8
8
0
So a quick question about military signature block on emails. So usually the norm is :
Rank, Name
Duty Title
Unit
So what if you hold two different duty titles? My case is that I am the Platoon Sergeant as well as the Shop NCOIC. The platoon consist of 3 different shops. I have to send plenty emails as both titles. So my case is do I double slot my email(as in a slash between titles), set separate signatures for all the emails (which gets annoy), place the higher position? Any help on this?
Rank, Name
Duty Title
Unit
So what if you hold two different duty titles? My case is that I am the Platoon Sergeant as well as the Shop NCOIC. The platoon consist of 3 different shops. I have to send plenty emails as both titles. So my case is do I double slot my email(as in a slash between titles), set separate signatures for all the emails (which gets annoy), place the higher position? Any help on this?
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 13
A very long time ago. I included "everyone's bitch boy" in my signature block.
I highly recommend against anyone else using it.
I highly recommend against anyone else using it.
(9)
(0)
In outlook you can build multiple signatures and choose which one you want to use.
(3)
(0)
The attached document on Army Operational Knowledge Management (Managing E-mail) states that you should "Include a signature block on all messages that contains your phone number and email address. This allows people to respond to you even if they only have the last piece of an email thread available." Along the same lines, adding an appropriate and recognizable duty title for which the majority of your correspondence relates allows readers to understand your relevance, in relation to the e-mail or e-mail chain, if their is not an established relationship. It is easy for individuals to communicate in a more relaxed manner using e-mail, it is vital that you know your audience and remember that your messages can be forwarded over and over. Keep it professional! AR 25-50 (Preparing and Managing Correspondence) addresses signature blocks, but lacks reference to digital communications at the present time. Hopefully soon this will be standardized.
http://usacac.army.mil/cac2/AOKM/FactSheets/AOKM_FactSheet_Managing_Email.pdf
http://usacac.army.mil/cac2/AOKM/FactSheets/AOKM_FactSheet_Managing_Email.pdf
(3)
(0)
SPC (Join to see)
Very useful Chief! I see inappropriate or nonexistent signature blocks quite often. The use of signature blocks when emailing shows professionalism and proper utilization of the email platform of military correspondence.
The format most commonly used is as follows:
RNK FIRST M. LAST
##_ (MOS) , Duty Title
_ Co. #-## Unit
(###) ### - ####
[login to see] ( or other e-mail address)
The format most commonly used is as follows:
RNK FIRST M. LAST
##_ (MOS) , Duty Title
_ Co. #-## Unit
(###) ### - ####
[login to see] ( or other e-mail address)
(0)
(0)
1SG (Join to see)
SPC (Join to see) - That may be the common format in NCARNG, but it is not service-wide. I have never seen the MOS used in a signature block on Active Duty or in three states National Guard (FL, WA, OR).
(0)
(0)
Two options. One would be to include both titles into a single signature block that you use for all emails. Option two is to create two different signature blocks in Outlook; then you can click the drop down menu and choose which one to include in a given email. To do this, go to Outlook and click Tools | Options, then click the Mail Format tab and click the Signatures button. Create both versions of your signature and title them appropriately. Now, when you send an email, click the Signature drop down menu and select the one that you need.
(3)
(0)
AR 25-50
Preparing and Managing Correspondence
https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/pdf/web/r25_50.pdf
Preparing and Managing Correspondence
https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/pdf/web/r25_50.pdf
bÉÝGÍÇûù(¿óÝkHSSßÜË$ÔRß}ÊëµÈÉyÌEÔðSC¶*VNÉÔ /»Mó%nÍÓeñz·ëÀÏWá]ÇûÀCU6m&pÕÕWd^m0o»áeï)úùRÇØÁ~^áûÄ 1^qla{ÔÖ¶ÅHÐ?8/2þ'rã·}ÞéÓê`!ßÁña2îÁkzXa1øíNÝ8dÚ·&kßèÒÏA{6yíôp æ,_=3óý8D5.Ìùc§"Õ~à}ÿãóóñ`ü¡ÃØFÅ[tö q:E$ñXí|h.é¶ØÅK§=z;o*ó,«dP ï[äm g1Mò(:P4bPþÇÅ õ§Ãdv'bJïNo8u_ØÔ2$G$G¶õÕ6:+äLMmµuÌÅVYîÄVúǶóÞ(zXÞßÒ=éÍSG$ÅrÈ?¶,%SÇ7%øyøècØéA(ìÖâ('í)ªÅoõX^?T8'UêRbGSbÇxÓZ-k^c??qJUýMëíY:»I{W7Ónújé2q:ôØ`û=3ôW&QÓ\87Ç eÍçùe4aM:WãáFhz·òÅ|ÞJÚJ|STÔ8ßYêdp6SÂàBrZZ[BÙ3«qÁÉÐØêÂ=m¿...
(2)
(0)
There used to be a regulation with quotes. I'd use that under a format similar to yours.
(2)
(0)
Mine is:
Name
Rank, Branch (Functional Area)
Job Title
Job Title
Unit
Office #
Cell #
Christopher J Lautner
CPT, IN (FA57)
Battle Command Officer
Knowledge Management Officer
HQ 37 IBCT
However, it is going to depend on your unit Knowledge Management SOP. The lowest echelon that has a Knowledge Management Officer is the Brigade. The KMO is responsible for writing the KM SOP and managing it, which includes general email practices, signature blocks, naming conventions, and more.
