Posted on Feb 16, 2017
1px xxx
Suspended Profile
108K
2.69K
1.21K
If the man at the top may be unstable - then the White House is likely to exhibit some instability - as well as some efforts by the White House staff - who are normal infighters - to undermine and replace the man at the top. The problem, however, is how to accomplish regime change (the replacement of a mentally unstable incumbent with another member of the ruling political party) within the very strict confines of the United States Constitution - and within the constraint of maintaining the full faith and confidence of the citizens. Time to bring Mike Pence up to bat.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/donald-trump-mental-health-new-york-times-incapable-being-president-warning-open-letter-a7578831.html

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/13/opinion/mental-health-professionals-warn-about-trump.html

http://www.lancedodes.com/new-york-times-letter
Posted in these groups: Imgres Office of the President (POTUS)
Edited 9 y ago
Comments have been disabled
Responses: 300
COL Deputy Chief Of Staff
There exists a mechanism for doing this already. There does not need to be another one. Just because someone does not like what the President does, does not mean he or she is mentally ill. There has to be credible evidence that there is mental illness, this CANNOT be because one party does not like the person who is in the office and wants to use any means to remove them.
MSG Don Burt
Well, nothing was done about clinton, and no one surely did anything about that last thing we had sitting in the position and they were/are as nutty as fruit cakes and useless as spitting in the wind for all the terrible things they conjured up and how bad they screwed up this country. I'd say that obama established the "enabler rule" nation wide and created or at least amplified those wannabe adults of the PC class to give and get all they can without having to work for it and increase the burden on the real American working class! As far as the "regime" (a government, especially an authoritarian one) you're talking about, we just got out of one that lasted for eight years. President Trump is not a professional politician that steals from the people while smiling at the same time. So I just say anyone who doesn't like Mr. Trump to shut up, sit down and let your mouths take a rest! and apply some common sense and common courtesy to someone who took on a tremendously bad situation and just wait! So, I disagree with your statement and anyone who uses the NY Times as a legitimate source of info should really get an appointment with a mental doctor.
MSgt Wayne Morris
Wow, we've had the communist agent route, the grabbing them in the crotch route, and all the other things over the past 8 months and nothing has stuck so now we try the "he's nuts" route. The Democratic candidate got her ass handed to her on election day and like him or not just as in Obama, he is the President and if you don't like it kill yourself, move out of the country or act like an adult and move on. With actions on both sides of the aisle we have more nuts in Congress than an Alabama peanut field.
1LT Doug Bounds
Take political parties out of the scenario for a minute. The argument can be made (especially amongst soldiers, that they're BOTH shitshows).
BLUF: Trump was a Bad Hire. By any objective measure. Impeach his ass, go with the Constitution (i.e. Shitbird --Pence), and focus on having CLEAN, (Not-Fucked-With-By-Ivan) elections going forward.
LTC Jim Talbot
When I see anything with New York slime report its crap!!! Did they care about ol' dumbo ears status
SPC Makissa Lewis
SPC Makissa Lewis
>1 y
Honestly, people from his party who are conservatives are blocking it too sorry to burst that bubble.
SPC Randy Torgerson
SPC Randy Torgerson
>1 y
SPC Makissa Lewis - No bubble to burst sorry to say. As I have said in other posts, Trump is really on his own with no real party to support from any direction. Its him against the establishment, plain and simple.
SPC Makissa Lewis
SPC Makissa Lewis
>1 y
I am just agree to disagree on your post. Life is too short to discredit all that you wrote.
Sgt Kevin Curl
Sgt Kevin Curl
>1 y
1d703867
Trying to get Makissa Lewis view of situation !
CWO2 Shelby DuBois
Edited >1 y ago
Apparently, we let him serve out his eight years and then elect a person who'll put America first. Next question.
SSG Thomas Barry
to late to do anything about it now since he is out of office. you should have posed question 8 years ago
MCPO Roger Collins
MCPO Roger Collins
>1 y
Not nice, there is no evidence being a liberal Democrat is a mental illness.
PO1 Michael Withrow
PO1 Michael Withrow
>1 y
every mass shooter in America has been a lefty. every psychotic bomber, arsonist have all been leftist~ 9 of 10 pedo's are all leftists...
MSG Dennis Lane
The military is the enforcement tool of the commander in chief. We give up many of our liberties to serve our country, and questioning the President of the United States is one of them. We took an oath to obey the orders of the officers appointed over us, and the President of the United States is an officer appointed over us. If the order is illegal, we have an obligation to refuse to comply. Otherwise, our only comment is "Yes, Sir!"
1px xxx
Suspended Profile
>1 y
MSG Dennis Lane - Officers and enlisted are required to follow the orders of the officers appointed above them - but they are not required to ignore the wholesale disregard for integrity, tradition, and/or law - when the chief executive officer repeatedly engages in claims, disclosures, and behaviors that are determined by the proper officials (courts, investigators, prosecutors, congressmen, and/or senators) to be improper and/or unsuitable to continue to occupy the office of the president of the united states. We are also forbidden to engage in illegal activities and/or war crimes at the behest of any officer. In other words, we are not blind machines bound to obey every order. We are required as a condition of our appointment to evaluate the behavior of our superiors and our orders in the context of integrity, loyalty, ethics, legal, and regulatory requirements. Warmest Regards, Sandy :)
MSG Dennis Lane
MSG Dennis Lane
>1 y
1LT Sandy Annala - I agree that we are to evaluate the content of our orders. I disagree that we, as service members, have the obligation to evaluate the behavior of our superiors. I support your earlier comment that any office-holder behavior needs to be evaluated by the proper officials. For you and me to make comment in this forum is not offensive, but I would caution those still in uniform to keep their opinions out of the public discussion. And that is because if you are evaluating an order, that is within the scope of your duty. Evaluating the actions and decisions of our leaders is not. That opens the door to saying that if I don't have to obey my platoon leader's orders if I don't agree with her conduct.
1px xxx
Suspended Profile
>1 y
MSG Dennis Lane - Orders are orders. Conduct is conduct. If my platoon leader is sleeping with our CO's wife - or handing intelligence to our enemies - or tries assigning risky combat missions to people he / she is motivated to remove for personal reasons - then we have the right to evaluate for ourselves and report to our superiors. Warmest Regards, Sandy :)
CSM Charles Hayden Passed 7/29/2025
1LT Sandy Annala Sandy, as a RP Friend; the title of your post is off base. If - 'they' have not yet charged or filed against POTUS - DONE DEAL, at ease!
SPC Chelsea Fernandez
He got everyone living in fear and people should not live in fear. For the record I didnt vote for this maniac. I just going to be that person telling everyone "I told ya so"
MAJ Mark N.
MAJ Mark N.
>1 y
MSgt Jose C Navarro - Correct. I am assuming that SPC Fernandez is on active duty. That assumption was based on the notion that a Specialist is not a retirement rank, and that a "vet" who attained the rank of SPC would not use that rank as a civilian (vet vs retired). Call me old school. thx
SPC Randy Torgerson
SPC Randy Torgerson
>1 y
MSgt Jose C Navarro - I'm pretty sure its the last obtained rank. I haven't been in the military since 1987.
SPC Randy Torgerson
SPC Randy Torgerson
>1 y
MSgt Jose C Navarro - Don't get me wrong, I really wish I would have stayed in. It is one of my regrets. I might have been a general by now....hhaahahha
SPC Randy Torgerson
SPC Randy Torgerson
>1 y
MSgt Jose C Navarro - I'll also be praying for him.... Enlisted or Officer, doesn't really matter. Just being high ranking would be cool.... Thank them for their service.

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close