Posted on Apr 10, 2016
SSgt Michael Smith
5.24K
60
13
1
1
0
Posted in these groups: Weapons logo Weapons6262122778 997339a086 z PoliticsConcealed carry image Concealed Carry
Edited 10 y ago
Avatar feed
See Results
Responses: 12
CPT Jack Durish
4
4
0
This is neither a yes nor a no question. One criminal act does not have any bearing on our constitutional rights, nor does it reflect on the relative merits of the issues involved. Think about it: Would a criminal be dissuaded from breaking the moral, ethical, and legal injunctions against murder because of some statutory injunction against possession of a weapon? Yes, it's really that absurd of a question.
(4)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
CW4 Guy Butler
1
1
0
How would that mitigate the threat? Serious question.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Public Affairs Ncoic
0
0
0
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
Avatar feed
With the murder-suicide that happened at Lackland AFB, do you believe that on-base personnel should be authorized to carry weapons?
See Results
TSgt Hydraulic Craftsman
0
0
0
Absolutely.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
TSgt William Meyer
0
0
0
Being both in Security forces and retired from the NYPD, I don't like seeing anyone carrying a firearm without the proper training. In both instances we train as a unit and know how to react to different situations. It's bad enough when you are confronted with an active shooter when you know who your working with, imagine what would happen if other people got involved just because they were carrying an authorized weapon. Just my H.O.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
CPL J Sannizzaro
0
0
0
Every one should carry an issued firearm with accountability. No one would get stupid if every soldier was armed, unless they were suicidal. If they are suicidal there is really no way to prevent their action, but at least there would be an appropriate response.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
Capt Richard I P.
0
0
0
Criminals don't follow laws. No matter how many laws you put between them and their ultimate goals.

The victim of the murder, on the other hand may possibly have had a fighting chance with a weapon. Further, there is no higher absurdity than a disarmed armed forces, incapable of self protection.

Arm the Armed Forces.
https://www.rallypoint.com/answers/arm-the-armed-forces
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Everett Oliver
0
0
0
Every time a criminal or a nut case uses a gun the PC Liberal Crowd cries for more gun control. And as usual they are wrong again. nothing, no law, no regulation would have prevented this from happening. A killer is going to kill. I will continue to carry where ever I go and avoid most businesses that don't want my weapon on their property. Shame that I do have to go to the school now and then. I follow the law and disarm myself before going but i don't stay as long as I should....
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
TSgt Education and Training
0
0
0
http://www.af.mil/News/ArticleDisplay/tabid/223/Article/643651/air-force-implements-additional-security-measures.aspx
This is an intersting article posted a few months ago regarding a promising new initiative installation commanders can put in place! One of the guys in my ALS class did a speech on this.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
TSgt Aerospace Medical Service
0
0
0
I concur with SMSgt Hutchins' statement. The acts of one individual should not dictate the acts of many. Additionally, the individual who did this would have had a weapon regardless of the laws and regulations.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close