To answer your question, I would double slot your job title. I use separate lines however. The one on top should be the assigned position, in my opinion, and the one below should be the one that is an additional duty or responsibility. For me, Both of my duties overlap quite a bit so it works out well.
I noticed that AR 25-20 offers some guidance, however, it is not necessarily prohibitive on the position you are occupying. The example provided is 2 vastly different positions.
I would consult your unit KM SOP and see if it has any guidance. If not, this is also a good opportunity to ask about the program in your unit and see if your Battalion has a Knowledge Management Representative that can bring these kinds of concerns to the KM Working Group.
Just my thoughts on the matter from the KM side of the house in regards to this particular issue.
Name
Rank, Branch (Functional Area)
Job Title
Job Title
Unit
Office #
Cell #
Christopher J Lautner
CPT, IN (FA57)
Battle Command Officer
Knowledge Management Officer
HQ 37 IBCT
However, it is going to depend on your unit Knowledge Management SOP. The lowest echelon that has a Knowledge Management Officer is the Brigade. The KMO is responsible for writing the KM SOP and managing it, which includes general email practices, signature blocks, naming conventions, and more.
To answer your question, I would double slot your job title. I use separate lines however. The one on top should be the assigned position, in my opinion, and the one below should be the one that is an additional duty or responsibility. For me, Both of my duties overlap quite a bit so it works out well.
I noticed that AR 25-20 offers some guidance, however, it is not necessarily prohibitive on the position you are occupying. The example provided is 2 vastly different positions.
I would consult your unit KM SOP and see if it has any guidance. If not, this is also a good opportunity to ask about the program in your unit and see if your Battalion has a Knowledge Management Representative that can bring these kinds of concerns to the KM Working Group.
Just my thoughts on the matter from the KM side of the house in regards to this particular issue.
(2)
(0)
My favorite titles were goober, suckup, brown-noser, flyboy. Haha. I used to go around the base with FLY NAVY on a license plate back in Arkansas...lol
(3)
(1)
SSG Jaime Ramos
first of all Sir, I am not a child and I voted you down due to the fact the SM was asking a true question and you Sir just trolled him, that type of comments should be kept for other media outlets such as Twitter or Facebook. This is a Professional Media outlet for people who are actually helping others.....have a good day Sir
(2)
(0)
SSgt (Join to see)
SSG Jaime Ramos You are a child to me. I went in the service at 18 in 1974. Second, I try to bring levity here to this forum or snarky replies from time to time. Oh and do not lecture me kid because you want professional speak to your shrink,
(0)
(0)
Something I see people do that drives me bananas because I think it's unprofessional is dropping a quote at the bottom of the email as part of their signature... examples:
SGT, Name
Unit
Supply SGT
Office Phone
Cell Phone
Email
"What defines us is how well we rise after falling." BATMAN
SSG, Name
Financial Clerk
Work Phone
Fax
E-Mail
"Don’t underestimate me. I know more than I say, think more than I speak and notice more than you realize." Brigitte Nicole
*Note* I copied these from actual emails and left the ranks and duty positions intact. This stuff.... ugh....
SGT, Name
Unit
Supply SGT
Office Phone
Cell Phone
"What defines us is how well we rise after falling." BATMAN
SSG, Name
Financial Clerk
Work Phone
Fax
"Don’t underestimate me. I know more than I say, think more than I speak and notice more than you realize." Brigitte Nicole
*Note* I copied these from actual emails and left the ranks and duty positions intact. This stuff.... ugh....
(1)
(0)
Resurrecting a long dead thread, but only due to this coming up on a relevant search I did.
For Army, I direct users to AR 25-13, para 3-2(b)(2).
"Use of inappropriate signature blocks when sending electronic messages (emails). Army policies for records management apply to emails. Emails generated by Army personnel in their official capacity from Army communication devices (including but not limited to computers and hand held devices) will not contain slogans, quotes, or other personalized information as part of the individual sender’s signature block. Signature blocks within emails will contain only the necessary business information, such as: the name of the organization (office, activity, or unit represented); official mailing address or unit information; name of individual; telephone numbers (Defense Switched Network, commercial telephone, cell phone number, or facsimile numbers); office email addresses or government websites (unit web or social media page); government disclaimer (Privacy Act Statement, Attorney Client Notice); unit historical motto (http://www.tioh.hqda.pentagon.mil); or any other information approved by HQDA. Requests for exceptions will be submitted to the first O6 or equivalent in the chain of command (with possible delegation to the next O5 in the chain of command, or his/her equivalent)."
For Army, I direct users to AR 25-13, para 3-2(b)(2).
"Use of inappropriate signature blocks when sending electronic messages (emails). Army policies for records management apply to emails. Emails generated by Army personnel in their official capacity from Army communication devices (including but not limited to computers and hand held devices) will not contain slogans, quotes, or other personalized information as part of the individual sender’s signature block. Signature blocks within emails will contain only the necessary business information, such as: the name of the organization (office, activity, or unit represented); official mailing address or unit information; name of individual; telephone numbers (Defense Switched Network, commercial telephone, cell phone number, or facsimile numbers); office email addresses or government websites (unit web or social media page); government disclaimer (Privacy Act Statement, Attorney Client Notice); unit historical motto (http://www.tioh.hqda.pentagon.mil); or any other information approved by HQDA. Requests for exceptions will be submitted to the first O6 or equivalent in the chain of command (with possible delegation to the next O5 in the chain of command, or his/her equivalent)."
(0)
(0)
Read This Next

Email
