Posted on Jun 24, 2016
SGT Writer
8.43K
22
39
3
3
0
As of right now, many phone service providers either block it or make it expensive to use. Google has quietly announced Google Talk can communicate with iNum for free, but big name phone services are resisting.

http://www.inum.net/what-is-inum-2/
Edited >1 y ago
Avatar feed
Responses: 6
PO3 Steven Sherrill
1
1
0
This sounds like it may be the future of voice communications. Where country and area codes are replaced by a universal number that is just a number. Problem is that country codes and area codes are good for the telecommunication industry. Charging for long distance and international calls keeps the cash flow going. So it is not really that big a surprise that there is resistance to a global number.
More practically, there are subtle but important differences between infrastructures depending on where you are globally. Having a single number tied to a single device that allows you to travel globally means building a device that can not just transit countries, but can transit infrastructure as well. I imagine that would be cost prohibitive (considering what they are already getting for a mobile device these days).
Maybe time to go backwards. Get john's phone, prepaid wireless, and keep a little black book.

http://www.johnsphones.com/store/item9
(1)
Comment
(0)
SGT Writer
SGT (Join to see)
>1 y
Okay, I'll bite. How did you come across this ? Why are you sharing this? Why can I imagine you owning one of these ?
(1)
Reply
(0)
PO3 Steven Sherrill
PO3 Steven Sherrill
>1 y
SGT (Join to see) - I actually came across this when I was looking for a new phone for my daughter. I have already told her that if she wants a new upgrade, she buys it. If I get her a new phone, it will be one of these. Piece of mind parent style.

As for me owning one of these, I have thought about it. A simple phone, no frills, make calls, see who is calling, no big glass screen to crack. The idea of simplifying life is really starting to be more appealing every day.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SGT Writer
SGT (Join to see)
>1 y
PO3 Steven Sherrill - I agree with you, there.The more security becomes an issue, the more I want to make drastic changes to my lifestyle. I don't need to be able to access the internet 24/7.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
TSgt Joe C.
1
1
0
Definitely getting annoyed with the high costs of having a cell phone.
(1)
Comment
(0)
SGT Writer
SGT (Join to see)
>1 y
Right ? But I'll be damned if I make Google Voice my primary means of telecommunications. I won't even start with Skype. Tracfone sounds like a better option day by day.
(2)
Reply
(0)
SN Greg Wright
SN Greg Wright
>1 y
SGT (Join to see) - Why do you dislike GV? I've found it useful in the past.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SGT Writer
SGT (Join to see)
>1 y
SN Greg Wright - "Monopoly", "Big Data", "Options", "Less beaten trails", "Resistant to Bandwagons".
I'm not knocking the service. I just like knowing of alternative options. It's part of the Open Source way. In my mind, it's survival. It's never simply accepting the Plan A.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
LTC John Shaw
0
0
0
If this service had to pay taxes and inter connect fees they could not offer the service. They don't guarantee a level of service, you get what you pay for.
(0)
Comment
(0)
SGT Writer
SGT (Join to see)
>1 y
Are you saying it will be crap because it's free or am I misunderstanding your first comment?
(1)
Reply
(0)
LTC John Shaw
LTC John Shaw
>1 y
I have a couple of soldiers who ported and they use the service for international while in the box. The service is spotty and based on your internet connection. They both plan to port back to a carrier when they return to the States.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SGT Writer
SGT (Join to see)
>1 y
LTC John Shaw - Do you mean porting their number to the 883 or 888 global country code or to a different service provider ?
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close