above posted comment?
One thing that really hit me as suspicious was the radio conversation between the air traffic controller and the alleged hijacker who voice had an Arab sounding accent. The radio conversation was tape record by the FAA. As I have worked using a radio, I know someone can jam a radio transmission if he/she is closer to the air traffic controller's location.
Now why is this important? Because the alleged hijacker has been reported to have mistakenly turned on flight 93's (which crashed in Pennsylvania) intercom and told the passenger that he had a bomb and for everyone to remain seated (or something to that affect/effect.) After this radio message was heard by the air traffic controller, he has a conversation with other airline pilots in the general area and from their conversation, it was very likely the hijackers message was not recorded by the FAA audio tape recorder.
Because the alleged hijacker needed to make damn sure the world heard his faked mistake in the intercom, he again transmits his fake conversation about a bomb, etc.
9:28 United 93 acknowledged a transmission from an FAA center controller. This was the last normal contact the FAA had with United 93.
9:29 A Cleveland Center controller and pilots of aircraft in the vicinity heard "a radio transmission of unintelligible sounds of possible screaming or a struggle from an unknown origin…" The controller responded, seconds later: "Somebody call Cleveland?"
This was followed by a second radio transmission, with sounds of screaming and someone yelling "Get out of here, get out of here," again from an unknown source.
The Cleveland Center air traffic controller began to try to identify the possible source of the transmissions, and noticed that United 93 had descended some 700 feet. The controller attempted to raise United 93 several times, with no response.
9:30 The controller began to poll the other flights on his frequency to determine if they heard the screaming; several said they had.
9:32 A third radio transmission came over the frequency: "Keep remaining sitting. We have a bomb on board."
The controller understood, but chose to respond: "Calling Cleveland center, you're unreadable. Say again, slowly."
At this point, IN MY OPINION, the fakers of this radio transmission were not sure their message about screaming and a bomb was heard and its was extremely important to the whole 9/11 story to have audio evidence on tape at the FAA.
He notified his supervisor, who passed the notice up the chain of command.
9:39 A fifth radio transmission came over the radio frequency from United 93:
THE ALLEGED HIJACKER: Uh, is the captain. Would like you all to remain seated. There is a bomb on board and are going back to the airport, and to have our demands [unintelligible]. Please remain quiet.
The controller responded: "United 93, understand you have a bomb on board. Go ahead." The flight did not respond.
You can listen to exact radio transmissions on this U-tube. So we are lead to believe the alleged hijacker did not realize he had not made a mistake in using the radio vs. the intercom.
http://qandahar.tv/videos-september-pentagon-truth--%5Bae63iivRHt8%5D.cfm
One thing that really hit me as suspicious was the radio conversation between the air traffic controller and the alleged hijacker who voice had an Arab sounding accent. The radio conversation was tape record by the FAA. As I have worked using a radio, I know someone can jam a radio transmission if he/she is closer to the air traffic controller's location.
Now why is this important? Because the alleged hijacker has been reported to have mistakenly turned on flight 93's (which crashed in Pennsylvania) intercom and told the passenger that he had a bomb and for everyone to remain seated (or something to that affect/effect.) After this radio message was heard by the air traffic controller, he has a conversation with other airline pilots in the general area and from their conversation, it was very likely the hijackers message was not recorded by the FAA audio tape recorder.
Because the alleged hijacker needed to make damn sure the world heard his faked mistake in the intercom, he again transmits his fake conversation about a bomb, etc.
9:28 United 93 acknowledged a transmission from an FAA center controller. This was the last normal contact the FAA had with United 93.
9:29 A Cleveland Center controller and pilots of aircraft in the vicinity heard "a radio transmission of unintelligible sounds of possible screaming or a struggle from an unknown origin…" The controller responded, seconds later: "Somebody call Cleveland?"
This was followed by a second radio transmission, with sounds of screaming and someone yelling "Get out of here, get out of here," again from an unknown source.
The Cleveland Center air traffic controller began to try to identify the possible source of the transmissions, and noticed that United 93 had descended some 700 feet. The controller attempted to raise United 93 several times, with no response.
9:30 The controller began to poll the other flights on his frequency to determine if they heard the screaming; several said they had.
9:32 A third radio transmission came over the frequency: "Keep remaining sitting. We have a bomb on board."
The controller understood, but chose to respond: "Calling Cleveland center, you're unreadable. Say again, slowly."
At this point, IN MY OPINION, the fakers of this radio transmission were not sure their message about screaming and a bomb was heard and its was extremely important to the whole 9/11 story to have audio evidence on tape at the FAA.
He notified his supervisor, who passed the notice up the chain of command.
9:39 A fifth radio transmission came over the radio frequency from United 93:
THE ALLEGED HIJACKER: Uh, is the captain. Would like you all to remain seated. There is a bomb on board and are going back to the airport, and to have our demands [unintelligible]. Please remain quiet.
The controller responded: "United 93, understand you have a bomb on board. Go ahead." The flight did not respond.
You can listen to exact radio transmissions on this U-tube. So we are lead to believe the alleged hijacker did not realize he had not made a mistake in using the radio vs. the intercom.
http://qandahar.tv/videos-september-pentagon-truth--%5Bae63iivRHt8%5D.cfm
(0)
(0)
0
0
0
Of course not, strong presidents sign armistices, let a Navy ship get taken with crews, sign agreements that support the various regimes for decades, not to mention ignoring the ballistic missile and nuclear warhead development over the past 50+ years.
(0)
(0)
0
0
0
Is it that difficult to schedule exercises with ROK? If we are not seeing the progress desired, which I don't think we are, use some of that money we've saved and put on big fire show.
(0)
(0)
0
0
0
0
0
0
SGT Mary Martel I can't respond to your question under Shirley's post because she likes to call names and then block people so they can't respond. My point is that I don't think Un is some sort of "master manipulator"...that's just silly. It's been about 3 months since this post and while there isn't concrete milestones completed on the Korean peace process, there have been talks...which is a hell of a lot more than any other administrations over the past 60+ years.
(0)
(0)
0
0
0
Absolutely. Compare him to every other POTUS since Truman. All others 0, President Trump, at least 7 (touchdown!)
(0)
(0)
0
0
0
As an NCO I don't get involved in politics. It's not my place to second guess the Commander-in-Chief. That being said, you have to spend a little money to make money! I think that is what the president is doing.
(0)
(0)
0
0
0
Its more like he canceled ONE such exercise than all future exercises. Sanctions remain in place and tougher sanctions will follow as No Ko fails to comply. I have faith in Pompeo and Bolton and especially Mattis. Giving up his nuclear weapons will be difficult for Kim as he wants to stay in power while bringing North Korea into the modern age. His generals and family may be urging him to keep his nuclear capability and it will be interesting to find out who gets whacked in the years to come.
(0)
(0)
0
0
0
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google