Posted on Oct 28, 2021
What type of discharge should I expect for refusing the covid vaccine?
71.4K
2.35K
818
157
157
0
I have no negative marks on my record and have been in the army for over two years.
ETS/EAS
Discharge
Coronavirus COVID19
Posted 7 mo ago
Responses: 180
194
190
4
So all of the shots/vaccinations that the military has given you already and you didn't even know what some of them were or the background information or history of each one.... But this one (Covid vaccine) is different and a major problem??? A big enough problem for you to lose all or some of your VA benefits and/or sacrifice a career if you were planning on staying in? I don't get it.
(194)
(4)
PO2 Neal Felch
SFC (Join to see) - I think that's what he wants to do the RNA shot is experimental the effects aren't known yet unfortunately I think that the order is being used to weed out nonbox checkers
(0)
(0)
PV2 Larry Sellnow
CPL Terry Mason - You are full of of Shit that's been proven over 60 times by the courts and I lost track of the number if audits. Fact 2 That vaccine WAS APROVED BACK WHEN DON THE CON WAS STILL IN OFFICE
(0)
(0)
CPL Terry Mason
the so called "vaccine" is only a placebo not even a drug and is killing people every day.
(0)
(0)
144
143
1
While I understand your concern with this shot, and now that I’m retired I no longer have a dog in this hunt, but when you raise your right hand to enlist you give up many of the rights you had as a civilian and vaccinations is one of them. My professional opinion to you is to suck it up and complete your enlistment and ETS honorably, otherwise get out and show potential employers you quit when you don't like something!
(144)
(1)
LTC (Join to see)
yes and the body of evidence shows that it was wrong to vaccinate. Just like then, the SM who now stand up to this will be proven right just like the Anthrax vaccination fiasco. At least the Anthrax Vaccination didn't kill or maim like this so called "vaccination" does.
In 2002, the General Accounting Office (GAO) conducted a study on adverse reactions of those who received anthrax vaccines in response to a large number of pilots leaving ranks. The study also measured opinions on the vaccine itself.
The survey found that between 1998 and 2000, about 16% of aircrew members and pilots either transferred to another unit, left the military, or moved to inactive status.
About two-thirds of these service members cited the anthrax vaccine as a major factor in their decision. The results show that 27% ranked it as the most important factor. Other factors included other immunizations, unit morale, individual morale, workload, other employment, retirement, and family.
As for physical reactions to the vaccine, the study found that the occurrence of reactions in the survey group was higher than estimated. Of those who received the vaccine, 84% experienced some sort of side effect. This is compared to an estimated rate of 34%.
About one-fifth of survey respondents had reactions that lasted longer than seven days. The most common reported reactions that lasted longer than seven days were limited motion/pain in the arm, extreme fatigue, joint pain, and memory loss.
In 2002, the General Accounting Office (GAO) conducted a study on adverse reactions of those who received anthrax vaccines in response to a large number of pilots leaving ranks. The study also measured opinions on the vaccine itself.
The survey found that between 1998 and 2000, about 16% of aircrew members and pilots either transferred to another unit, left the military, or moved to inactive status.
About two-thirds of these service members cited the anthrax vaccine as a major factor in their decision. The results show that 27% ranked it as the most important factor. Other factors included other immunizations, unit morale, individual morale, workload, other employment, retirement, and family.
As for physical reactions to the vaccine, the study found that the occurrence of reactions in the survey group was higher than estimated. Of those who received the vaccine, 84% experienced some sort of side effect. This is compared to an estimated rate of 34%.
About one-fifth of survey respondents had reactions that lasted longer than seven days. The most common reported reactions that lasted longer than seven days were limited motion/pain in the arm, extreme fatigue, joint pain, and memory loss.
(2)
(0)
PV2 Larry Sellnow
CPL Bruce Ailiff - then you should have taken o0ut #45 he is a communist supporter
(0)
(0)
SFC Larry Greenlee
What a completely ignorant statement. You do not lose 1 single right by joining the military. Sheep who see themselves as leaders are what is destroying this country AND our military!
(1)
(0)
As it stands now, they will all be categorized as general under honorable.
EDIT:
Soldiers who refuse could face "administrative or non-judicial punishment [under the Uniform Code of Military Justice] -- to include relief of duties or discharge," according to the new Army guidelines obtained by Military.com.
Administrative action includes initiating what is called a General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand, or GOMOR, for all refusals without an allowed exemption. The reprimand is widely seen as a military career killer but can, under certain circumstances, be tossed from a soldier's record.
All judicial action will be launched by colonels in a soldier's chain of command, or a general in units without a colonel.
Soldiers who have pending decisions on medical or religious exemptions will not face any adverse action.
EDIT:
Soldiers who refuse could face "administrative or non-judicial punishment [under the Uniform Code of Military Justice] -- to include relief of duties or discharge," according to the new Army guidelines obtained by Military.com.
Administrative action includes initiating what is called a General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand, or GOMOR, for all refusals without an allowed exemption. The reprimand is widely seen as a military career killer but can, under certain circumstances, be tossed from a soldier's record.
All judicial action will be launched by colonels in a soldier's chain of command, or a general in units without a colonel.
Soldiers who have pending decisions on medical or religious exemptions will not face any adverse action.
(53)
(0)
SGT Constance Reed
I believe the discharge should be dishonorable - for failing to follow orders and wasting taxpayers money (for all the training, etc. the soldier received) but I'm okay with a general discharge. I mean, I'd rather have folks in service who are educated enough to understand basic science and how vaccines work than those who, through deliberate ignorance, continue to endanger the lives of their fellow soldiers by refusing to take a basic and SAFE precaution to prevent deadly disease.
(3)
(0)
SrA James Cannon
1LT (Join to see) at the time I wrote that comment, it most certainly was accurate. They have now starting granting some since then.
(0)
(0)
PO3 D L
LTC Roy Mullis - ALL those shots/vaccinations were approved shots and vaccinations studied over a period of years and years and in some cases even decades before approved by FDA - they were NOT experimental shots. Interestingly too, the administration of the Anthrax shots were stopped due to the number of adverse reaction within the military. (guinea pigs)
(0)
(0)
PO3 D L
SGT Constance Reed - deadly disease ....?? Covid?? Seriously? It is EASILY TREATABLE if the government would stay out of the medical field & quit taking medicines away from doctors that are willing to treat the virus instead of wait until the patient can't breathe and *then* allow treatment.
"Basic & SAFE precaution" .... again, SERIOUSLY? It has NOT BEEN APPROVED it is STILL EXPERIMENTAL. the millions of people having received the shots are the guinea pigs, they are the study, the trial ...
"Basic & SAFE precaution" .... again, SERIOUSLY? It has NOT BEEN APPROVED it is STILL EXPERIMENTAL. the millions of people having received the shots are the guinea pigs, they are the study, the trial ...
(1)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google