Would you give up some of your gun rights to allow elimination of bans or restrictions imposed in some States or municipalities?

Let's see....
1. Guns used in San Bernardino were banned, by name, in California.
2. High capacity magazines used were illegal.
3. Guns were purchased illegally by another person (straw purchase).
4. Pretty sure pipe bombs were illegal.
5. Criminals in NYC don't have any weapons, because it is illegal.

Would criminals and terrorists follow any new gun laws if passed? Probably not.

If new gun laws would keep guns off the streets, let's pass some more legislation to keep meth and other illegal drugs off the streets. That will definitely work.

I've given up my rights for 20 years already to defend other's rights. I will not give my rights up any further since I have paid that cost already.

No. Many people make their residency decisions based on the benefits and restrictions of the state (taxes, gun rights, etc.). If the citizenry cannot see the relationship of crime rates to the onerous gun control legislation in those states, then they deserve the lot they have chosen to live in. My 2nd Amendment rights are not open to a socialist agenda of my giving up some of my freedom so that someone else has more because they refuse to stand up for their rights and hold their elected officials accountable.