Posted on Apr 6, 2014
SFC MLRS Automated Tactical Data Systems Specialist
28.9K
481
150
15
15
0
If you were allowed to select individuals that work for you, which quality would lend more weight to your decision. &nbsp;&nbsp;<div><br></div><div>Would you rather have a Service member that knows all the ins and outs of their specialty but is mediocre at physical fitness or a Service Member that excels in physical fitness but is mediocre at their job.</div>
Posted in these groups: Logo no word s Fitness8d41fc0 Proficiency8467f417 Competence
Edited 12 y ago
Avatar feed
See Results
Responses: 108
SFC Signal Support Staff Nco
0
0
0
Seeing as I would rather have a Master Mechanic working on my car over a PT Stud Lube Technician, MOS/Job proficiency hands down! 
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Intelligence Analyst   Atl
0
0
0
I would rather the person I work with know their job. Any ID-10-T can work out hard and max PT.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SPC(P) Thomas Beliveau
0
0
0
If you can't meet language proficiency in my job, you're just taking up space, no matter how high your PT score is.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SFC S6 Communications Ncoic
0
0
0
I can said both are important qualifications, but one is more important then the other. On my opinion Job efficient is more important, because If soldiers do right thinks in their jobs, that take care others soldiers. Physical only take care of you, not the team. But, in our Army, Appearance is very important...
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
1SG Alan Bailey
0
0
0
I have worked with both, and I will take the Soldier/NCO/Officer that is job proficiency, now if they are physically fit that is a plus. But, in my experience and it is just lately the ones that are physically fit focus on that more than work,
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SCPO Emergency Management Director
0
0
0
I agree that it does depend on the job. I think depending on the job, physical fitness is part of the job proficiency. I think everyone needs to be physically fit, so says the Corpsman in me. But if I have two Sailors going up for a job, I will probably go for the one that excels at their rate and knows it inside and out, over someone that can do their job but spends all their time in the gym. I think this is a great question. To go further, I am sure that all of us have had a Sailor, Solider, Marine or possibly Airman that was the picture of physical fitness and is in great shape, but still fails the height/weight/BMI. Common sense needs to come into play, but I am going of on a rant and this should probably be its own discussion........ Cheers, Senior
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Wallace Lopez
0
0
0
Both are important elements in the Army but having to pick one; job proficiency is more critical.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Ed Mikus
0
0
0
Physical Fitness in terms of being capable of doing their job, if their job demands a high level of fitness then yes. all of the active duty jobs require some higher level of fitness but i couldn't care less whether my fellow computer geek can max his PT test, but if he cannot accomplish his share of the work without excess assistance he becomes a drain on the unit and a thorn in my side.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
1SG Corrections Officer
0
0
0
We can work on their physical fitness
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
CPT FAO - Southeast Asia
0
0
0
As long as the minimum standard for Height/Weight/APFT is met and there are no limiting profiles I can fix fat...  However, MOS/Job proficiency requires capacity which may not be available in everyone.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close