Posted on Jul 17, 2015
Why are leaders focused on making changes in uniforms, policies, etc that have NOTHING to do with training our Soldier Members?
3.77K
76
24
2
2
0
Posted in these groups: 
Leadership
Leadership
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 15
4
4
0
CPT (Join to see)
Sir in this case I think SMA Dailey is listening to much to the rank and file. He probably had some things he didn't like and wanted to change when he was a BN/BDE/DIV CSM and it is now morphing. For the sake of those still serving, I hope it stops soon.
Sir in this case I think SMA Dailey is listening to much to the rank and file. He probably had some things he didn't like and wanted to change when he was a BN/BDE/DIV CSM and it is now morphing. For the sake of those still serving, I hope it stops soon.
(4)
(0)
COL Mikel J. Burroughs
SGM Steve Wettstein I totally agree with your assessment. He needs to focus on more important issues. It seems to me that when we get a new SMA they are always trying to put their mark on something before they leave (the big ones has been uniforms). SGM Steve Wettstein when was the last time we had a SMA that left the uniforms alone and concentrated on something bigger? I can't remember, but that wasn't my focus as a Brigade Commander over the last (7) years of my career. Help me out here with some positive news?
(2)
(0)
SGM Steve Wettstein
COL Mikel J. Burroughs, SMA Preston was SMA for 7 odd years. I don't think he changed anything. But I tell you who was AWESOME was SMA Jack Tilley. I would go anywhere with him. A real Soldier's Soldier.
(3)
(0)
CPT (Join to see)
SGM Steve Wettstein and COL Mikel J. Burroughs , the concerns I have are based on the fundamental principles that the "legacy" being created is one in which SMs resent the Army for changes that are not condusive to actually training the member to their optimal levels. If SMs are required to get new uniforms and adhere to new changes in policies every 2-3 years, it distracts from training and productivity. Furthermore, the resources allocated for these changes causes ineffective / insufficient funds to REALLY allow SMs to progress. Great responses!
Very Respectfully,
1LT Krohn
Very Respectfully,
1LT Krohn
(1)
(0)
SGM Steve Wettstein
CPT (Join to see) I am tracking Sir and I agree. During my Cold War days I cannot remember any uniform changes. The first one was 2000 with the IPFU. The next was wearing the joyous Black Beret. Then ACUs in 2006 and ASUs in 2009-2010. Soldiers shouldn't let it distract them. They have plenty of time for their current uniforms to wear out and buy the new ones or they hold off when they are going to get out. You leaders need to stress to them not to worry about it because they cannot do anything about it. When you worry about shit you cannot control that causes a ton of stress that no one needs. Good luck and God Bless Brother.
(1)
(0)
3
3
0
I think maybe it is because a leader's job is to lead and train those below them to be the most efficient, powerful, technical fighting force....and when you are already that, that gives commanders time to look at the simple stuff.
(3)
(0)
3
3
0
Eisenhower jacket really? Just picture all the muffin top bodies out there wearing it
(3)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google