What should be done if the President is mentally ill?

We missed our chance. President Obama is already no longer the President. And Lt I don't believe that the military would be involved so this is not the venue to discuss that particular "matter."

Why would someone vote you down for this? It's a perfectly valid, though silly, question. People, listen up! There are no stupid questions...

What are u trying to say? Americans that are pro American anti illegal immigration and not leftist are meantally ill? Get out of the service if you want to join leftist causes. Even no longer in I am full blown American.

For all you active duty folks, I am not sure this is even an appropriate subject to talk about in this forum.

You are as fucking idiot. Mentally unstable? The congress needs to do their job and the media and loud mouth demos need to stay in their lane. I have never seen a bigger bunch of cry babies that are not getting their way. The last 8 years was a disaster unless you are not from America and are on the gay wagon. Each person can choose what they want in life. We wanted Mr. Trump get over it and move on.

ya right. who's to say he is mentally ill some shrink who's as out of touch as any crazy person or the congress who is so in the pockets of the money people

I totally agree. The atmosphere against Trump across the board is terrible. The double standard now in place should end. The latest results of the economy showed a strong economy is now emerging after years of sluggish performance

Just ANOTHER way to try and not allow him to perform - agree there are a lot more Dem's needing it and a few Repub's also. Let the man do his job!

REMOVE him from OFFICE!!!

This is a fascinating subject for someone around when this amendment was passed. Remember, the amendment was passed due to the physical inability of one president to carry out his duties and the head wound of another. No discussion of removal for psychological reasons was ever brought up to the public. Elected officials still held to the high crimes and misdemeanors standard.

My opinion (for what it is worth), is that, that is the standard today; high crimes and misdemeanors only. Was Truman psychologically impaired because he chose to deploy nuclear weapons? Was Lincoln impaired because he chose to not accept States succession? Was the use of flame throwers in WWII an impairment? What standard is set to establish impairment? When we chose to go down the path of psychological impairment, we go down the path of substituting a possible elite ruling class for that of the general populace. That by itself is the path to tyranny and what the rules established by the Constitution tried to prevent. That is why the discussion is so repugnant to the majority of Americans. Once the discussion starts, and is not dispelled forcibly, immediately, tyranny is right around the corner