What should be done if the President is mentally ill?

Well, my 2 cents on this is to maybe start with not taking a real mental disorder out of the mental health lexicon (I heard, admittedly, that during Obama's first term the diagnosis of narcicisim was removed from the list of mental disorders). As a few others here have pointed out, there are many who are up there who could also stand to be properly evaluated (Pelosi, Waters, Lee and McCain come to my mind, yes, I am looking at both sides of the isle) Some of these people would not even pass a basic background check to even ENLIST, but they are there none the less. As for Mr Trump, well, while he has done a few minor changes in some of his stances, and gone slower on some of his initiatives than some of us would like, (usually because he needs Congress to actually work with him) Everything that he has done has been in line with what he said he would do. So I would put forward that the people in need of mental health evaluations are the people who cannot grasp that we have someone in office who is doing what he actually promised us that he was going to do. People who lie so much and so often, that they are shook to their bones when they encounter either TRUTH or REALITY in bold letters. A person does not achieve what Mr Trump has because they are mentally unstable, nor do they maintain it very long if they develop a mental disorder.

What should we do? I guess the same thing we did with the last President. Wait him out.

My question is.. When do we start seeing arrests on a grand scale based upon acts of treason and sedition and threats to a standing president?

He may not be my favorite, but I don't think he is mentally ill. I don't think just because he's different and has different ideas is he sick.

I like the let's drink idea and laugh!

We can what if all day long. Should the POTUS be unstable, it would be the responisbility of the people and others to address the issue as it should be in accordance with a protocol in place if there is. I am certain that if we research history, many people based on opinion and/or facts could articulate past presidents are or were a bit unstable too.

As a 1st I would not lose sleep over it. It is in far higher political affairs than a 1st Lt.

Anyone who can't see the psychological problems that Trump has must have similar problems themselves.

Trump is the sane one, the Dem's have lost their minds because they cant get their way.

Historically (2009 to 2017) we have done nothing

Sp4 Byron Skinner. I have commented on this and have nothing to add. President Trump was elected to the Presidency and I see non false advertising for what he campaigned on. The minority of voters got what they wanted. End of story.

I would like to change subject now. Over on Face book I saw a piece by Rally Point on the US Cavalry, I won't comment on your misspelling of Cavalry by I might mention something that I doubt anybody think other the an historical might know is the the Cavalry is not a branch of the US Army and it didn't appear until 1855 when Congress established three Regiments of Cavalry. At the thine the US Army had three Regiments of Dragoons (1,2&3) also, who had fought bravely in the recent War with Mexico. A short time after establishing the three Cavalry Regiments Congress decided to get rid of the Dragoons, after all the were mounted Infantry who fought dismounted and the Cavalry fought mounted, whats the big deal. Well the deal was the combat record of the three Dragoons Regiments. The logic was to just change them to 1,2,3 Calvary and keep the history going. Good idea but we already have a 1,2,3, Cavalry. Well the solution was simple the Dragoons became 1,2,3 Cavalry and the former 1,2,3 Cavalry would become 4,5,6 Cavalry. This came to pass. so the current 4th. Cavalry started out as the 1st. Cavalry and son on. This is generally a pretty good bar bet. It is variable over on Wikipedia under history 4th. Cavalry.