What should the Army posts that are currently named after Confederate generals be renamed?

Put a Sherman monument complete with eternal flame next to every confederate memorial

SPC Paul LaBelle - Kinda' However Sherman wasn't the only Union General who won victories. The list I provided (above) is the best match-ups I could figure. (It's possible that better match-ups exist, but I'm sure I've gotten it fairly good.)

I’m just being facetious with the eternal flame comment...

Someone who served in the military would be more appropriate

1SG Daniel Falcon - Both tubman and douglass had significant roles during the civil war. So it is appropriate in my opinion. The information on them both is available in the internet.

During the Civil War, Harriet Tubman was also a secret spy and military leader. In 1863, Harriet Tubman led soldiers with Colonel James Montgomery to raid rice plantations along the Combahee River in South Carolina. They set fire to buildings, destroyed bridges, and freed many of the slaves on the plantations.

By 1860, Douglass was well known for his efforts to end slavery and his skill at public speaking. During the Civil War, Douglass was a consultant to President Abraham Lincoln and helped convince him that slaves should serve in the Union forces and that the abolition of slavery should be a goal of the war.

CW4 Keith Dolliver - Ah, didn't know that

If its named for President Andrew Jackson maybe it should be renamed too considering the trail of tears and his outright defiance of a supreme court order.

CW3 Matt Tait - Well now we're getting into the "no one is worthy because no one is perfect" issue. Like how the People's Republic of California is removing Founding Father's names off schools because they owned slaves.

CW2 (Join to see) I agree that we could probably pick apart anyone of historical significance so it could be that nothing gets named after anyone. I just hadn't previously correlated Andrew "trail of tears" Jackson with Fort Jackson and that's one of the worst moments in American history.

I agree that, in general, we should be moving to an all joint concept, however none of the bases (with the exception of Bragg, which already absorbed Pope) are co-located with other services. Also, most are not exactly near real cities...and in the case of Fort Polk and Pickett, they're not near anything (Rucker's not much better). I also don't think Joint Base Killeen exactly has the appeal that Joint Base San Antonio does.

Bragg did not"absorb" Pope. BRAC got Pope AFB and per terms of the lease with the USAF, it was returned to the ARMY and resumed its former name Pope AAF.

MAJ Ronnie Reams - Whatever you call it, the end result is the same. Territory that belonged to Pope now belongs to Bragg.

Did not belong to the USAF, they were a tenant. In fact, there was much discussion at Willies* of kicking them out back when they violated lease conditions of no F nor P ac being stationed there when a F-16 crashed into the Green Ramp. I was at the old confinement facility, which was USASOC HQ at the time. Sounded as if the 10th Marines were out of the impact zone. LOL We immediately had to check if we had any strap hangers that were there. The post engineer was ready to send them packing, but Pentagon said no.

*In case you not been there, that is the basement bar at the main FBOOM, a casual bar. Lots of decisions made there, as it main watering hole for seniors,as it right across street from Generals Row and other senior officer quarters.

Fort Novosel gets my vote.